The Validation of the Nomophobia Questionnaire Using a Modern Psychometric Approach: An Item Response Theory Analysis of 5087 Participants

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Haitham Jahrami, Khaled Trabelsi, Achraf Ammar, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Hadeel Ghazzawi, Waqar Husain, Maha M. AlRasheed, Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal, Amir Pakpour, Zahra Saif, Michael V. Vitiello
{"title":"The Validation of the Nomophobia Questionnaire Using a Modern Psychometric Approach: An Item Response Theory Analysis of 5087 Participants","authors":"Haitham Jahrami,&nbsp;Khaled Trabelsi,&nbsp;Achraf Ammar,&nbsp;Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,&nbsp;Hadeel Ghazzawi,&nbsp;Waqar Husain,&nbsp;Maha M. AlRasheed,&nbsp;Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal,&nbsp;Amir Pakpour,&nbsp;Zahra Saif,&nbsp;Michael V. Vitiello","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nomophobia, or the anxiety of being separated from one's mobile phone, is an emerging psychological condition in our digital age. The 20-item Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q) was developed to assess nomophobia symptoms. This study utilized item response theory (IRT) and classical test theory (CTT) methods to evaluate the NMP-Q's psychometric properties. Data were collected from 5087 adults who completed the NMP-Q. The CTT analyses included the computation of correlation coefficients, including McDonald's <i>ω</i>, Cronbach's <i>α</i>, Guttman's <i>λ</i>2, Guttman's <i>λ</i>6, greatest lower bound, average interitem correlation, Feldt–Gilmer coefficient, Feldt–Brennan coefficient, and Raju's <i>β</i>. IRT analyses included graded response modeling of items, test information function, differential item functioning, and reliability. CTT analysis revealed high reliability coefficients across nine metrics and a four-factor model with good fit indices. IRT analysis showed a strong item fit to the polytomous graded model, indicating the questionnaire's robustness. Based on IRT (both uni- and multidimensional IRT) analyses, we propose a 10-item short version (NMP-Q Short), demonstrating high correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.97) with the original NMP-Q. Our findings provide very good support for the NMP-Q's reliability and construct validity. The items displayed good discrimination and difficulty parameters. The second 10 items of the NMP-Q appeared to be the most informative. The proposed NMP-Q Short offers a valuable option for efficient/rapid and accurate screening. However, additional validation and sensitivity testing are warranted to further establish its usefulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70622","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nomophobia, or the anxiety of being separated from one's mobile phone, is an emerging psychological condition in our digital age. The 20-item Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q) was developed to assess nomophobia symptoms. This study utilized item response theory (IRT) and classical test theory (CTT) methods to evaluate the NMP-Q's psychometric properties. Data were collected from 5087 adults who completed the NMP-Q. The CTT analyses included the computation of correlation coefficients, including McDonald's ω, Cronbach's α, Guttman's λ2, Guttman's λ6, greatest lower bound, average interitem correlation, Feldt–Gilmer coefficient, Feldt–Brennan coefficient, and Raju's β. IRT analyses included graded response modeling of items, test information function, differential item functioning, and reliability. CTT analysis revealed high reliability coefficients across nine metrics and a four-factor model with good fit indices. IRT analysis showed a strong item fit to the polytomous graded model, indicating the questionnaire's robustness. Based on IRT (both uni- and multidimensional IRT) analyses, we propose a 10-item short version (NMP-Q Short), demonstrating high correlation (r = 0.97) with the original NMP-Q. Our findings provide very good support for the NMP-Q's reliability and construct validity. The items displayed good discrimination and difficulty parameters. The second 10 items of the NMP-Q appeared to be the most informative. The proposed NMP-Q Short offers a valuable option for efficient/rapid and accurate screening. However, additional validation and sensitivity testing are warranted to further establish its usefulness.

现代心理测量方法对无恐惧症问卷的验证:5087名被试的项目反应理论分析
“无手机恐惧症”(Nomophobia),即对远离手机的焦虑,是我们这个数字时代新出现的一种心理状况。制定了20项无恐惧症问卷(NMP-Q)来评估无恐惧症症状。本研究运用项目反应理论(IRT)和经典测试理论(CTT)方法对NMP-Q的心理测量特性进行了评价。数据收集自5087名完成NMP-Q的成年人。CTT分析包括相关系数的计算,包括McDonald's ω、Cronbach's α、Guttman's λ2、Guttman's λ6、最大下界、平均项目间相关系数、Feldt-Gilmer系数、Feldt-Brennan系数和Raju's β。IRT分析包括项目的分级反应模型、测试信息功能、差异项目功能和可靠性。CTT分析显示,9个指标的可靠性系数高,四因素模型具有良好的拟合指标。IRT分析显示,问卷的项目与多元分级模型有很强的拟合性,表明问卷的稳健性。基于IRT(单IRT和多维IRT)分析,我们提出了一个10项短版本(NMP-Q short),与原始NMP-Q具有高相关性(r = 0.97)。我们的研究结果为NMP-Q的信度和结构效度提供了很好的支持。项目具有良好的辨别性和难度参数。NMP-Q的后10个项目似乎是最翔实的。拟议的NMP-Q Short为高效/快速和准确的筛选提供了一个有价值的选择。然而,额外的验证和灵敏度测试是必要的,以进一步确定其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信