Long-Term Efficacy of Repeated Endoscopic Incision Combined with Triamcinolone Injection in Patients with Recurrent Benign Esophageal Stricture.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1007/s10620-025-09101-z
Hongyu Chen, Ying Liu, Mengnan Xu, Rui Guo, Jing Zhang, Manhua Li, Xiaopeng Zhang, Xin Yin, Bairong Li, Tao Sun, Chongxi Fan, Yanglin Pan, Shoubing Ning
{"title":"Long-Term Efficacy of Repeated Endoscopic Incision Combined with Triamcinolone Injection in Patients with Recurrent Benign Esophageal Stricture.","authors":"Hongyu Chen, Ying Liu, Mengnan Xu, Rui Guo, Jing Zhang, Manhua Li, Xiaopeng Zhang, Xin Yin, Bairong Li, Tao Sun, Chongxi Fan, Yanglin Pan, Shoubing Ning","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09101-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic incision (EI) combined with triamcinolone (TAA) injection has emerged as an effective method for treating benign esophageal stricture (BES). However, a single EI and TAA injection seems to be insufficient for long-term relief of BES in some patients, especially those with recurrent BES. Here, we aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of repeated EIs and TAA injections in patients with recurrent BES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with recurrent BES who previously underwent endoscopic dilation or EI were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent multiple EIs and TAA injections. Patients were followed for at least 12 months. The primary outcome was the rate of re-stricture at 6 months after repeated EIs and TAA injections. The secondary outcomes included the symptom relief rate, the change in Stooler's dysphagia score (0, normal swallowing; 1, semidry food intake only; 2, soft food intake only; 3, fluid only; and 4, no oral intake) and body mass index (BMI) at 6 months, and overall adverse events (AEs). The risk factors for 6-month re-stricture were identified using logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients were enrolled in this study, including 30 (41.1%) with esophagogastric anastomotic strictures, 15 (20.5%) with caustic injury-related strictures, 14 (19.2%) who developed strictures after ESD, 5 (6.8%) with esophagojejunal anastomotic strictures and 9 (12.3%) with other types of strictures. A total of 264 EIs and TAA injections were performed, with 3 (IQR: 2, 5) treatments for each patient. The 6-month re-stricture rate was 53.4%, and the 2-month, 3-month, and 12-month re-stricture rates were 43.8%, 48.0%, and 54.8%, respectively. The 2-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month dysphagia relief rates were 75.3%, 65.8%, 56.2%, and 54.8%, respectively. At 6 months after treatments, the median Stooler's dysphagia score had decreased from 4 (IQR: 4, 4) to 2 (IQR: 0, 4) (P < 0.001), and the median BMI had increased from 19.6 (IQR: 16.9, 21.8) kg/m<sup>2</sup> to 20.8 (IQR: 17.4, 22.6) kg/m<sup>2</sup> (P < 0.001). Bile reflux (OR 9.90, 95% CI: 0.99-98.43) and the number of EIs (OR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17-2.41) were independently associated with 6-month re-stricture after repeated EIs and TAA injections. Four EI-related perforations were successfully treated with a covered metal stent (n = 3) and rescue surgery (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeated EIs and TAA injections were effective and reasonably safe in managing recurrent BES. However, the long-term efficacy remains suboptimal, thus further investigations are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"3077-3088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09101-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic incision (EI) combined with triamcinolone (TAA) injection has emerged as an effective method for treating benign esophageal stricture (BES). However, a single EI and TAA injection seems to be insufficient for long-term relief of BES in some patients, especially those with recurrent BES. Here, we aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of repeated EIs and TAA injections in patients with recurrent BES.

Methods: Patients with recurrent BES who previously underwent endoscopic dilation or EI were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent multiple EIs and TAA injections. Patients were followed for at least 12 months. The primary outcome was the rate of re-stricture at 6 months after repeated EIs and TAA injections. The secondary outcomes included the symptom relief rate, the change in Stooler's dysphagia score (0, normal swallowing; 1, semidry food intake only; 2, soft food intake only; 3, fluid only; and 4, no oral intake) and body mass index (BMI) at 6 months, and overall adverse events (AEs). The risk factors for 6-month re-stricture were identified using logistic regression analysis.

Results: A total of 73 patients were enrolled in this study, including 30 (41.1%) with esophagogastric anastomotic strictures, 15 (20.5%) with caustic injury-related strictures, 14 (19.2%) who developed strictures after ESD, 5 (6.8%) with esophagojejunal anastomotic strictures and 9 (12.3%) with other types of strictures. A total of 264 EIs and TAA injections were performed, with 3 (IQR: 2, 5) treatments for each patient. The 6-month re-stricture rate was 53.4%, and the 2-month, 3-month, and 12-month re-stricture rates were 43.8%, 48.0%, and 54.8%, respectively. The 2-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month dysphagia relief rates were 75.3%, 65.8%, 56.2%, and 54.8%, respectively. At 6 months after treatments, the median Stooler's dysphagia score had decreased from 4 (IQR: 4, 4) to 2 (IQR: 0, 4) (P < 0.001), and the median BMI had increased from 19.6 (IQR: 16.9, 21.8) kg/m2 to 20.8 (IQR: 17.4, 22.6) kg/m2 (P < 0.001). Bile reflux (OR 9.90, 95% CI: 0.99-98.43) and the number of EIs (OR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17-2.41) were independently associated with 6-month re-stricture after repeated EIs and TAA injections. Four EI-related perforations were successfully treated with a covered metal stent (n = 3) and rescue surgery (n = 1).

Conclusions: Repeated EIs and TAA injections were effective and reasonably safe in managing recurrent BES. However, the long-term efficacy remains suboptimal, thus further investigations are needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

反复内镜切开联合曲安奈德注射治疗复发性食管良性狭窄的远期疗效观察。
背景与目的:内镜下切开(EI)联合曲安奈德(TAA)注射已成为治疗良性食管狭窄(BES)的有效方法。然而,对于一些患者,特别是复发性BES患者,单次EI和TAA注射似乎不足以长期缓解BES。在这里,我们的目的是研究反复注射EIs和TAA对复发性BES患者的长期疗效和安全性。方法:既往接受内镜扩张或EI治疗的复发性BES患者纳入本回顾性研究。所有患者均接受了多次EIs和TAA注射。患者随访至少12个月。主要观察指标是反复注射EIs和TAA后6个月的再狭窄率。次要结局包括症状缓解率、Stooler吞咽困难评分变化(0分,吞咽正常;1、半干性食物只摄入;2、软性食物只摄入;3、流体只;4,无口服摄入)和6个月时的体重指数(BMI),以及总体不良事件(ae)。采用logistic回归分析确定6个月再狭窄的危险因素。结果:本研究共纳入73例患者,其中食管胃吻合口狭窄30例(41.1%),苛性损伤相关狭窄15例(20.5%),ESD术后狭窄14例(19.2%),食管空肠吻合口狭窄5例(6.8%),其他类型狭窄9例(12.3%)。共进行EIs和TAA注射264次,每例3次(IQR: 2,5)。6个月再狭窄率为53.4%,2个月、3个月、12个月再狭窄率分别为43.8%、48.0%、54.8%。2个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的吞咽困难缓解率分别为75.3%、65.8%、56.2%和54.8%。治疗6个月后,Stooler吞咽困难评分中位数从4 (IQR: 4,4)降至2 (IQR: 0,4) (P值从2降至20.8 (IQR: 17.4, 22.6) kg/m2。结论:重复EIs和TAA注射治疗复发性BES有效且合理安全。然而,长期疗效仍然不理想,因此需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信