Peritoneal Window Technique: A Novel Sutureless Technique to Decrease the Rate of Symptomatic Lymphocele after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Eric Qualkenbush, Yeonsoo S Lee, Amanda Kahn, Neda Qosja, Alex Hochwald, Amanda Myers, Andrew Zganjar, Ram Pathak, Raymond Pak
{"title":"Peritoneal Window Technique: A Novel Sutureless Technique to Decrease the Rate of Symptomatic Lymphocele after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.","authors":"Eric Qualkenbush, Yeonsoo S Lee, Amanda Kahn, Neda Qosja, Alex Hochwald, Amanda Myers, Andrew Zganjar, Ram Pathak, Raymond Pak","doi":"10.1089/end.2025.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) represents the gold standard surgical treatment for high-risk localized prostate cancer. PLND carries the risk of lymphocele formation, which can lead to complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), infection, and voiding dysfunction. Many techniques have been described to minimize lymphocele formation, yet no method has seen widespread use or been described as sutureless. The objective of this study is to describe the novel, sutureless peritoneal window (PWIN) technique and assess its efficacy in lymphocele prophylaxis for extended PLND. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a retrospective review of patients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing RARP with extended PLND by a single surgeon from 2018 to 2024. PLND was carried out in the usual manner with bipolar cautery. PWIN technique is performed by excising a 3 × 5 cm PWIN over the lymphadenectomy bed to maintain lymphatic communication with the abdominal cavity. The primary outcome was a comparison between the incidence of symptomatic lymphoceles (SLs) with PWIN <i>vs</i> standard technique. SLs were defined as lymphoceles presenting with pain, DVT, voiding dysfunction, or infectious symptoms. Patients with asymptomatic lymphoceles were excluded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our study included 199 patients who underwent RARP with extended PLND. There were 46 patients (23.1%) in the standard approach group and 153 patients (76.9%) in the PWIN group. We identified 5/46 (10.9%) SLs in the standard technique, which were significantly higher than the 3/153 (2.0%) observed in the PWIN group (p = 0.017). There was no difference between the standard and PWIN cohorts regarding symptomology or treatment of their lymphocele. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study describes a novel, sutureless PWIN technique that significantly decreases SL after extended PLND. This technique offers a practical, time-efficient, and cost-effective alternative for lymphocele prevention. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2025.0093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) represents the gold standard surgical treatment for high-risk localized prostate cancer. PLND carries the risk of lymphocele formation, which can lead to complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), infection, and voiding dysfunction. Many techniques have been described to minimize lymphocele formation, yet no method has seen widespread use or been described as sutureless. The objective of this study is to describe the novel, sutureless peritoneal window (PWIN) technique and assess its efficacy in lymphocele prophylaxis for extended PLND. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing RARP with extended PLND by a single surgeon from 2018 to 2024. PLND was carried out in the usual manner with bipolar cautery. PWIN technique is performed by excising a 3 × 5 cm PWIN over the lymphadenectomy bed to maintain lymphatic communication with the abdominal cavity. The primary outcome was a comparison between the incidence of symptomatic lymphoceles (SLs) with PWIN vs standard technique. SLs were defined as lymphoceles presenting with pain, DVT, voiding dysfunction, or infectious symptoms. Patients with asymptomatic lymphoceles were excluded. Results: Our study included 199 patients who underwent RARP with extended PLND. There were 46 patients (23.1%) in the standard approach group and 153 patients (76.9%) in the PWIN group. We identified 5/46 (10.9%) SLs in the standard technique, which were significantly higher than the 3/153 (2.0%) observed in the PWIN group (p = 0.017). There was no difference between the standard and PWIN cohorts regarding symptomology or treatment of their lymphocele. Conclusion: This study describes a novel, sutureless PWIN technique that significantly decreases SL after extended PLND. This technique offers a practical, time-efficient, and cost-effective alternative for lymphocele prevention. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

腹膜窗技术:一种新型无缝合线技术,可降低机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术合并盆腔淋巴结清扫术后症状性淋巴囊肿的发生率。
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)是治疗高危局限性前列腺癌的金标准手术方法。PLND有淋巴囊肿形成的风险,可导致深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、感染和排尿功能障碍等并发症。许多技术已经被描述为最小化淋巴囊肿的形成,但没有一种方法被广泛使用或被描述为无缝合线。本研究的目的是描述一种新型的无缝合线腹膜窗(PWIN)技术,并评估其在延长性PLND中预防淋巴囊肿的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2018年至2024年由单一外科医生行RARP合并延长PLND的高危前列腺癌患者。PLND采用双极烧灼法进行。PWIN技术通过在淋巴结切除术床上切除一个3 × 5 cm的PWIN来维持淋巴与腹腔的联系。主要结果是比较PWIN与标准技术的症状性淋巴细胞(SLs)发生率。SLs被定义为表现为疼痛、深静脉血栓、排尿功能障碍或感染症状的淋巴细胞。排除无症状淋巴细胞的患者。结果:我们的研究纳入了199例接受RARP并延长PLND的患者。标准入路组46例(23.1%),PWIN组153例(76.9%)。我们在标准技术中鉴定出5/46(10.9%)个SLs,显著高于PWIN组的3/153(2.0%)个SLs (p = 0.017)。在淋巴囊肿的症状或治疗方面,标准组和PWIN组之间没有差异。结论:本研究描述了一种新颖的无缝线PWIN技术,可显著降低延长PLND后的SL。这项技术为预防淋巴囊肿提供了一种实用、省时、经济的替代方法。未来的前瞻性研究有必要验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信