Unintentional Injuries Requiring Medical Attention in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: Evidence from Nationally Representative surveys in 12 Countries.
IF 3.8 4区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Leila Ghalichi, Albertino Damasceno, David Flood, Pascal Geldsetzer, Mongal Gurung, Maja Marcus, Kibachio Joseph Mwangi, Sebastian Vollmer, Michaela Theilmann, Justine Davies
{"title":"Unintentional Injuries Requiring Medical Attention in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: Evidence from Nationally Representative surveys in 12 Countries.","authors":"Leila Ghalichi, Albertino Damasceno, David Flood, Pascal Geldsetzer, Mongal Gurung, Maja Marcus, Kibachio Joseph Mwangi, Sebastian Vollmer, Michaela Theilmann, Justine Davies","doi":"10.1007/s44197-025-00420-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite a high burden of injuries in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), a lack of empirical evidence on mechanism, location, and distribution of unintentional injuries requiring medical attention (hereafter injuries) hinders informed health system policy development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using individual-level data from nationally representative surveys conducted in LMICs between 2014-2019, we describe the weighted annual prevalence of non-fatal injuries, their mechanisms, environments in which they occur, and characteristics of people injured, in individuals aged 15-64 years. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated to evaluate associations of injuries with individual-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included data on 47,747 participants from 12 LMICs in four WHO regions. The weighted prevalence of non-fatal injuries in the past year was 6.8% (95% CI: 6.3%-7.2%); men suffered a greater prevalence of injuries than women (8.3% [95% CI 7.6%-9.0%] vs. 5.4% [95% CI 5.0%-5.9%], respectively). In the multivariable logistic regression, the odds of having any injury were lower among females and married people and higher among individuals with some primary education. Prevalence of non-road traffic collision injuries was almost threefold that of road traffic collision (RTC) injuries: 5.6% (5.2%-6.0%) vs. 1.7% (1.5%-2.0%). When considering non-RTC injuries, falls were the most common mechanism (47.0%, 95% CI 44.0%-50.1%), and homes were the most common location (38.1%, 95% CI 34.9%-41.4%), followed by road (17.9%, 95% CI 15.7%-20.4%), and workplace (17.4%, 95% CI 15.2%-19.8%). The largest proportion (23.2%, [95% CI 20.6%-25.9%]) of non-RTC injuries happened to women at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-RTC injuries, in particular falls, predominate in this population. This highlights a neglected side of injuries, many of which happen at home to women, whereas global attention tends to focus on RTCs. Data on all mechanisms of injuries and care-seeking behaviour after injuries are required for health system planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-025-00420-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite a high burden of injuries in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), a lack of empirical evidence on mechanism, location, and distribution of unintentional injuries requiring medical attention (hereafter injuries) hinders informed health system policy development.
Methods: Using individual-level data from nationally representative surveys conducted in LMICs between 2014-2019, we describe the weighted annual prevalence of non-fatal injuries, their mechanisms, environments in which they occur, and characteristics of people injured, in individuals aged 15-64 years. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated to evaluate associations of injuries with individual-level characteristics.
Results: We included data on 47,747 participants from 12 LMICs in four WHO regions. The weighted prevalence of non-fatal injuries in the past year was 6.8% (95% CI: 6.3%-7.2%); men suffered a greater prevalence of injuries than women (8.3% [95% CI 7.6%-9.0%] vs. 5.4% [95% CI 5.0%-5.9%], respectively). In the multivariable logistic regression, the odds of having any injury were lower among females and married people and higher among individuals with some primary education. Prevalence of non-road traffic collision injuries was almost threefold that of road traffic collision (RTC) injuries: 5.6% (5.2%-6.0%) vs. 1.7% (1.5%-2.0%). When considering non-RTC injuries, falls were the most common mechanism (47.0%, 95% CI 44.0%-50.1%), and homes were the most common location (38.1%, 95% CI 34.9%-41.4%), followed by road (17.9%, 95% CI 15.7%-20.4%), and workplace (17.4%, 95% CI 15.2%-19.8%). The largest proportion (23.2%, [95% CI 20.6%-25.9%]) of non-RTC injuries happened to women at home.
Conclusion: Non-RTC injuries, in particular falls, predominate in this population. This highlights a neglected side of injuries, many of which happen at home to women, whereas global attention tends to focus on RTCs. Data on all mechanisms of injuries and care-seeking behaviour after injuries are required for health system planning.
背景:尽管低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的伤害负担很高,但缺乏关于需要医疗照顾的意外伤害(以下简称伤害)的机制、地点和分布的经验证据,阻碍了知情的卫生系统政策制定。方法:利用2014-2019年在中低收入国家进行的具有全国代表性的调查的个人层面数据,我们描述了15-64岁人群中非致命伤害的加权年患病率、机制、发生环境以及受伤者的特征。估计多变量逻辑回归模型来评估损伤与个体水平特征的关联。结果:我们纳入了来自4个世卫组织区域的12个中低收入国家的47,747名参与者的数据。过去一年非致命性伤害的加权患病率为6.8% (95% CI: 6.3%-7.2%);男性的损伤发生率高于女性(分别为8.3% [95% CI 7.6%-9.0%]和5.4% [95% CI 5.0%-5.9%])。在多变量逻辑回归中,女性和已婚人士受伤的几率较低,而受过一定初等教育的人受伤的几率较高。非道路交通碰撞伤害发生率几乎是道路交通碰撞伤害发生率的三倍,分别为5.6%(5.2%-6.0%)和1.7%(1.5%-2.0%)。当考虑非rtc损伤时,跌倒是最常见的机制(47.0%,95% CI 44.0%-50.1%),家中是最常见的地点(38.1%,95% CI 34.9%-41.4%),其次是道路(17.9%,95% CI 15.7%-20.4%)和工作场所(17.4%,95% CI 15.2%-19.8%)。非rtc损伤的最大比例(23.2%,[95% CI 20.6%-25.9%])发生在女性家中。结论:非rtc损伤,尤其是跌倒,在这一人群中占主导地位。这突出了伤害的被忽视的一面,其中许多发生在妇女家中,而全球的注意力往往集中在rtc上。卫生系统规划需要关于所有伤害机制和伤害后求医行为的数据。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health is an esteemed international publication, offering a platform for peer-reviewed articles that drive advancements in global epidemiology and international health. Our mission is to shape global health policy by showcasing cutting-edge scholarship and innovative strategies.