Roland van den Tillaar, Hallvard N Falch, Stian Larsen
{"title":"A Comparison of Maximal Push-Up and Bench Press Performance and Their Prediction Based on Load-Velocity Relationships.","authors":"Roland van den Tillaar, Hallvard N Falch, Stian Larsen","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, and Larsen, S. A comparison of maximal push-up and bench press performance and their prediction based on load-velocity relationships. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-This study aimed to compare maximal push-up and bench press performance, and their prediction based on the load-velocity relationships. Eleven resistance-trained men (age 25.3 ± 4.0 years, body mass 84.2 ± 6.1 kg, and body height 1.80 ± 0.06 m) performed push-ups and bench presses with 4 different loads randomly. Push-ups were performed with and without a 10-20-30 kg weight vest. Bench press was performed with similar weights as in the push-ups, followed by finding 1RM in each exercise. A linear encoder measured barbell and push-up velocities during the exercises, and force plates were used to measure the average force on the arms during the push-ups. A load-velocity relationship was established between the load and velocity for the push-up and bench press per subject and the equation used to establish a predicted 1RM. The main findings of this study demonstrate that 1RM for push-ups was significantly higher than with bench press (112.4 ± 18.9 vs. 106.4 ± 20.4 kg); meanwhile, there were no differences in the predicted 1RM. Furthermore, an extremely strong association was observed between the actual 1RM loads performed with the push-up and bench press (r = 0.92). Even with different load-velocity relationships for the 2 exercises, it was possible to predict a cross-over 1RM between them, which was not significantly different from the actual 1RM loads. For coaches and athletes, this method is an easy, cost, and time-effective option for standard 1RM bench press testing to predict maximal upper body strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, and Larsen, S. A comparison of maximal push-up and bench press performance and their prediction based on load-velocity relationships. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-This study aimed to compare maximal push-up and bench press performance, and their prediction based on the load-velocity relationships. Eleven resistance-trained men (age 25.3 ± 4.0 years, body mass 84.2 ± 6.1 kg, and body height 1.80 ± 0.06 m) performed push-ups and bench presses with 4 different loads randomly. Push-ups were performed with and without a 10-20-30 kg weight vest. Bench press was performed with similar weights as in the push-ups, followed by finding 1RM in each exercise. A linear encoder measured barbell and push-up velocities during the exercises, and force plates were used to measure the average force on the arms during the push-ups. A load-velocity relationship was established between the load and velocity for the push-up and bench press per subject and the equation used to establish a predicted 1RM. The main findings of this study demonstrate that 1RM for push-ups was significantly higher than with bench press (112.4 ± 18.9 vs. 106.4 ± 20.4 kg); meanwhile, there were no differences in the predicted 1RM. Furthermore, an extremely strong association was observed between the actual 1RM loads performed with the push-up and bench press (r = 0.92). Even with different load-velocity relationships for the 2 exercises, it was possible to predict a cross-over 1RM between them, which was not significantly different from the actual 1RM loads. For coaches and athletes, this method is an easy, cost, and time-effective option for standard 1RM bench press testing to predict maximal upper body strength.
期刊介绍:
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.