Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire: reliability generalization meta-analysis of Cronbach's alpha.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kalyana C Pentapati, Deepika Chenna, Vijay S Kumar, Nanditha Kumar, Mithun Pai, Saurabh Kumar
{"title":"Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire: reliability generalization meta-analysis of Cronbach's alpha.","authors":"Kalyana C Pentapati, Deepika Chenna, Vijay S Kumar, Nanditha Kumar, Mithun Pai, Saurabh Kumar","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06342-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarise the estimates of Cronbach's α for the Child Impact Section (CIS), Family Impact Section (FIS), and total Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) and to identify the significant predictors that may influence the pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Dentistry and Oral Science Source, and CINAHL from inception until 21st November 2024. Included were those reported in English with Cronbach's α values for the ECOHIS or its subscales. Abstracts, conference proceedings, letters to editors, pilot studies, brief communications, and commentary were omitted. Two review authors independently reviewed the title and abstracts and full-text. Data extraction included demographic characteristics, language, study design and setting, sampling, Cronbach's α, and questionnaire item count. COSMIN checklist was used for quality assessment and \"Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis\" (RGMA) was conducted to estimate the internal consistency of ECOHIS questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1,524 publications were retrieved, of which 454 and 304 were available for screening title and abstracts and full texts respectively. Among the included 66 publications, 74 estimates were obtained. The pooled Cronbach's α for the total scale was 0.86 with high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 95.43). No significant impact of moderators was seen on the pooled estimate. Subgroup analysis showed little variation in the pooled estimates for continent, language, study setting, study design, and type of sampling. Only 46 estimates were included for the RGMA of CIS (0.85) and FIS (0.79). No significant effects of moderators were seen on the pooled Cronbach's α for both CIS and FIS. Similarly, subgroup analysis showed little variation in the pooled estimates for the CIS and FIS for various categorical predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pooled Cronbach's α of ECOHIS and its sub-scales were higher than the acceptable benchmark with no effect of moderators.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06342-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To summarise the estimates of Cronbach's α for the Child Impact Section (CIS), Family Impact Section (FIS), and total Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) and to identify the significant predictors that may influence the pooled estimates.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Dentistry and Oral Science Source, and CINAHL from inception until 21st November 2024. Included were those reported in English with Cronbach's α values for the ECOHIS or its subscales. Abstracts, conference proceedings, letters to editors, pilot studies, brief communications, and commentary were omitted. Two review authors independently reviewed the title and abstracts and full-text. Data extraction included demographic characteristics, language, study design and setting, sampling, Cronbach's α, and questionnaire item count. COSMIN checklist was used for quality assessment and "Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis" (RGMA) was conducted to estimate the internal consistency of ECOHIS questionnaire.

Results: Overall, 1,524 publications were retrieved, of which 454 and 304 were available for screening title and abstracts and full texts respectively. Among the included 66 publications, 74 estimates were obtained. The pooled Cronbach's α for the total scale was 0.86 with high heterogeneity (I2 = 95.43). No significant impact of moderators was seen on the pooled estimate. Subgroup analysis showed little variation in the pooled estimates for continent, language, study setting, study design, and type of sampling. Only 46 estimates were included for the RGMA of CIS (0.85) and FIS (0.79). No significant effects of moderators were seen on the pooled Cronbach's α for both CIS and FIS. Similarly, subgroup analysis showed little variation in the pooled estimates for the CIS and FIS for various categorical predictors.

Conclusion: The pooled Cronbach's α of ECOHIS and its sub-scales were higher than the acceptable benchmark with no effect of moderators.

幼儿口腔健康影响量表(ECOHIS)问卷:Cronbach's alpha的信度概化元分析。
目的:总结儿童影响部分(CIS)、家庭影响部分(FIS)和儿童早期口腔健康影响量表(ECOHIS)的Cronbach's α估计值,并确定可能影响汇总估计值的重要预测因子。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Web of Sciences、Dentistry and Oral Science Source和CINAHL,检索时间为2024年11月21日。纳入以英文报告的ECOHIS或其分量表Cronbach’s α值。摘要、会议记录、给编辑的信、初步研究、简短通讯和评论被省略。两位综述作者独立审阅了标题、摘要和全文。数据提取包括人口统计学特征、语言、研究设计和设置、抽样、Cronbach’s α和问卷项目数。采用COSMIN检查表进行质量评价,采用“信度概化荟萃分析”(RGMA)评估ECOHIS问卷的内部一致性。结果:共检索文献1524篇,其中筛选标题、摘要和全文的文献分别为454篇和304篇。在所列66份出版物中,获得74份估计数。总量表的合并Cronbach's α为0.86,异质性较高(I2 = 95.43)。调节因子对汇总估计没有显著影响。亚组分析显示,在大陆、语言、研究环境、研究设计和抽样类型的汇总估计中几乎没有变化。只有46个估计包括CIS(0.85)和FIS(0.79)的RGMA。调节因子对CIS和FIS的综合Cronbach's α均无显著影响。同样,亚组分析显示,对于各种分类预测因子,CIS和FIS的汇总估计几乎没有变化。结论:ECOHIS及其子量表的综合Cronbach’s α均高于可接受基准,调节因子无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信