Sex differences in the rate of torque development and torque-velocity relationship are due to maximal strength only.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Francesco Salvaggio, Paolo Riccardo Brustio, Pierre Samozino, Ludovico Grossio, Alberto Rainoldi, Gennaro Boccia
{"title":"Sex differences in the rate of torque development and torque-velocity relationship are due to maximal strength only.","authors":"Francesco Salvaggio, Paolo Riccardo Brustio, Pierre Samozino, Ludovico Grossio, Alberto Rainoldi, Gennaro Boccia","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05836-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to analyse the sex differences in the rate of torque development (RTD) and torque-velocity parameters with and without normalisation for maximal voluntary torque (MVT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Right-leg knee extensors were tested in 64 healthy and active participants (31 F and 33 M). MVT and RTD were obtained under isometric conditions. Individual torque-velocity relationships were obtained using a curvilinear model on averaged torque and velocity over 80°-to-140° knee angle. Dynamic data were acquired through an incremental protocol on a leg extension machine, going from the lightest to the unmovable load despite maximal effort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent samples t test revealed (p < 0.001) that males possess greater RTD measured at 50 ms (d = -1.2), 100ms (d = -2.1) and 150ms (d = -2.3), peak RTD (d = -1.3) and MVT (d = 2.1). When normalised by MVT, the sex differences in RTD disappeared. Curvilinear hyperbolic TV relationship well-fitted (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99). In FV parameters, maximal theoretical torque (d = -1.7), maximal power (P<sub>max</sub>) (d = -2.0), and torque at P<sub>max</sub> (d = -1.7) were greater in males (p < .05), while maximal theoretical velocity (V<sub>0</sub>) and velocity at P<sub>max</sub> did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sex differences in explosiveness (i.e., rapid isometric and dynamic force production) were mainly due to greater maximal strength in males than in females. These findings suggest that, in non-sedentary people, males do not present higher contraction velocity capacities, i.e. higher maximal velocity until which muscles can produce force, than females in knee extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05836-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyse the sex differences in the rate of torque development (RTD) and torque-velocity parameters with and without normalisation for maximal voluntary torque (MVT).

Methods: Right-leg knee extensors were tested in 64 healthy and active participants (31 F and 33 M). MVT and RTD were obtained under isometric conditions. Individual torque-velocity relationships were obtained using a curvilinear model on averaged torque and velocity over 80°-to-140° knee angle. Dynamic data were acquired through an incremental protocol on a leg extension machine, going from the lightest to the unmovable load despite maximal effort.

Results: Independent samples t test revealed (p < 0.001) that males possess greater RTD measured at 50 ms (d = -1.2), 100ms (d = -2.1) and 150ms (d = -2.3), peak RTD (d = -1.3) and MVT (d = 2.1). When normalised by MVT, the sex differences in RTD disappeared. Curvilinear hyperbolic TV relationship well-fitted (R2 = 0.99). In FV parameters, maximal theoretical torque (d = -1.7), maximal power (Pmax) (d = -2.0), and torque at Pmax (d = -1.7) were greater in males (p < .05), while maximal theoretical velocity (V0) and velocity at Pmax did not differ.

Conclusions: The sex differences in explosiveness (i.e., rapid isometric and dynamic force production) were mainly due to greater maximal strength in males than in females. These findings suggest that, in non-sedentary people, males do not present higher contraction velocity capacities, i.e. higher maximal velocity until which muscles can produce force, than females in knee extension.

扭矩发展速率和扭矩-速度关系的性别差异仅取决于最大强度。
目的:本研究旨在分析在最大自主扭矩(MVT)归一化和未归一化情况下扭矩发展率(RTD)和扭矩-速度参数的性别差异。方法:对64名健康活动参与者(男31名,男33名)进行右腿膝伸肌测试。在等长条件下得到了MVT和RTD。利用平均转矩和速度在80°~ 140°膝关节角范围内的曲线模型,获得了单个转矩-速度关系。动态数据是通过在伸腿机上的增量协议获得的,从最轻的负荷到最大的努力下无法移动的负荷。结果:独立样本t检验显示(p 2 = 0.99)。在FV参数中,最大理论转矩(d = -1.7)、最大功率(Pmax) (d = -2.0)和最大转矩(d = -1.7)均大于雄性(p = 0),最大速度(Pmax)无显著差异。结论:爆发力(即快速等距和动态发力)的性别差异主要是由于男性的最大力量大于女性。这些发现表明,在不久坐的人群中,男性在膝关节伸展时并不比女性表现出更高的收缩速度能力,即肌肉产生力量之前的最大速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信