How does space matter? On the importance of embedding spatialities in industrial ecology frameworks for circularity in the built environment

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Georg Schiller, Xiaoxue Gao, Maud Lanau, Andreas Blum, Ning Zhang, Mustafa Selçuk Çıdık
{"title":"How does space matter? On the importance of embedding spatialities in industrial ecology frameworks for circularity in the built environment","authors":"Georg Schiller,&nbsp;Xiaoxue Gao,&nbsp;Maud Lanau,&nbsp;Andreas Blum,&nbsp;Ning Zhang,&nbsp;Mustafa Selçuk Çıdık","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores the critical role of spatiality and scale in industrial ecology (IE) research to promote circularity within the built environment. Traditional IE frameworks are predominantly a-spatial and a-political, overlooking the complex socio-ecological–technological dynamics of urban–regional environments. This gap limits the development of holistic assessments and effective strategies for circularity, often externalizing political, economic, and societal implications. In this paper, we emphasize the need to integrate diverse spatial entities, such as social actors, natural resources, and infrastructure, into IE frameworks. Drawing on recent developments within the IE community (including insights from the ISIE 2023 conference) we demonstrate how multiple spatialities and politics are already integral to several areas of IE research and practice, such as circularity accounting and industrial symbiosis. We highlight how spatial concepts—such as urbanization patterns, geographic features, territory, place, and actor-networks—reveal context-specific drivers and barriers to circular transformation. We then leverage the concept of scales established across spatial sciences to introduce a typology of scales relevant to IE, and identify which scale types have yet to be operationalized in IE research. Given the potential analytical yield of each scale type, we advocate for a reflective multi-scalar approach to incorporate multiple spatialities into IE research. Ultimately, we call for a spatial turn in re-conceptualizing IE tools to support the transformation of the built environment toward circularity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 3","pages":"645-655"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the critical role of spatiality and scale in industrial ecology (IE) research to promote circularity within the built environment. Traditional IE frameworks are predominantly a-spatial and a-political, overlooking the complex socio-ecological–technological dynamics of urban–regional environments. This gap limits the development of holistic assessments and effective strategies for circularity, often externalizing political, economic, and societal implications. In this paper, we emphasize the need to integrate diverse spatial entities, such as social actors, natural resources, and infrastructure, into IE frameworks. Drawing on recent developments within the IE community (including insights from the ISIE 2023 conference) we demonstrate how multiple spatialities and politics are already integral to several areas of IE research and practice, such as circularity accounting and industrial symbiosis. We highlight how spatial concepts—such as urbanization patterns, geographic features, territory, place, and actor-networks—reveal context-specific drivers and barriers to circular transformation. We then leverage the concept of scales established across spatial sciences to introduce a typology of scales relevant to IE, and identify which scale types have yet to be operationalized in IE research. Given the potential analytical yield of each scale type, we advocate for a reflective multi-scalar approach to incorporate multiple spatialities into IE research. Ultimately, we call for a spatial turn in re-conceptualizing IE tools to support the transformation of the built environment toward circularity.

Abstract Image

空间是如何起作用的?论在工业生态框架中嵌入空间性对建筑环境循环的重要性
本文探讨了空间性和规模在工业生态学(IE)研究中促进建筑环境循环的关键作用。传统的工业工程框架主要是空间和政治的,忽视了城市-区域环境复杂的社会-生态-技术动态。这一差距限制了全面评估和有效循环战略的发展,往往使政治、经济和社会影响外部化。在本文中,我们强调需要将不同的空间实体,如社会行动者、自然资源和基础设施,整合到IE框架中。根据工业工程社区最近的发展(包括来自ISIE 2023会议的见解),我们展示了多重空间性和政治如何已经成为工业工程研究和实践的几个领域的组成部分,例如循环核算和工业共生。我们强调空间概念——如城市化模式、地理特征、领土、地点和行动者网络——如何揭示特定环境下循环转型的驱动因素和障碍。然后,我们利用在空间科学中建立的尺度概念来介绍与工业工程相关的尺度类型,并确定哪些尺度类型尚未在工业工程研究中应用。考虑到每种尺度类型的潜在分析产出,我们提倡一种反思性的多标量方法,将多种空间性纳入IE研究。最终,我们呼吁在空间上转向重新概念化IE工具,以支持建筑环境向圆形的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信