Pasture cropping and keyline plow as strategies to mitigate compaction in clay soils in Vermont

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Berdakh Utemuratov, Juan P. Alvez, Paliza Shrestha, Joshua W. Faulkner
{"title":"Pasture cropping and keyline plow as strategies to mitigate compaction in clay soils in Vermont","authors":"Berdakh Utemuratov,&nbsp;Juan P. Alvez,&nbsp;Paliza Shrestha,&nbsp;Joshua W. Faulkner","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field plot experiments were conducted over 3 years at two farm sites in Vermont to evaluate the effects of mechanical subsoiling and three pasture cropping mixes on soil compaction across rotationally grazed pasturelands with contrasting management histories in Vermont. Penetration resistance was measured across the 0–45.7 cm profile using both profile-level and depth-stratified analyses. Among the biological treatments, the sudangrass-based mix achieved the greatest compaction alleviation, particularly at the site with higher initial severity. At the northern site (Health Hero [HH] Farm), this mix produced significantly lower median penetration resistance (1.59 MPa) and a narrower interquartile range (0.93 MPa) than other treatments, indicating more uniform soil improvement. At the southern site (Philo Ridge [PR] Farm), keyline plowing resulted in the lowest median resistance (1.41 MPa) but showed greater variability across replicates. Depth-wise trends revealed that biological mixes, particularly the sudangrass-based mix, provided consistent alleviation across soil layers. These findings highlight the value of biologically tailored strategies not only for reducing compaction but also for achieving spatially uniform soil structure recovery. Tailoring species composition to compaction depth offers a practical and lower disturbance alternative to mechanical tillage for improving pasture systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Field plot experiments were conducted over 3 years at two farm sites in Vermont to evaluate the effects of mechanical subsoiling and three pasture cropping mixes on soil compaction across rotationally grazed pasturelands with contrasting management histories in Vermont. Penetration resistance was measured across the 0–45.7 cm profile using both profile-level and depth-stratified analyses. Among the biological treatments, the sudangrass-based mix achieved the greatest compaction alleviation, particularly at the site with higher initial severity. At the northern site (Health Hero [HH] Farm), this mix produced significantly lower median penetration resistance (1.59 MPa) and a narrower interquartile range (0.93 MPa) than other treatments, indicating more uniform soil improvement. At the southern site (Philo Ridge [PR] Farm), keyline plowing resulted in the lowest median resistance (1.41 MPa) but showed greater variability across replicates. Depth-wise trends revealed that biological mixes, particularly the sudangrass-based mix, provided consistent alleviation across soil layers. These findings highlight the value of biologically tailored strategies not only for reducing compaction but also for achieving spatially uniform soil structure recovery. Tailoring species composition to compaction depth offers a practical and lower disturbance alternative to mechanical tillage for improving pasture systems.

Abstract Image

在佛蒙特州,牧场种植和keyline犁作为缓解粘土压实的策略
在佛蒙特州的两个农场进行了为期3年的田间小区试验,以评估机械深埋和三种牧草混合种植对佛蒙特州不同管理历史的轮牧牧场土壤压实的影响。通过剖面水平和深度分层分析,测量了0-45.7 cm剖面的穿透阻力。在生物处理中,苏丹草混合处理的压实缓解效果最大,特别是在初始严重程度较高的场地。在北部场地(Health Hero [HH] Farm),与其他处理相比,该混合处理的中位数渗透阻力(1.59 MPa)显著降低,四分位数间距(0.93 MPa)更窄,表明土壤改良更均匀。在南部站点(Philo Ridge [PR] Farm),关键线耕作的中位抗性最低(1.41 MPa),但在重复中表现出较大的变异性。深度趋势表明,生物混合,特别是苏丹草混合,在土层之间提供了一致的缓解。这些发现强调了生物定制策略的价值,不仅可以减少压实,而且可以实现空间均匀的土壤结构恢复。根据压实深度调整物种组成为改善草场系统提供了一种实用的、低干扰的替代机械耕作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信