A systematic review of alterations in brain activation and intensity following stroke: implications for integration and functional outcomes.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1544008
Amirul Azri, Noorazrul Yahya, Umi Nabilah Ismail, Muhammad Aminuddin Ashari, Hanani Abdul Manan
{"title":"A systematic review of alterations in brain activation and intensity following stroke: implications for integration and functional outcomes.","authors":"Amirul Azri, Noorazrul Yahya, Umi Nabilah Ismail, Muhammad Aminuddin Ashari, Hanani Abdul Manan","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1544008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke remains a leading cause of disability, making it critical to understand the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms for effective rehabilitation. Task-based functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides valuable insights into brain activation patterns; however, its correlation with clinical evaluations is not yet fully understood. This systematic review aims to explore the relationship between task-based fMRI findings and clinical assessments in stroke patients, comparing them to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PubMed database and adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we identified and analyzed 11 eligible studies. Total participant is 323 participant with 258 of them is stroke patients and 65 is HC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results reveal significant differences in brain activation patterns between stroke patients and healthy controls, with stroke patients displaying compensatory hyperactivation in certain brain regions such as cerebellum, inferior parietal cortex, and contralesional area. Additionally, longitudinal comparisons among stroke patients show notable improvements in activation patterns from baseline to the subacute and chronic stages following rehabilitation. These changes align with enhanced clinical outcomes, suggesting that fMRI may serve as a sensitive biomarker for recovery progress. Importantly, correlations between fMRI results and clinical scores highlight the potential of task-based fMRI to inform and refine rehabilitation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review underscores the value of integrating fMRI findings into clinical practice to better understand stroke recovery mechanisms. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of these associations and optimize patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1544008"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1544008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke remains a leading cause of disability, making it critical to understand the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms for effective rehabilitation. Task-based functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides valuable insights into brain activation patterns; however, its correlation with clinical evaluations is not yet fully understood. This systematic review aims to explore the relationship between task-based fMRI findings and clinical assessments in stroke patients, comparing them to healthy controls.

Methods: Using the PubMed database and adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we identified and analyzed 11 eligible studies. Total participant is 323 participant with 258 of them is stroke patients and 65 is HC.

Results: Results reveal significant differences in brain activation patterns between stroke patients and healthy controls, with stroke patients displaying compensatory hyperactivation in certain brain regions such as cerebellum, inferior parietal cortex, and contralesional area. Additionally, longitudinal comparisons among stroke patients show notable improvements in activation patterns from baseline to the subacute and chronic stages following rehabilitation. These changes align with enhanced clinical outcomes, suggesting that fMRI may serve as a sensitive biomarker for recovery progress. Importantly, correlations between fMRI results and clinical scores highlight the potential of task-based fMRI to inform and refine rehabilitation strategies.

Conclusion: This review underscores the value of integrating fMRI findings into clinical practice to better understand stroke recovery mechanisms. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of these associations and optimize patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.

脑卒中后脑激活和强度改变的系统回顾:对整合和功能结果的影响。
背景:脑卒中仍然是致残的主要原因,因此了解有效康复的潜在神经生理机制至关重要。基于任务的功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)为大脑激活模式提供了有价值的见解;然而,其与临床评价的相关性尚不完全清楚。本系统综述旨在探讨基于任务的功能磁共振成像结果与脑卒中患者临床评估之间的关系,并将其与健康对照进行比较。方法:使用PubMed数据库并遵循PRISMA指南,我们确定并分析了11项符合条件的研究。共323人,其中脑卒中患者258人,HC患者65人。结果:脑卒中患者与健康对照者的脑激活模式存在显著差异,脑卒中患者在小脑、下顶叶皮层和对侧区等脑区域表现出代偿性过度激活。此外,脑卒中患者的纵向比较显示,康复后从基线到亚急性和慢性阶段的激活模式有显著改善。这些变化与增强的临床结果一致,表明fMRI可以作为恢复进展的敏感生物标志物。重要的是,功能磁共振成像结果和临床评分之间的相关性突出了基于任务的功能磁共振成像在告知和完善康复策略方面的潜力。结论:本综述强调了将fMRI结果整合到临床实践中的价值,以更好地了解脑卒中恢复机制。需要进一步的研究来加深我们对这些关联的理解,并优化卒中康复患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信