Stakeholder-driven management strategies for recovering large herbivores

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Sophia Hibler, Christian Kiffner, Hannes J. König, Niels Blaum, Emu-Felicitas Ostermann-Miyashita
{"title":"Stakeholder-driven management strategies for recovering large herbivores","authors":"Sophia Hibler,&nbsp;Christian Kiffner,&nbsp;Hannes J. König,&nbsp;Niels Blaum,&nbsp;Emu-Felicitas Ostermann-Miyashita","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In modern landscapes, the sustainable coexistence of humans and wildlife depends on involving stakeholders in the development and implementation of management strategies. This is particularly important for species like the European bison (<i>Bison bonasus</i>) and Eurasian moose (<i>Alces alces</i>), which are reoccupying regions between Germany and Poland after a prolonged absence. The return of these species generates mixed emotions, as interactions with these species are associated with both costs and benefits to people. Addressing the apparent unpreparedness in managing these trade-offs, we implemented a digital participatory impact assessment in two steps. First, we engaged bison and moose experts to develop management scenarios and assessment criteria. Then, in a subsequent virtual workshop, stakeholders evaluated four scenarios along economic, social, and ecological dimensions. Quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed divergent perspectives and priorities, yet consensus emerged on the necessary future steps: formulating a comprehensive management strategy with guidelines and protocols for managing specific conflict scenarios, such as the incursion of large herbivores onto highways. Our approach underscores the importance of early stakeholder engagement in fostering a more equitable and sustainable management of human-wildlife interactions. Moreover, demonstrating the feasibility of remote stakeholder involvement, our study presents a robust model for enhancing coexistence, adaptable even where in-person meetings are challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In modern landscapes, the sustainable coexistence of humans and wildlife depends on involving stakeholders in the development and implementation of management strategies. This is particularly important for species like the European bison (Bison bonasus) and Eurasian moose (Alces alces), which are reoccupying regions between Germany and Poland after a prolonged absence. The return of these species generates mixed emotions, as interactions with these species are associated with both costs and benefits to people. Addressing the apparent unpreparedness in managing these trade-offs, we implemented a digital participatory impact assessment in two steps. First, we engaged bison and moose experts to develop management scenarios and assessment criteria. Then, in a subsequent virtual workshop, stakeholders evaluated four scenarios along economic, social, and ecological dimensions. Quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed divergent perspectives and priorities, yet consensus emerged on the necessary future steps: formulating a comprehensive management strategy with guidelines and protocols for managing specific conflict scenarios, such as the incursion of large herbivores onto highways. Our approach underscores the importance of early stakeholder engagement in fostering a more equitable and sustainable management of human-wildlife interactions. Moreover, demonstrating the feasibility of remote stakeholder involvement, our study presents a robust model for enhancing coexistence, adaptable even where in-person meetings are challenging.

利益相关者驱动的大型食草动物恢复管理策略
在现代景观中,人类与野生动物的可持续共存取决于利益相关者参与管理战略的制定和实施。这对欧洲野牛(bison bonasus)和欧亚驼鹿(Alces Alces)等物种尤其重要,它们在长期消失后重新占据了德国和波兰之间的地区。这些物种的回归产生了复杂的情绪,因为与这些物种的互动对人们来说既有成本也有收益。为了解决在管理这些权衡方面明显缺乏准备的问题,我们分两个步骤实施了数字参与式影响评估。首先,我们聘请野牛和驼鹿专家制定管理方案和评估标准。然后,在随后的虚拟研讨会上,利益相关者从经济、社会和生态的角度评估了四种情景。定量和定性分析揭示了不同的观点和优先事项,但就必要的未来步骤达成了共识:制定一项综合管理战略,包括管理特定冲突情景的指导方针和协议,例如大型食草动物入侵高速公路。我们的方法强调了利益相关者早期参与对促进人类与野生动物相互作用的更公平和可持续管理的重要性。此外,为了证明远程利益相关者参与的可行性,我们的研究提出了一个增强共存的稳健模型,即使在面对面会议具有挑战性的情况下也能适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信