Emma V Thorley, Jennifer Hatch, Monica Li, Sharlene N Mashida, Elio Castagnola, Alessio Mesini, Thomas Lehrnbecher, Andreas H Groll, Adilia Warris, Laura Ferreras-Antolin
{"title":"Liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis in paediatrics: a systematic review.","authors":"Emma V Thorley, Jennifer Hatch, Monica Li, Sharlene N Mashida, Elio Castagnola, Alessio Mesini, Thomas Lehrnbecher, Andreas H Groll, Adilia Warris, Laura Ferreras-Antolin","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) is widely used for prophylaxis in paediatric patients at high risk of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) but its use is off-label and there is significant variability in dosage and frequency. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the published data on prophylactic LAmB use in the paediatric population and to present the reported proportions of breakthrough IFD and the associated toxicity profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database were systematically searched for primary research reporting on the use of LAmB as prophylaxis for IFD in the paediatric population up to 7 December 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies, comprising three clinical trials, 12 cohort studies, two point-prevalence surveys and three pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, with 2015 patients were included. A total of 717 cases presented individual patient data. Breakthrough IFD occurred in 7.2% (49/676). The most recognized side effects were hypokalaemia in 23.2% (125/538) and derangement of liver function tests in 15.0% (49/327). Discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 6.0% (30/503) of patients. Of the four studies reporting PK data, two examined serum levels of LAmB, one analysed CSF levels and the remaining study peritoneal levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite widespread use of prophylactic LAmB, this systematic review highlights the paucity of paediatric data supporting its use. The heterogeneity observed in populations, dosing regimens and study design prevents conclusions being reached on its efficacy or the superiority of one dosing regimen. Overall, there is a clear need for further high-quality robust clinical data and targeted PK studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) is widely used for prophylaxis in paediatric patients at high risk of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) but its use is off-label and there is significant variability in dosage and frequency. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the published data on prophylactic LAmB use in the paediatric population and to present the reported proportions of breakthrough IFD and the associated toxicity profile.
Methods: EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database were systematically searched for primary research reporting on the use of LAmB as prophylaxis for IFD in the paediatric population up to 7 December 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Results: Twenty studies, comprising three clinical trials, 12 cohort studies, two point-prevalence surveys and three pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, with 2015 patients were included. A total of 717 cases presented individual patient data. Breakthrough IFD occurred in 7.2% (49/676). The most recognized side effects were hypokalaemia in 23.2% (125/538) and derangement of liver function tests in 15.0% (49/327). Discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 6.0% (30/503) of patients. Of the four studies reporting PK data, two examined serum levels of LAmB, one analysed CSF levels and the remaining study peritoneal levels.
Conclusions: Despite widespread use of prophylactic LAmB, this systematic review highlights the paucity of paediatric data supporting its use. The heterogeneity observed in populations, dosing regimens and study design prevents conclusions being reached on its efficacy or the superiority of one dosing regimen. Overall, there is a clear need for further high-quality robust clinical data and targeted PK studies.
背景:脂体两性霉素B (LAmB)广泛用于侵袭性真菌疾病(IFD)高风险的儿科患者的预防,但其使用是标签外的,剂量和频率存在显著差异。本系统综述的目的是评估已发表的关于儿科人群预防性使用LAmB的数据,并介绍突破性IFD的报告比例和相关的毒性概况。方法:系统检索EMBASE、Medline、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库,检索截至2023年12月7日关于在儿科人群中使用LAmB作为IFD预防的主要研究报告,并遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。结果:纳入20项研究,包括3项临床试验、12项队列研究、2项点患病率调查和3项药代动力学(PK)研究,共纳入2015例患者。共有717例患者提供了个人资料。突破性IFD发生率为7.2%(49/676)。最常见的副作用是低钾血症(23.2%)和肝功能紊乱(15.0%)(49/327)。6.0%(30/503)的患者因毒性而停药。在报告PK数据的四项研究中,两项检查了血清LAmB水平,一项分析了CSF水平,其余研究分析了腹膜水平。结论:尽管预防性LAmB广泛使用,但本系统综述强调了支持其使用的儿科数据的缺乏。在人群、给药方案和研究设计中观察到的异质性阻碍了对其有效性或一种给药方案的优越性得出结论。总的来说,显然需要进一步的高质量可靠的临床数据和有针对性的PK研究。
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.