Adverse Outcomes Associated With Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Overuse in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 12.6 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Allergy Pub Date : 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1111/all.16538
Chia-Ling Tsao, Shu-Yen Chan, Meng-Hsun Lee, Tina Yi Jin Hsieh, Wanda Phipatanakul, Hana B Ruran, Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma
{"title":"Adverse Outcomes Associated With Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Overuse in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chia-Ling Tsao, Shu-Yen Chan, Meng-Hsun Lee, Tina Yi Jin Hsieh, Wanda Phipatanakul, Hana B Ruran, Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma","doi":"10.1111/all.16538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2019 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) report no longer recommended short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) monotherapy due to associated complications and a lack of anti-inflammatory properties. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate adverse outcomes associated with SABA overuse in patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies on SABA overuse (≥ 3 SABA canisters/year) in patients with asthma, from 1981 to November 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous measures of all-cause mortality and acute exacerbations using random-effects models and Mantel-Haenszel weighting. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on study design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 626 records, 27 studies (2 RCTs, 1 prospective cohort study, 12 retrospective cohort studies, and 12 cross-sectional studies) were included. SABA overuse (≥ 3 SABA canisters/year) was associated with significantly higher mortality (2743 of 130,629 in the overuse group versus 3534 of 300,451 in controls; RR = 2.04, 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.37-3.04; p < 0.001) and a significantly higher rate of acute exacerbations (60,320 of 165,271 in the overuse group versus 84,439 of 376,845 in controls; RR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.24-3.03; p < 0.001). An increased risk of acute exacerbations was observed in retrospective cohort studies (RR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.43-2.47; p < 0.001) and cross-sectional studies (RR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.04-4.77; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SABA overuse was associated with increased rates of mortality and acute exacerbations in patients with asthma, supporting guidelines that advise against SABA monotherapy in asthma management.</p>","PeriodicalId":122,"journal":{"name":"Allergy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/all.16538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 2019 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) report no longer recommended short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) monotherapy due to associated complications and a lack of anti-inflammatory properties. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate adverse outcomes associated with SABA overuse in patients with asthma.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies on SABA overuse (≥ 3 SABA canisters/year) in patients with asthma, from 1981 to November 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous measures of all-cause mortality and acute exacerbations using random-effects models and Mantel-Haenszel weighting. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on study design.

Results: Out of 626 records, 27 studies (2 RCTs, 1 prospective cohort study, 12 retrospective cohort studies, and 12 cross-sectional studies) were included. SABA overuse (≥ 3 SABA canisters/year) was associated with significantly higher mortality (2743 of 130,629 in the overuse group versus 3534 of 300,451 in controls; RR = 2.04, 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.37-3.04; p < 0.001) and a significantly higher rate of acute exacerbations (60,320 of 165,271 in the overuse group versus 84,439 of 376,845 in controls; RR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.24-3.03; p < 0.001). An increased risk of acute exacerbations was observed in retrospective cohort studies (RR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.43-2.47; p < 0.001) and cross-sectional studies (RR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.04-4.77; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: SABA overuse was associated with increased rates of mortality and acute exacerbations in patients with asthma, supporting guidelines that advise against SABA monotherapy in asthma management.

哮喘患者过度使用短效β激动剂的不良后果:系统回顾和荟萃分析
2019年全球哮喘倡议(GINA)报告不再推荐短效β受体激动剂(SABA)单药治疗,原因是相关并发症和缺乏抗炎特性。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估哮喘患者过度使用SABA相关的不良后果。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库,检索1981年至2023年11月哮喘患者SABA过度使用(≥3罐/年)的研究。包括随机对照试验(rct)、队列研究和横断面研究。采用随机效应模型和Mantel-Haenszel加权计算全因死亡率和急性加重的二分类测量的合并风险比(rr)。根据研究设计进行亚组分析。结果:在626份记录中,纳入了27项研究(2项随机对照试验、1项前瞻性队列研究、12项回顾性队列研究和12项横断面研究)。SABA过度使用(≥3罐/年)与死亡率显著升高相关(过度使用组130,629人中有2743人,对照组300,451人中有3534人;RR = 2.04, 95%可信区间,CI = 1.37 ~ 3.04;结论:SABA的过度使用与哮喘患者死亡率和急性加重率的增加有关,支持了在哮喘治疗中反对SABA单药治疗的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Allergy
Allergy 医学-过敏
CiteScore
26.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
393
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Allergy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance, impact, and communicate all aspects of the discipline of Allergy/Immunology. It publishes original articles, reviews, position papers, guidelines, editorials, news and commentaries, letters to the editors, and correspondences. The journal accepts articles based on their scientific merit and quality. Allergy seeks to maintain contact between basic and clinical Allergy/Immunology and encourages contributions from contributors and readers from all countries. In addition to its publication, Allergy also provides abstracting and indexing information. Some of the databases that include Allergy abstracts are Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Disease, Academic Search Alumni Edition, AgBiotech News & Information, AGRICOLA Database, Biological Abstracts, PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset, and Global Health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信