Viable Spore-Forming Obligate Anaerobes Are Rare in Pasteurized Donor Human Milk: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tong Wu, Laura D Klein, Scott Markham, Richard Brown, Christine Sulfaro, Vanessa Clifford
{"title":"Viable Spore-Forming Obligate Anaerobes Are Rare in Pasteurized Donor Human Milk: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Tong Wu, Laura D Klein, Scott Markham, Richard Brown, Christine Sulfaro, Vanessa Clifford","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2025.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> When access to mother's own milk is limited, pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) is the best alternative source of nutrition for high-risk preterm infants. Microbial screening of PDHM is essential to ensure its safety, as spore-forming bacteria may survive pasteurization. Standard screening will detect spore-forming bacteria that grow aerobically, such as <i>Bacillus cereus,</i> but may miss obligate anaerobes, such as <i>Clostridium</i> species. Although milk banking guidelines globally recommend microbial screening of milk batches, they do not specifically recommend anaerobic testing. This study aimed to determine the proportion of PDHM batches containing viable anaerobic bacteria after pasteurization. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In this prospective cohort study, 150 batches of PDHM from unique donors were sampled (August-December 2024) at Australian Red Cross Lifeblood and tested at an accredited food safety laboratory. Prepasteurization samples were tested for aerobic bacteria, and postpasteurization samples were tested for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using a validated method (detection limit ≤1 CFU/mL). <b><i>Results:</i></b> No bacteria were recovered from any of the 150 postpasteurization samples tested using an anaerobic culture method. Using standard aerobic culture, 4.7% (7/150) of samples failed prepasteurization microbial screening according to local acceptance guidelines, due to a total colony count ≥ 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL (<i>n</i> = 6) and/or the presence of Enterobacteriaceae ≥ 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL (<i>n</i> = 3), and none failed postpasteurization testing. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study confirmed that obligate anaerobic bacteria are rarely cultured from PDHM. Additional process control through routine testing for anaerobes in PDHM is therefore not considered essential, particularly when PDHM is stored frozen (<18°C) after pasteurization. Clinicians should maintain vigilance for potential recipient adverse events and promptly report these to the source milk bank.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2025.0062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When access to mother's own milk is limited, pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) is the best alternative source of nutrition for high-risk preterm infants. Microbial screening of PDHM is essential to ensure its safety, as spore-forming bacteria may survive pasteurization. Standard screening will detect spore-forming bacteria that grow aerobically, such as Bacillus cereus, but may miss obligate anaerobes, such as Clostridium species. Although milk banking guidelines globally recommend microbial screening of milk batches, they do not specifically recommend anaerobic testing. This study aimed to determine the proportion of PDHM batches containing viable anaerobic bacteria after pasteurization. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 150 batches of PDHM from unique donors were sampled (August-December 2024) at Australian Red Cross Lifeblood and tested at an accredited food safety laboratory. Prepasteurization samples were tested for aerobic bacteria, and postpasteurization samples were tested for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using a validated method (detection limit ≤1 CFU/mL). Results: No bacteria were recovered from any of the 150 postpasteurization samples tested using an anaerobic culture method. Using standard aerobic culture, 4.7% (7/150) of samples failed prepasteurization microbial screening according to local acceptance guidelines, due to a total colony count ≥ 105 CFU/mL (n = 6) and/or the presence of Enterobacteriaceae ≥ 104 CFU/mL (n = 3), and none failed postpasteurization testing. Conclusions: This study confirmed that obligate anaerobic bacteria are rarely cultured from PDHM. Additional process control through routine testing for anaerobes in PDHM is therefore not considered essential, particularly when PDHM is stored frozen (<18°C) after pasteurization. Clinicians should maintain vigilance for potential recipient adverse events and promptly report these to the source milk bank.

在巴氏灭菌的供体母乳中,能形成孢子的专性厌氧菌是罕见的:一项初步研究。
背景:当获得母亲自己的母乳是有限的,巴氏消毒供体母乳(PDHM)是最好的替代营养来源,为高危早产儿。PDHM的微生物筛选对确保其安全性至关重要,因为孢子形成细菌可以在巴氏灭菌中存活。标准筛选将检测到需氧生长的孢子形成细菌,如蜡样芽孢杆菌,但可能会遗漏专性厌氧细菌,如梭状芽孢杆菌。尽管全球牛奶库指南推荐对牛奶批次进行微生物筛选,但它们并没有特别推荐厌氧测试。本研究旨在确定巴氏灭菌后含活厌氧菌的PDHM批次的比例。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,从澳大利亚红十字会生命血液中心(Australian Red Cross Lifeblood)抽取150批来自独特献血者的PDHM,并在一家认可的食品安全实验室进行检测。采用经验证的方法(检出限≤1 CFU/mL)对巴氏灭菌前样品进行好氧菌检测,对巴氏灭菌后样品进行好氧菌和厌氧菌检测。结果:使用厌氧培养法测试的150个巴氏消毒后样品中没有回收细菌。使用标准有氧培养,根据当地验收指南,4.7%(7/150)的样品未通过巴氏灭菌前微生物筛选,原因是总菌落计数≥105 CFU/mL (n = 6)和/或存在Enterobacteriaceae≥104 CFU/mL (n = 3),并且没有未通过巴氏灭菌后检测。结论:本研究证实从PDHM中培养的专性厌氧菌很少。因此,通过常规测试PDHM中的厌氧菌来进行额外的过程控制是不必要的,特别是当PDHM被冷冻储存时(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信