Assessing Renal Function Recovery Following Treatment for Post-Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Renal Artery Pseudoaneurysm.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Amanda E Kahn, Laura E Geldmaker, Neda Qosja, Daniela A Haehn, Taylor F Fuqua, Vartika Tiwari, Alex Hochwald, Colleen S Thomas, David D Thiel
{"title":"Assessing Renal Function Recovery Following Treatment for Post-Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Renal Artery Pseudoaneurysm.","authors":"Amanda E Kahn, Laura E Geldmaker, Neda Qosja, Daniela A Haehn, Taylor F Fuqua, Vartika Tiwari, Alex Hochwald, Colleen S Thomas, David D Thiel","doi":"10.1089/end.2025.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> To evaluate the impact of the treatment for renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) on long-term renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). <b><i>Materials:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed 581 consecutive RAPNs performed by a single surgeon from February 2008 to February 2022. We evaluated patient variables, postoperative complications, and renal function at postoperative day one, 1 month, and 6 months after RAPN. Renal function was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration Cr 2009 equation. We utilized the Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test to analyze our data through categorical and continuous variables. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-one patients (3.61%) developed a symptomatic RAP after RAPN that was treated with Interventional Radiology embolization. Patients with a RAP had a median age of 61.8 years (IQR: 53.5-69.7), median preoperative eGFR of 83.9 (IQR: 69.5-85.2), median BMI of 29.4 (IQR: 25.4-33.1), and median mass size of 3 cm (IQR: 2.5-4.2). There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics between patients with RAP and patients without RAP. Patients with RAP had a longer length of stay (LOS) (3.0 IQR: 2.0-4.0 <i>vs</i> 2.0 IQR: 2.0-3.0). Patients with a RAP had a larger change in absolute eGFR value based on the difference from baseline to 1 month and 6 months (1 month: 20.5 <i>vs</i> 11.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 6 months: 18.1 <i>vs</i> 10.4, <i>p</i> = 0.001). RAP patients were also less likely to be within 10% of pre-RAPN levels (1 month: 24% <i>vs</i> 49%, <i>p</i> = 0.021; 6 months: 18% <i>vs</i> 47%, <i>p</i> = 0.016). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients treated for RAP post-RAPN had a decrease in renal function recovery at 1 month and 6-month intervals compared to patients not requiring post-RAPN RAP treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2025.0046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the impact of the treatment for renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) on long-term renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Materials: We retrospectively reviewed 581 consecutive RAPNs performed by a single surgeon from February 2008 to February 2022. We evaluated patient variables, postoperative complications, and renal function at postoperative day one, 1 month, and 6 months after RAPN. Renal function was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration Cr 2009 equation. We utilized the Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test to analyze our data through categorical and continuous variables. Results: Twenty-one patients (3.61%) developed a symptomatic RAP after RAPN that was treated with Interventional Radiology embolization. Patients with a RAP had a median age of 61.8 years (IQR: 53.5-69.7), median preoperative eGFR of 83.9 (IQR: 69.5-85.2), median BMI of 29.4 (IQR: 25.4-33.1), and median mass size of 3 cm (IQR: 2.5-4.2). There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics between patients with RAP and patients without RAP. Patients with RAP had a longer length of stay (LOS) (3.0 IQR: 2.0-4.0 vs 2.0 IQR: 2.0-3.0). Patients with a RAP had a larger change in absolute eGFR value based on the difference from baseline to 1 month and 6 months (1 month: 20.5 vs 11.2, p < 0.001; 6 months: 18.1 vs 10.4, p = 0.001). RAP patients were also less likely to be within 10% of pre-RAPN levels (1 month: 24% vs 49%, p = 0.021; 6 months: 18% vs 47%, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Patients treated for RAP post-RAPN had a decrease in renal function recovery at 1 month and 6-month intervals compared to patients not requiring post-RAPN RAP treatment.

评估机器人辅助部分肾切除术后肾动脉假性动脉瘤治疗后肾功能恢复情况。
目的:评价机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RAPN)后肾动脉假性动脉瘤(RAP)治疗对长期肾功能的影响。资料:我们回顾性分析了2008年2月至2022年2月由一名外科医生连续实施的581例rapn。我们在RAPN术后第一天、1个月和6个月评估患者变量、术后并发症和肾功能。肾功能的定义是根据慢性肾脏疾病流行病学协进会2009年Cr方程估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。我们使用Fisher精确检验和Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验通过分类变量和连续变量来分析我们的数据。结果:21例(3.61%)患者经介入放射栓塞治疗后出现症状性RAP。RAP患者的中位年龄为61.8岁(IQR: 53.5-69.7),术前中位eGFR为83.9 (IQR: 69.5-85.2),中位BMI为29.4 (IQR: 25.4-33.1),中位肿块大小为3cm (IQR: 2.5-4.2)。RAP患者与非RAP患者的基线特征无统计学差异。RAP患者的住院时间(LOS)更长(3.0 IQR: 2.0-4.0 vs 2.0 IQR: 2.0-3.0)。从基线到1个月和6个月的差异来看,RAP患者的绝对eGFR值变化较大(1个月:20.5 vs 11.2, p < 0.001;6个月:18.1 vs 10.4, p = 0.001)。RAP患者也不太可能在rapn前水平的10%以内(1个月:24% vs 49%, p = 0.021;6个月:18% vs 47%, p = 0.016)。结论:与不需要rapn后RAP治疗的患者相比,rapn后RAP治疗的患者在1个月和6个月的时间间隔内肾功能恢复下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信