Machine Learning Reveals the Value of Unconventional T Lymphocytes in Sepsis and Prognosis of Elderly Patients With Severe Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Tianqi Qi, Qian Gao, Yan Song, Yulin Li, Yanlan Yao, Xinyue Liu, Manyu Li, Jingxian Yang, Qi Hao
{"title":"Machine Learning Reveals the Value of Unconventional T Lymphocytes in Sepsis and Prognosis of Elderly Patients With Severe Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.","authors":"Tianqi Qi, Qian Gao, Yan Song, Yulin Li, Yanlan Yao, Xinyue Liu, Manyu Li, Jingxian Yang, Qi Hao","doi":"10.1002/jcla.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study enrolled 119 elderly patients with severe lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) and used machine learning (ML) to evaluate the predictive value of unconventional T lymphocytes (uT cells) in sepsis and 90-day prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used random forest (RF) and LASSO analyses to screen model uT cells (identified by RF-LASSO overlapping). The ML models, including LR, LDA, RandomForest, XGBoost, KNN, QDA, NaiveBayes, and ANN, were developed. These models were evaluated and compared based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two T cells were identified as factors of sepsis diagnosis: CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>+</sup>CD127dim. The LDA model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.806, AUROC of 0.771, F1 score of 0.720, and a low Brier score of 0.182. Four T cells were identified for predicting the 90-day prognosis: CD3<sup>+</sup>, CD3<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>+</sup>, CD4<sup>+</sup>CD28<sup>+</sup>, and CD4<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>+</sup>CD127dim. For the 90-day prognosis, the LDA model again performed best, with an accuracy of 0.972, F1 score of 0.952, AUROC of 0.935, and a low Brier score of 0.059.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LDA model is optimal for both diagnosing sepsis and predicting the 90-day prognosis in elderly patients with severe LRTIs. Key T-cell markers identified for sepsis include CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>+</sup>CD127dim, while the 90-day prognosis model includes CD3<sup>+</sup>, CD3<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>+</sup>, CD4<sup>+</sup>CD28<sup>+</sup>, and CD4<sup>+</sup>CD25<sup>+</sup>CD127dim T cells. These markers should be prioritized for clinical testing.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"e70065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study enrolled 119 elderly patients with severe lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) and used machine learning (ML) to evaluate the predictive value of unconventional T lymphocytes (uT cells) in sepsis and 90-day prognosis.

Methods: We used random forest (RF) and LASSO analyses to screen model uT cells (identified by RF-LASSO overlapping). The ML models, including LR, LDA, RandomForest, XGBoost, KNN, QDA, NaiveBayes, and ANN, were developed. These models were evaluated and compared based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and Brier score.

Results: Two T cells were identified as factors of sepsis diagnosis: CD3+ and CD4+CD25+CD127dim. The LDA model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.806, AUROC of 0.771, F1 score of 0.720, and a low Brier score of 0.182. Four T cells were identified for predicting the 90-day prognosis: CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD4+CD28+, and CD4+CD25+CD127dim. For the 90-day prognosis, the LDA model again performed best, with an accuracy of 0.972, F1 score of 0.952, AUROC of 0.935, and a low Brier score of 0.059.

Conclusions: The LDA model is optimal for both diagnosing sepsis and predicting the 90-day prognosis in elderly patients with severe LRTIs. Key T-cell markers identified for sepsis include CD3+ and CD4+CD25+CD127dim, while the 90-day prognosis model includes CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD4+CD28+, and CD4+CD25+CD127dim T cells. These markers should be prioritized for clinical testing.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

机器学习揭示非常规T淋巴细胞在老年重症下呼吸道感染患者脓毒症及预后中的价值
目的:本研究纳入119例老年重症下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)患者,应用机器学习(ML)技术评估非常规T淋巴细胞(uT细胞)对脓毒症及90天预后的预测价值。方法:采用随机森林(RF)和LASSO分析筛选模型uT细胞(RF -LASSO重叠鉴定)。开发了包括LR、LDA、RandomForest、XGBoost、KNN、QDA、NaiveBayes和ANN在内的ML模型。根据准确度、精密度、召回率、F1评分、敏感性、特异性、ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)和Brier评分对这些模型进行评价和比较。结果:两种T细胞CD3+和CD4+CD25+CD127dim被确定为脓毒症的诊断因素。LDA模型的准确率为0.806,AUROC为0.771,F1评分为0.720,Brier评分为0.182。鉴定出四种T细胞预测90天预后:CD3+、CD3+CD4+、CD4+CD28+和CD4+CD25+CD127dim。对于90天的预后,LDA模型仍然表现最好,准确率为0.972,F1评分为0.952,AUROC为0.935,低Brier评分为0.059。结论:LDA模型对老年严重下呼吸道感染患者脓毒症的诊断和90天预后预测均有较好的效果。脓毒症的关键T细胞标志物包括CD3+和CD4+CD25+CD127dim,而90天预后模型包括CD3+、CD3+CD4+、CD4+CD28+和CD4+CD25+CD127dim T细胞。这些标记物应优先用于临床检测。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信