Effects of a physical activity intervention on sleep among cancer survivors in a randomized controlled trial within the Cancer Prevention Study-3 cohort.
Charlie Zhong, Mariah Landry, Scott Whalen, Amber Grant, Ananya G Reddy, Sidney M Donzella, Anita R Peoples, Alpa V Patel, Erika Rees-Punia
{"title":"Effects of a physical activity intervention on sleep among cancer survivors in a randomized controlled trial within the Cancer Prevention Study-3 cohort.","authors":"Charlie Zhong, Mariah Landry, Scott Whalen, Amber Grant, Ananya G Reddy, Sidney M Donzella, Anita R Peoples, Alpa V Patel, Erika Rees-Punia","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01837-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Poor sleep is a long-term sequela of cancer and its treatment. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is associated with improved health outcomes among cancer survivors and has been suggested as a nonpharmacological method to improving sleep. We evaluated the efficacy of a MVPA intervention to improve sleep among cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial among 415 cancer survivors embedded within the Cancer Prevention Study-3 cohort. Survivors were randomized to a year-long, web-based MVPA program. MVPA was assessed via hip-worn actigraphy at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. We evaluated sleep through the SATED sleep health questionnaire, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale, and device-measured duration and efficiency. An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed, and secondary analyses were conducted based on measured MVPA levels with generalized additive mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survivors reported similar sleep health and patterns to the general US population. We observed no significant changes to sleep between treatment groups in ITT models. Though not statistically significant, there appeared to be heterogeneity based on baseline sleep disturbance (moderate-to-severe sleep disturbance: β<sub>SATED</sub> = 0.73 (95% CI - 0.09, 1.60) vs mild-to-normal sleep disturbance: β<sub>SATED</sub> = - 0.26 (95% CI - 0.57, 0.05)). Participants that engaged in more MVPA at the end of the trial reported better sleep health (p-value = 0.04) and less sleep disturbances (p-value = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MVPA intervention was more effective at improving sleep among survivors with sleep disturbances at baseline. Increasing MVPA improved sleep among cancer survivors IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Increasing MVPA among cancer survivors with sleep disturbances may be a viable strategy for improving sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01837-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Poor sleep is a long-term sequela of cancer and its treatment. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is associated with improved health outcomes among cancer survivors and has been suggested as a nonpharmacological method to improving sleep. We evaluated the efficacy of a MVPA intervention to improve sleep among cancer survivors.
Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial among 415 cancer survivors embedded within the Cancer Prevention Study-3 cohort. Survivors were randomized to a year-long, web-based MVPA program. MVPA was assessed via hip-worn actigraphy at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. We evaluated sleep through the SATED sleep health questionnaire, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale, and device-measured duration and efficiency. An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed, and secondary analyses were conducted based on measured MVPA levels with generalized additive mixed-effects models.
Results: Survivors reported similar sleep health and patterns to the general US population. We observed no significant changes to sleep between treatment groups in ITT models. Though not statistically significant, there appeared to be heterogeneity based on baseline sleep disturbance (moderate-to-severe sleep disturbance: βSATED = 0.73 (95% CI - 0.09, 1.60) vs mild-to-normal sleep disturbance: βSATED = - 0.26 (95% CI - 0.57, 0.05)). Participants that engaged in more MVPA at the end of the trial reported better sleep health (p-value = 0.04) and less sleep disturbances (p-value = 0.11).
Conclusions: The MVPA intervention was more effective at improving sleep among survivors with sleep disturbances at baseline. Increasing MVPA improved sleep among cancer survivors IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Increasing MVPA among cancer survivors with sleep disturbances may be a viable strategy for improving sleep.
期刊介绍:
Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.