Tolerability and Long-Term Safety of Gadolinium-Based Contrast-Enhanced Interstitial Pedal MR Lymphangiography in Patients With Lymphedema.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Andreas Henkel, Sergej Geiger, Julia Wagenpfeil, Daniel L Kuetting, Julian A Luetkens, Claus C Pieper
{"title":"Tolerability and Long-Term Safety of Gadolinium-Based Contrast-Enhanced Interstitial Pedal MR Lymphangiography in Patients With Lymphedema.","authors":"Andreas Henkel, Sergej Geiger, Julia Wagenpfeil, Daniel L Kuetting, Julian A Luetkens, Claus C Pieper","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography (CE-MRL) with pedal interstitial injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent is increasingly employed in patients with lymphedema (off-label use). However, data on short-term tolerability and possible long-term adverse effects are limited. This study aimed to report clinical experiences regarding the tolerability and long-term safety of CE-MRL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 168 patients (36 male; mean age 49.1±16.4 y) with clinically diagnosed lymphedema underwent clinically indicated CE-MRL. A total of 8 mL of diluted MR contrast agent (6 mL 1.0 mmol/mL Gadobutrol, 2 mL saline solution) was prepared. After intradermal administration of 0.2 mL local anesthetic, 1 mL of this contrast agent solution was injected intradermally into each interdigital space. To assess tolerability, patients were asked after the examination about their experience regarding remaining motionless during the examination, confinement in the MRI scanner, interdigital contrast injection, and the overall experience [5-point Likert scale (1: very easy/well tolerable, 5: very difficult/intolerable)]. Adverse events were systematically recorded during a clinical follow-up visit (≥3 mo after CE-MRL) through direct patient inquiry and inspection of the injection sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CE-MRL was technically successful in all cases. Mean clinical follow-up was 36±19 months (range: 3 to 81 mo). The ease of remaining motionless was rated as very easy or mostly easy in 98.2% of cases, the tolerability of confinement in the MRI scanner as well as tolerable or mostly tolerable in 97.6%, the contrast injection in 85.1%, and the overall experience in 97.6%. In addition, 95.8% of patients would recommend CE-MRL under similar conditions. Five patients reported transient irritation of the skin (n=3, 1.8%) and/or light interdigital pain (n=3, 1.8%) for 1 or 2 days at the injection site. No other adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CE-MRL is well tolerated and safe. Intradermal interdigital contrast injection was the most uncomfortable part of the examination, but was still well tolerated by most patients without any long-term adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001213","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography (CE-MRL) with pedal interstitial injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent is increasingly employed in patients with lymphedema (off-label use). However, data on short-term tolerability and possible long-term adverse effects are limited. This study aimed to report clinical experiences regarding the tolerability and long-term safety of CE-MRL.

Materials and methods: A total of 168 patients (36 male; mean age 49.1±16.4 y) with clinically diagnosed lymphedema underwent clinically indicated CE-MRL. A total of 8 mL of diluted MR contrast agent (6 mL 1.0 mmol/mL Gadobutrol, 2 mL saline solution) was prepared. After intradermal administration of 0.2 mL local anesthetic, 1 mL of this contrast agent solution was injected intradermally into each interdigital space. To assess tolerability, patients were asked after the examination about their experience regarding remaining motionless during the examination, confinement in the MRI scanner, interdigital contrast injection, and the overall experience [5-point Likert scale (1: very easy/well tolerable, 5: very difficult/intolerable)]. Adverse events were systematically recorded during a clinical follow-up visit (≥3 mo after CE-MRL) through direct patient inquiry and inspection of the injection sites.

Results: CE-MRL was technically successful in all cases. Mean clinical follow-up was 36±19 months (range: 3 to 81 mo). The ease of remaining motionless was rated as very easy or mostly easy in 98.2% of cases, the tolerability of confinement in the MRI scanner as well as tolerable or mostly tolerable in 97.6%, the contrast injection in 85.1%, and the overall experience in 97.6%. In addition, 95.8% of patients would recommend CE-MRL under similar conditions. Five patients reported transient irritation of the skin (n=3, 1.8%) and/or light interdigital pain (n=3, 1.8%) for 1 or 2 days at the injection site. No other adverse events were observed.

Conclusion: CE-MRL is well tolerated and safe. Intradermal interdigital contrast injection was the most uncomfortable part of the examination, but was still well tolerated by most patients without any long-term adverse events.

基于钆增强间质性足部磁共振淋巴管造影治疗淋巴水肿患者的耐受性和长期安全性。
目的:对比增强磁共振淋巴管造影(CE-MRL)与足部间质注射钆造影剂越来越多地用于淋巴水肿患者(非标签使用)。然而,关于短期耐受性和可能的长期副作用的数据有限。本研究旨在报告CE-MRL的耐受性和长期安全性的临床经验。材料与方法:共168例患者(男性36例;平均年龄49.1±16.4岁,经临床诊断为淋巴水肿者行CE-MRL检查。共配制稀释MR造影剂8 mL (1.0 mmol/mL Gadobutrol 6 mL,生理盐水2 mL)。皮内给药0.2 mL局麻药后,皮内每个指间间隙注射该对比剂溶液1 mL。为了评估耐受性,患者在检查后被问及他们在检查过程中保持静止不动、在MRI扫描仪中受限、指间对比剂注射和总体体验[5点李克特量表(1:非常容易/可以忍受,5:非常困难/无法忍受)]的经历。在临床随访期间(CE-MRL后≥3个月),通过患者直接询问和检查注射部位,系统记录不良事件。结果:CE-MRL在技术上均成功。平均临床随访36±19个月(3 ~ 81个月)。98.2%的患者静止不动的容易程度被评为非常容易或基本容易,97.6%的患者在MRI扫描仪上被评为可以忍受或基本可以忍受,85.1%的患者被评为注射造影剂,97.6%的患者被评为整体体验。此外,在类似情况下,95.8%的患者会推荐CE-MRL。5例患者报告注射部位皮肤短暂刺激(n=3, 1.8%)和/或轻微指间疼痛(n=3, 1.8%),持续1或2天。未观察到其他不良事件。结论:CE-MRL具有良好的耐受性和安全性。皮内指间注射造影剂是检查中最不舒服的部分,但大多数患者仍然耐受良好,没有任何长期不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信