The role of occupational therapists in acute mental health inpatient settings: A systematic scoping review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Adele Adelle, Kris Bedford, Sabrina McMahon, Carolyn Dun, Rachael Starbuck, Nastaran Doroud
{"title":"The role of occupational therapists in acute mental health inpatient settings: A systematic scoping review","authors":"Adele Adelle,&nbsp;Kris Bedford,&nbsp;Sabrina McMahon,&nbsp;Carolyn Dun,&nbsp;Rachael Starbuck,&nbsp;Nastaran Doroud","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational therapists play an important role in offering interventions in acute mental health inpatient settings through use of individualised, activity-based, sensory, and group approaches. They may face challenges, however, to implement evidence-based interventions due to high caseload, consumers' short duration of stay, and general limited understanding of the value of occupational therapy interventions. This scoping review aimed to address this gap by answering the following question: ‘What evidence is available for occupational therapy interventions within acute mental health inpatient settings?’</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This review used Arksey and O′Malley's (2005) scoping review framework. The review question was identified by occupational therapists from two leading mental health settings in Melbourne, Victoria. Three electronic databases, citation searches, and hand searching were used to locate studies that were independently screened by authors. Studies within adult acute inpatient mental health units that examined interventions designed or delivered by occupational therapists were selected. These studies were data extracted, and findings were thematically synthesised.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\n \n <p>There was no consumer and community involvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-one studies relevant to the review question were identified. The findings from these studies were synthesised into five themes: (a) consumers' experiences of occupational therapy interventions; (b) enabling activity engagement and choice; (c) restoring function; (d) reduced need for restrictive practices; and (e) sensory modulation. These themes are discussed in relation to environmental and occupational factors, occupational therapy approaches, and contributions to consumers' recovery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings from this review highlighted the pivotal role of occupational therapists in acute inpatient mental health settings in addressing occupational deprivation and functional decline; reducing the need for restrictive practices; enabling self-management strategies to reduce distress; and fostering personal recovery. Understanding of and promoting the unique value of occupational therapy interventions is essential to ensure effective multidisciplinary care within acute mental health settings. Future research is recommended to further explore and investigate effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions, barriers to evidence-based practices, and consumers' experiences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Occupational therapists play an important role in offering interventions in acute mental health inpatient settings through use of individualised, activity-based, sensory, and group approaches. They may face challenges, however, to implement evidence-based interventions due to high caseload, consumers' short duration of stay, and general limited understanding of the value of occupational therapy interventions. This scoping review aimed to address this gap by answering the following question: ‘What evidence is available for occupational therapy interventions within acute mental health inpatient settings?’

Methods

This review used Arksey and O′Malley's (2005) scoping review framework. The review question was identified by occupational therapists from two leading mental health settings in Melbourne, Victoria. Three electronic databases, citation searches, and hand searching were used to locate studies that were independently screened by authors. Studies within adult acute inpatient mental health units that examined interventions designed or delivered by occupational therapists were selected. These studies were data extracted, and findings were thematically synthesised.

Consumer and community involvement

There was no consumer and community involvement.

Findings

Twenty-one studies relevant to the review question were identified. The findings from these studies were synthesised into five themes: (a) consumers' experiences of occupational therapy interventions; (b) enabling activity engagement and choice; (c) restoring function; (d) reduced need for restrictive practices; and (e) sensory modulation. These themes are discussed in relation to environmental and occupational factors, occupational therapy approaches, and contributions to consumers' recovery.

Conclusion

The findings from this review highlighted the pivotal role of occupational therapists in acute inpatient mental health settings in addressing occupational deprivation and functional decline; reducing the need for restrictive practices; enabling self-management strategies to reduce distress; and fostering personal recovery. Understanding of and promoting the unique value of occupational therapy interventions is essential to ensure effective multidisciplinary care within acute mental health settings. Future research is recommended to further explore and investigate effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions, barriers to evidence-based practices, and consumers' experiences.

职业治疗师在急性精神健康住院病人设置中的作用:一个系统的范围审查
职业治疗师通过使用个性化的、基于活动的、感觉的和群体的方法,在急性精神健康住院环境中提供干预措施方面发挥着重要作用。然而,由于病例量大、患者住院时间短以及对职业治疗干预价值的普遍理解有限,他们在实施循证干预方面可能面临挑战。本综述旨在通过回答以下问题来解决这一差距:“在急性精神健康住院患者中,有什么证据可以证明职业治疗干预?”方法本综述采用Arksey和O ' malley(2005)的范围综述框架。来自维多利亚州墨尔本两家主要心理健康机构的职业治疗师确定了审查问题。使用三种电子数据库、引文检索和手工检索来定位由作者独立筛选的研究。选择了在成人急性住院精神卫生单位进行的研究,这些研究检查了由职业治疗师设计或提供的干预措施。这些研究的数据是提取出来的,研究结果是按主题综合的。消费者和社区参与没有消费者和社区参与。21项与回顾问题相关的研究被确定。这些研究的结果被综合为五个主题:(a)消费者对职业治疗干预的体验;(b)促进活动参与和选择;(c)恢复功能;(d)减少限制性做法的需要;(e)感觉调节。这些主题讨论了环境和职业因素,职业治疗方法,以及对消费者恢复的贡献。结论本综述的研究结果强调了急性住院患者心理健康环境中职业治疗师在解决职业剥夺和功能衰退方面的关键作用;减少限制性做法的必要性;使自我管理策略能够减少痛苦;促进个人康复。了解和促进职业治疗干预的独特价值对于确保在急性精神卫生环境中有效的多学科护理至关重要。未来的研究建议进一步探索和调查职业治疗干预措施的有效性、循证实践的障碍以及消费者的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信