Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70305
Chloe Beaupre, Alissa Bevan, Jessica R. Young, Kevin A. Blecha
{"title":"Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization","authors":"Chloe Beaupre,&nbsp;Alissa Bevan,&nbsp;Jessica R. Young,&nbsp;Kevin A. Blecha","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With continual growth in recreational trail use, it is becoming increasingly complicated to balance demands for outdoor recreation opportunities with wildlife conservation. To better understand how mule deer (<i>Odocoileus hemionus</i>) and Rocky Mountain elk (<i>Cervus canadensis</i>) respond to trail-based recreation, we deployed remote cameras in a paired study design to assess ungulate encounter rates relative to recreation traffic counts and distance from trails. Our methodology allowed us to estimate the magnitude of human activity on public land trails, which can be challenging, but is a key step in understanding recreational effects on animal utilization, especially if any interaction in trail proximity and human traffic rates exists. Paired cameras provided a comparison of animal encounter rates on- and off-trail at varying trail proximities, and the on-trail camera also yielded daily recreation traffic counts to assess how animals respond to varying traffic for each camera pair. Elk avoided busier trails and showed a strong positive response to distance from trails, while mule deer exhibited a positive response to higher traffic counts and no measurable effect of trail proximity. We identified a distance to trail threshold of 600–655 m, where elk utilization shifted from lower-than-expected utilization to higher-than-expected utilization, indicating that this elk population was redistributed to some degree within 57.5% of the study area's extent. Quantifying recreation traffic counts was key to understanding species' responses to recreation, highlighting the need for managers to consider both trail placement and human traffic regulation to mitigate recreation impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70305","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With continual growth in recreational trail use, it is becoming increasingly complicated to balance demands for outdoor recreation opportunities with wildlife conservation. To better understand how mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) respond to trail-based recreation, we deployed remote cameras in a paired study design to assess ungulate encounter rates relative to recreation traffic counts and distance from trails. Our methodology allowed us to estimate the magnitude of human activity on public land trails, which can be challenging, but is a key step in understanding recreational effects on animal utilization, especially if any interaction in trail proximity and human traffic rates exists. Paired cameras provided a comparison of animal encounter rates on- and off-trail at varying trail proximities, and the on-trail camera also yielded daily recreation traffic counts to assess how animals respond to varying traffic for each camera pair. Elk avoided busier trails and showed a strong positive response to distance from trails, while mule deer exhibited a positive response to higher traffic counts and no measurable effect of trail proximity. We identified a distance to trail threshold of 600–655 m, where elk utilization shifted from lower-than-expected utilization to higher-than-expected utilization, indicating that this elk population was redistributed to some degree within 57.5% of the study area's extent. Quantifying recreation traffic counts was key to understanding species' responses to recreation, highlighting the need for managers to consider both trail placement and human traffic regulation to mitigate recreation impacts.

Abstract Image

休闲步道交通计数和步道邻近是有蹄类景观利用的驱动因素
随着休闲步道使用的不断增加,平衡户外休闲活动与野生动物保护的需求变得越来越复杂。为了更好地了解骡鹿(Odocoileus hemionus)和落基山麋鹿(Cervus canadensis)对小径休闲活动的反应,我们在配对研究设计中部署了远程摄像机,以评估与休闲交通数量和距离小径相关的有蹄类动物偶遇率。我们的方法使我们能够估计公共土地步道上人类活动的规模,这可能具有挑战性,但这是理解娱乐对动物利用的影响的关键一步,特别是如果步道邻近和人类交通率存在任何相互作用。成对的摄像机提供了在不同的步道附近,动物在步道上和步道外遇到率的比较,步道上的摄像机也产生了每天的娱乐流量计数,以评估动物对每对摄像机的不同交通流量的反应。驼鹿避开繁忙的步道,对与步道的距离表现出强烈的正响应,而骡鹿对较高的交通量表现出积极的响应,步道的距离没有可测量的影响。在600 ~ 655 m区间内,麋鹿的利用由低于预期的利用率向高于预期的利用率转变,表明在57.5%的研究区范围内,麋鹿种群发生了一定程度的再分布。量化游憩交通数量是了解物种对游憩的反应的关键,强调了管理者需要考虑步道布置和人类交通管制,以减轻游憩的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信