Who Bears the Brunt of Disruptive Innovation? The Effect of Grocery E-Commerce on Local Retail Competitors

IF 3.2 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Brian Y. An, Jamie Chung
{"title":"Who Bears the Brunt of Disruptive Innovation? The Effect of Grocery E-Commerce on Local Retail Competitors","authors":"Brian Y. An,&nbsp;Jamie Chung","doi":"10.1111/jors.12765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rising prominence of e-commerce has raised concerns regarding its potential threat to local businesses. However, existing literature lacks substantial empirical evidence of the impact of e-retailers due to its ambiguous service areas. Our study aims to address this gap by focusing on e-grocery giants Amazon Fresh and Instacart to examine their influences on local brick-and-mortar businesses within the grocery retail industry. We leverage e-grocery's clearly defined service areas at the zip code level to employ a difference-in-difference approach with longitudinal establishment-level records from the National Establishment Times Series (NETS) database in the greater Atlanta metropolitan area. We find that retail competitors experience an annual decline in sales following Amazon Fresh's entry into the local market. In response, these retailers partially adjust operations, reducing their headcount. Notably, the negative impacts disproportionately affect small businesses, and the effects are spatially widespread, irrespective of proximity to major retail clusters anchored by big-box stores. Over time, the presence and continuous operations of Amazon Fresh that offers both sales and delivery of goods exert a heavier burden on local retail stores. In contrast, we do not find such evidence of disruptive effects for Instacart, which is increasingly becoming a dominant grocery e-commerce model in partnership with local store chains over independent operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regional Science","volume":"65 3","pages":"843-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jors.12765","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jors.12765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising prominence of e-commerce has raised concerns regarding its potential threat to local businesses. However, existing literature lacks substantial empirical evidence of the impact of e-retailers due to its ambiguous service areas. Our study aims to address this gap by focusing on e-grocery giants Amazon Fresh and Instacart to examine their influences on local brick-and-mortar businesses within the grocery retail industry. We leverage e-grocery's clearly defined service areas at the zip code level to employ a difference-in-difference approach with longitudinal establishment-level records from the National Establishment Times Series (NETS) database in the greater Atlanta metropolitan area. We find that retail competitors experience an annual decline in sales following Amazon Fresh's entry into the local market. In response, these retailers partially adjust operations, reducing their headcount. Notably, the negative impacts disproportionately affect small businesses, and the effects are spatially widespread, irrespective of proximity to major retail clusters anchored by big-box stores. Over time, the presence and continuous operations of Amazon Fresh that offers both sales and delivery of goods exert a heavier burden on local retail stores. In contrast, we do not find such evidence of disruptive effects for Instacart, which is increasingly becoming a dominant grocery e-commerce model in partnership with local store chains over independent operations.

Abstract Image

谁将承受破坏性创新的冲击?杂货电子商务对本地零售竞争者的影响
电子商务的崛起引起了人们对其对当地企业的潜在威胁的担忧。然而,由于电子零售商的服务领域模糊,现有文献缺乏实质性的实证证据。我们的研究旨在通过关注电子杂货巨头亚马逊生鲜和Instacart来解决这一差距,研究它们对当地实体店的影响。我们利用电子杂货在邮政编码级别上明确定义的服务区域,采用差异中的差异方法,使用来自大亚特兰大大都会地区的国家建立时间序列(NETS)数据库的纵向建立级别记录。我们发现,在亚马逊生鲜进入当地市场后,零售竞争对手的销售额每年都在下降。作为回应,这些零售商部分调整了业务,减少了员工人数。值得注意的是,这种负面影响对小企业的影响尤为严重,而且这种影响在空间上是广泛存在的,与大型商店所支撑的主要零售集群的邻近程度无关。随着时间的推移,同时提供销售和配送服务的“亚马逊生鲜”的存在和持续运营给当地零售商店带来了更大的负担。相比之下,我们没有发现这样的证据对Instacart产生破坏性影响,Instacart正日益成为与当地连锁店合作而不是独立运营的主导杂货电子商务模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Regional Science (JRS) publishes original analytical research at the intersection of economics and quantitative geography. Since 1958, the JRS has published leading contributions to urban and regional thought including rigorous methodological contributions and seminal theoretical pieces. The JRS is one of the most highly cited journals in urban and regional research, planning, geography, and the environment. The JRS publishes work that advances our understanding of the geographic dimensions of urban and regional economies, human settlements, and policies related to cities and regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信