Pedro Gil, João Quadrado Gil, Margarida Dias, Telmo Cortinhal, Nuno Alves, Andreia Rosa, Joaquim Murta
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Corneal Crosslinking Combined With Phototherapeutic Keratectomy With or Without Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy.","authors":"Pedro Gil, João Quadrado Gil, Margarida Dias, Telmo Cortinhal, Nuno Alves, Andreia Rosa, Joaquim Murta","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes between transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) with corneal crosslinking (CXL) and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) with PTK and CXL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal retrospective case-control study. Patients with progressive keratoconus submitted to either PTK-CXL or PTK and TG-PRK plus CXL (PRK-CXL) protocols were included, depending on baseline pachymetry and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Minimum follow-up of 12 months up to 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 eyes from 120 patients were included, 51.7% (n = 62) in the PTK-CXL and 48.3% (n = 58) in the PRK-CXL groups. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for logMAR CDVA (PTK-CXL: 0.36 ± 0.24; PRK-CXL: 0.47 ± 0.21; P = 0.025) and thinnest pachymetry (PTK-CXL: 436.58 ± 37.09 μm; PRK-CXL: 460.83 ± 21.90; P = 0.002). LogMAR CDVA significantly improved, with no differences between groups across all time points. But the mean improvement between the last follow-up and baseline was higher in the PRK-CXL group (PTK-CXL: -0.12 ± 0.19; PRK-CXL: -0.24 ± 0.22; P = 0.015). Maximum keratometry remained stable in the PTK-CXL (baseline: 60.82 ± 6.94D; 1 year: 60.82 ± 8.05; P = 0.993) but flattened in the PRK-CXL groups (baseline: 59.05 ± 5.97; 1 year: 54.45 ± 5.88; P < 0.001). Total and higher-order aberrations improved in both groups, but spherical aberration and coma only improved after PRK-CXL. All tomographic features remained stable across the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PTK-CXL and TG-PRK plus CXL protocols are safe and effective both at arresting the disease progression and providing visual improvement. The latter brings further corneal flattening, greater visual improvement, and less corneal aberrations. For patients with progressive keratoconus with adequate corneal thickness, we recommend combined TG-PRK plus CXL, with the PTK-CXL protocol reserved for patients with better visual acuity or thinner corneas.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes between transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) with corneal crosslinking (CXL) and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TG-PRK) with PTK and CXL.
Methods: Longitudinal retrospective case-control study. Patients with progressive keratoconus submitted to either PTK-CXL or PTK and TG-PRK plus CXL (PRK-CXL) protocols were included, depending on baseline pachymetry and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Minimum follow-up of 12 months up to 3 years.
Results: A total of 120 eyes from 120 patients were included, 51.7% (n = 62) in the PTK-CXL and 48.3% (n = 58) in the PRK-CXL groups. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for logMAR CDVA (PTK-CXL: 0.36 ± 0.24; PRK-CXL: 0.47 ± 0.21; P = 0.025) and thinnest pachymetry (PTK-CXL: 436.58 ± 37.09 μm; PRK-CXL: 460.83 ± 21.90; P = 0.002). LogMAR CDVA significantly improved, with no differences between groups across all time points. But the mean improvement between the last follow-up and baseline was higher in the PRK-CXL group (PTK-CXL: -0.12 ± 0.19; PRK-CXL: -0.24 ± 0.22; P = 0.015). Maximum keratometry remained stable in the PTK-CXL (baseline: 60.82 ± 6.94D; 1 year: 60.82 ± 8.05; P = 0.993) but flattened in the PRK-CXL groups (baseline: 59.05 ± 5.97; 1 year: 54.45 ± 5.88; P < 0.001). Total and higher-order aberrations improved in both groups, but spherical aberration and coma only improved after PRK-CXL. All tomographic features remained stable across the follow-up.
Conclusions: PTK-CXL and TG-PRK plus CXL protocols are safe and effective both at arresting the disease progression and providing visual improvement. The latter brings further corneal flattening, greater visual improvement, and less corneal aberrations. For patients with progressive keratoconus with adequate corneal thickness, we recommend combined TG-PRK plus CXL, with the PTK-CXL protocol reserved for patients with better visual acuity or thinner corneas.
期刊介绍:
For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references.
Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.