Traditional serrated adenomas associated with risk of subsequent high-risk polyps and colorectal cancer.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yufeng Chen, Georgios Polychronidis, Yueyang Zhang, Jiaxian Shen, Yujia Lu, Mengxi Du, Mingyang Song
{"title":"Traditional serrated adenomas associated with risk of subsequent high-risk polyps and colorectal cancer.","authors":"Yufeng Chen, Georgios Polychronidis, Yueyang Zhang, Jiaxian Shen, Yujia Lu, Mengxi Du, Mingyang Song","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) is a rare yet established precursor to colorectal cancer (CRC). The risk of colorectal neoplasia after TSA removal remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified participants without polyps or with TSAs during index colonoscopy from the Mass General Brigham Colonoscopy Cohort (2007-2023). Participants were prospectively followed for recurrence of high-risk polyps and incidence of CRC. We used time-varying multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the risk of CRC and high-risk polyps associated with baseline diagnosis of TSAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 109,218 participants without polyps and 252 with TSAs, of whom 35,124 (32%) and 139 (55%) had undergone a follow-up colonoscopy, respectively. TSAs were predominantly located in the distal colon (35%) and rectum (38%), with approximately half sized <10mm. TSAs tended to demonstrate as a single lesion (84%) but coexist with other types of polyps (70%). Compared to participants without polyps, those with TSAs had higher risk of developing high-risk polyps, high-risk adenomas, high-risk serrated polyps, and CRC, with the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.31 (2.35-4.66), 3.07 (2.12-4.44), 6.66 (3.79-11.71), and 7.23 (2.23-23.44), respectively. The risk elevation of high-risk polyps peaked at three years post-TSA removal (HR=10.85, 95% CI, 6.36-18.52). Among recurrent polyps following TSA removal, 54% (52/96) occurred in the proximal colon and 69% (66/96) were serrated polyps.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with TSA removal had an elevated risk of colorectal neoplasia, particularly within three years following TSA removal, supporting the current U.S. recommendations for a surveillance colonoscopy at three years.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003588","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) is a rare yet established precursor to colorectal cancer (CRC). The risk of colorectal neoplasia after TSA removal remains unclear.

Methods: We identified participants without polyps or with TSAs during index colonoscopy from the Mass General Brigham Colonoscopy Cohort (2007-2023). Participants were prospectively followed for recurrence of high-risk polyps and incidence of CRC. We used time-varying multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the risk of CRC and high-risk polyps associated with baseline diagnosis of TSAs.

Results: We identified 109,218 participants without polyps and 252 with TSAs, of whom 35,124 (32%) and 139 (55%) had undergone a follow-up colonoscopy, respectively. TSAs were predominantly located in the distal colon (35%) and rectum (38%), with approximately half sized <10mm. TSAs tended to demonstrate as a single lesion (84%) but coexist with other types of polyps (70%). Compared to participants without polyps, those with TSAs had higher risk of developing high-risk polyps, high-risk adenomas, high-risk serrated polyps, and CRC, with the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.31 (2.35-4.66), 3.07 (2.12-4.44), 6.66 (3.79-11.71), and 7.23 (2.23-23.44), respectively. The risk elevation of high-risk polyps peaked at three years post-TSA removal (HR=10.85, 95% CI, 6.36-18.52). Among recurrent polyps following TSA removal, 54% (52/96) occurred in the proximal colon and 69% (66/96) were serrated polyps.

Discussion: Patients with TSA removal had an elevated risk of colorectal neoplasia, particularly within three years following TSA removal, supporting the current U.S. recommendations for a surveillance colonoscopy at three years.

传统的锯齿状腺瘤与随后的高风险息肉和结直肠癌的风险相关。
传统的锯齿状腺瘤(TSA)是一种罕见但已确定的结直肠癌(CRC)的前兆。TSA切除后结直肠肿瘤的风险尚不清楚。方法:我们从麻省总医院布里格姆结肠镜检查队列(2007-2023)中筛选了在指数结肠镜检查期间没有息肉或tsa的参与者。对参与者进行前瞻性随访,观察高危息肉的复发和结直肠癌的发生率。我们使用时变多变量调整的Cox比例风险模型来估计与基线tsa诊断相关的结直肠癌和高危息肉的风险。结果:我们确定了109,218名没有息肉的参与者和252名有tsa的参与者,其中35124名(32%)和139名(55%)分别接受了随访结肠镜检查。TSA主要位于远端结肠(35%)和直肠(38%),大小约为一半。讨论:切除TSA的患者发生结直肠瘤变的风险增加,特别是在TSA切除后的三年内,支持目前美国建议的三年监测结肠镜检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信