Single-cell chromatin accessibility profiling reveals regulatory mechanisms and evolution in pig brains.

IF 4.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Yue Xiang, Saixian Zhang, Yi Huang, Zhuqing Zheng, Jiahui Sun, Qiulin Zhao, Peng Zhou, Xiaolong Qi, Jingjin Li, Fuyang Xiong, Jing Xu, Shengquan Wang, Liangliang Fu, Xinyun Li
{"title":"Single-cell chromatin accessibility profiling reveals regulatory mechanisms and evolution in pig brains.","authors":"Yue Xiang, Saixian Zhang, Yi Huang, Zhuqing Zheng, Jiahui Sun, Qiulin Zhao, Peng Zhou, Xiaolong Qi, Jingjin Li, Fuyang Xiong, Jing Xu, Shengquan Wang, Liangliang Fu, Xinyun Li","doi":"10.1186/s12915-025-02263-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pig brains serve as a valuable biomedical model for studying brain-related diseases due to their significant structural similarities to the human brain. Furthermore, the long-term domestication and artificial selection of domestic pigs have profoundly shaped their brains, making them an interesting subject for research. However, a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory mechanisms governing pig brain function and their impact on various phenotypes remains elusive due to the high degree of cellular heterogeneity present in the brain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we profiled 71,798 cells from domestic pig and wild boar cerebral cortex and cerebellum, identifying nine cell types, and integrated single-cell RNA sequencing data to explore cell type-specific regulatory landscapes and oligodendrocyte developmental trajectory. Furthermore, comparative analysis of each cell type between domestic pigs and wild boars indicated that oligodendrocyte progenitor cells may potentially exhibit a faster evolutionary rate. Finally, cross-species analysis suggested that, compared to humans, the proportion of sequence-conserved and functionally conserved regulatory elements in each cell type appears to be higher in pigs than in mice. Studies on the enrichment of genetic variants associated with 15 human diseases and complex traits in conserved regulatory elements across cell types indicated that immune-related diseases were more enriched in pigs, whereas neurological diseases were somewhat more enriched in mice. However, the enrichment of Alzheimer's disease-associated variants in pigs but not in mice suggests that pigs could be a more suitable model for this condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research offers preliminary insights into the heterogeneity of pig brains and suggests the potential underlying regulatory mechanisms. Additionally, we explore the possible impact of nervous system differences on phenotypic changes, which could lay the groundwork for further biomedical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9339,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02263-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pig brains serve as a valuable biomedical model for studying brain-related diseases due to their significant structural similarities to the human brain. Furthermore, the long-term domestication and artificial selection of domestic pigs have profoundly shaped their brains, making them an interesting subject for research. However, a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory mechanisms governing pig brain function and their impact on various phenotypes remains elusive due to the high degree of cellular heterogeneity present in the brain.

Results: In this study, we profiled 71,798 cells from domestic pig and wild boar cerebral cortex and cerebellum, identifying nine cell types, and integrated single-cell RNA sequencing data to explore cell type-specific regulatory landscapes and oligodendrocyte developmental trajectory. Furthermore, comparative analysis of each cell type between domestic pigs and wild boars indicated that oligodendrocyte progenitor cells may potentially exhibit a faster evolutionary rate. Finally, cross-species analysis suggested that, compared to humans, the proportion of sequence-conserved and functionally conserved regulatory elements in each cell type appears to be higher in pigs than in mice. Studies on the enrichment of genetic variants associated with 15 human diseases and complex traits in conserved regulatory elements across cell types indicated that immune-related diseases were more enriched in pigs, whereas neurological diseases were somewhat more enriched in mice. However, the enrichment of Alzheimer's disease-associated variants in pigs but not in mice suggests that pigs could be a more suitable model for this condition.

Conclusions: Our research offers preliminary insights into the heterogeneity of pig brains and suggests the potential underlying regulatory mechanisms. Additionally, we explore the possible impact of nervous system differences on phenotypic changes, which could lay the groundwork for further biomedical studies.

单细胞染色质可及性分析揭示了猪脑的调节机制和进化。
背景:猪脑与人脑结构相似,是研究脑相关疾病的重要生物医学模型。此外,家猪的长期驯化和人工选择已经深刻地塑造了它们的大脑,使它们成为一个有趣的研究对象。然而,由于大脑中存在高度的细胞异质性,对猪脑功能的调控机制及其对各种表型的影响的全面理解仍然难以捉摸。结果:本研究分析了71798个家猪和野猪大脑皮层和小脑细胞,鉴定出9种细胞类型,并整合单细胞RNA测序数据,探索细胞类型特异性调控景观和少突胶质细胞发育轨迹。此外,对家猪和野猪各细胞类型的比较分析表明,少突胶质祖细胞可能表现出更快的进化速度。最后,跨物种分析表明,与人类相比,每种细胞类型中序列保守和功能保守的调控元件在猪中的比例似乎高于小鼠。对与15种人类疾病和保守调控元件复杂性状相关的遗传变异在不同细胞类型中的富集研究表明,免疫相关疾病在猪中富集较多,而神经系统疾病在小鼠中富集较多。然而,阿尔茨海默病相关变异在猪身上的富集,而在小鼠身上却没有,这表明猪可能是更适合这种情况的模型。结论:我们的研究为猪大脑的异质性提供了初步的见解,并提出了潜在的潜在调节机制。此外,我们还探讨了神经系统差异对表型变化的可能影响,为进一步的生物医学研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Biology
BMC Biology 生物-生物学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.90%
发文量
260
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biology is a broad scope journal covering all areas of biology. Our content includes research articles, new methods and tools. BMC Biology also publishes reviews, Q&A, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信