MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for AUD: Bayesian analysis of WHO drinking risk level and exploratory analysis of drinking behavior and psychosocial functioning at 3 months follow-up.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Hannah Thurgur, Ben Sessa, Laurie Higbed, Steve O'Brien, Claire Durant, Sue Wilson, Balázs Szigeti, Celia J A Morgan, David J Nutt
{"title":"MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for AUD: Bayesian analysis of WHO drinking risk level and exploratory analysis of drinking behavior and psychosocial functioning at 3 months follow-up.","authors":"Hannah Thurgur, Ben Sessa, Laurie Higbed, Steve O'Brien, Claire Durant, Sue Wilson, Balázs Szigeti, Celia J A Morgan, David J Nutt","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Safety and tolerability data from the first open-label feasibility study of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for alcohol use disorder was recently published. This paper presents a Bayesian analysis of the impact of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy on treatment success, defined as 2-level reduction in the World Health Organization (WHO) drinking risk at the 3 months follow-up. We also examined the impact on drinking behavior and psychosocial measures at 3 months compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen participants with a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder who had recently undergone detoxification completed an eight-week course of ten psychotherapy sessions, including two sessions with MDMA. Measures assessing drinking behavior, quality of life, sleep, self-compassion, and empathy were collected. Bayesian analysis using flat and skeptical priors was performed to determine treatment success defined as a 2-level reduction in WHO drinking risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bayesian analysis suggested that the probability of a 2-level reduction in WHO drinking risk from baseline to 3 months post-treatment is 55%-63%, based upon either a flat or skeptical prior respectively. We present preliminary findings suggesting reductions in alcohol craving (measured by the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale and Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale) and improvements in sleep and aspects of psychosocial functioning at 3 months follow-up compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Bayesian analysis provides a useful harm reduction endpoint interpretation of drinking in terms of a 2-level reduction in WHO drinking risk. Further findings provide preliminary insights into the potential impact of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy on quality of life and well-being in addition to reductions in drinking. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04158778.</p>","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaf031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Safety and tolerability data from the first open-label feasibility study of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for alcohol use disorder was recently published. This paper presents a Bayesian analysis of the impact of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy on treatment success, defined as 2-level reduction in the World Health Organization (WHO) drinking risk at the 3 months follow-up. We also examined the impact on drinking behavior and psychosocial measures at 3 months compared to baseline.

Methods: Fourteen participants with a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder who had recently undergone detoxification completed an eight-week course of ten psychotherapy sessions, including two sessions with MDMA. Measures assessing drinking behavior, quality of life, sleep, self-compassion, and empathy were collected. Bayesian analysis using flat and skeptical priors was performed to determine treatment success defined as a 2-level reduction in WHO drinking risk.

Results: Bayesian analysis suggested that the probability of a 2-level reduction in WHO drinking risk from baseline to 3 months post-treatment is 55%-63%, based upon either a flat or skeptical prior respectively. We present preliminary findings suggesting reductions in alcohol craving (measured by the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale and Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale) and improvements in sleep and aspects of psychosocial functioning at 3 months follow-up compared to baseline.

Conclusions: The Bayesian analysis provides a useful harm reduction endpoint interpretation of drinking in terms of a 2-level reduction in WHO drinking risk. Further findings provide preliminary insights into the potential impact of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy on quality of life and well-being in addition to reductions in drinking. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04158778.

mdma辅助心理治疗AUD: 3个月随访时WHO饮酒风险水平的贝叶斯分析和饮酒行为和心理社会功能的探索性分析。
目的:最近发表了3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)辅助心理治疗酒精使用障碍的首次开放标签可行性研究的安全性和耐受性数据。本文对mdma辅助心理治疗对治疗成功的影响进行了贝叶斯分析,治疗成功的定义是在3个月的随访中将世界卫生组织(WHO)的饮酒风险降低了2个级别。与基线相比,我们还检查了3个月时对饮酒行为和心理社会测量的影响。方法:14名被诊断为酒精使用障碍的参与者最近接受了解毒治疗,他们完成了为期8周的10次心理治疗课程,其中包括两次服用MDMA。收集了评估饮酒行为、生活质量、睡眠、自我同情和同理心的措施。使用平坦和怀疑先验进行贝叶斯分析,以确定治疗成功定义为WHO饮酒风险降低2级。结果:贝叶斯分析表明,从基线到治疗后3个月WHO饮酒风险降低2个水平的概率为55%-63%,分别基于平淡或怀疑的先验。我们提出的初步研究结果表明,与基线相比,在3个月的随访中,酒精渴望减少(通过宾夕法尼亚酒精渴望量表和强迫性饮酒量表测量),睡眠和心理社会功能方面得到改善。结论:贝叶斯分析提供了一个有用的危害降低终点解释,即WHO饮酒风险降低2级。进一步的研究结果提供了mdma辅助心理治疗对生活质量和健康的潜在影响的初步见解,除了减少饮酒。ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04158778。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信