The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hu Piao, Li Wenping, Li Chengde, Li Haoming, Zhang Xiaohan, Liu Yingdi, Zhang Xuezheng, Mao Shumei
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Hu Piao, Li Wenping, Li Chengde, Li Haoming, Zhang Xiaohan, Liu Yingdi, Zhang Xuezheng, Mao Shumei","doi":"10.1007/s00228-025-03861-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combination chemotherapy of alpha-PD-1/PD-L1 has become the standard treatment option for some cancer patients. However, studies have shown that not all patients benefit from improved survival rates, especially the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (GC/GEJC) remains highly controversial. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at comparing the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in GC/GEJC patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>By searching relevant databases, RCTs published up to November 2024 were collected, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall survival (OS) and PFS were calculated. Meanwhile, the odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 6842 patients were included in seven trials. In the summary analysis of OS, compared with the chemotherapy group, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with the chemotherapy group showed significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.76-0.85; p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.71-0.81; p < 0.0001). Additionally, there were significant differences in the incidence of TRAEs (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.21-2.02; p = 0.0001) and grade 3-4 TRAEs (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.30-1.58; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When compared to chemotherapy, the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy improves survival but with higher toxicity risks, requiring careful benefit-risk evaluation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1129-1139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-025-03861-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The combination chemotherapy of alpha-PD-1/PD-L1 has become the standard treatment option for some cancer patients. However, studies have shown that not all patients benefit from improved survival rates, especially the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer (GC/GEJC) remains highly controversial. To address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at comparing the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in GC/GEJC patients.

Method: By searching relevant databases, RCTs published up to November 2024 were collected, and the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall survival (OS) and PFS were calculated. Meanwhile, the odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated.

Result: A total of 6842 patients were included in seven trials. In the summary analysis of OS, compared with the chemotherapy group, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with the chemotherapy group showed significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.76-0.85; p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.71-0.81; p < 0.0001). Additionally, there were significant differences in the incidence of TRAEs (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.21-2.02; p = 0.0001) and grade 3-4 TRAEs (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.30-1.58; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: When compared to chemotherapy, the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy improves survival but with higher toxicity risks, requiring careful benefit-risk evaluation in clinical practice.

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗与单独化疗治疗晚期或转移性胃癌或胃食管结癌的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
背景:α - pd -1/PD-L1联合化疗已成为部分癌症患者的标准治疗选择。然而,研究表明,并非所有患者都能从生存率的提高中获益,特别是在胃癌或胃食管癌(GC/GEJC)患者中,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗的无进展生存(PFS)仍然存在很大争议。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项随机对照试验(RCTs)的荟萃分析,旨在比较PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗与化疗在GC/GEJC患者中的疗效。方法:通过检索相关数据库,收集截至2024年11月发表的rct,计算总生存期(OS)和PFS的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。同时,评估治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)的优势比(OR)和95% CI。结果:7项试验共纳入6842例患者。在OS汇总分析中,与化疗组相比,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗组OS有显著改善(HR = 0.80;95% ci = 0.76-0.85;p结论:与化疗相比,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗可提高生存率,但毒性风险更高,在临床实践中需要仔细评估获益-风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信