Concetta Irace, Angelo Avogaro, Federico Bertuzzi, Raffaella Buzzetti, Riccardo Candido, Stefano Del Prato, Paolo Di Bartolo, Paolo Fiorina, Carlo Bruno Giorda, Francesco Giorgino
{"title":"Enhancing Type 2 Diabetes Care With CGM Integration: Insights From an Italian Expert Group","authors":"Concetta Irace, Angelo Avogaro, Federico Bertuzzi, Raffaella Buzzetti, Riccardo Candido, Stefano Del Prato, Paolo Di Bartolo, Paolo Fiorina, Carlo Bruno Giorda, Francesco Giorgino","doi":"10.1002/dmrr.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a pandemic and strongly impact patients' prognosis. Several barriers may hamper the achievement of good glycaemic control, which is the aim of diabetes care. These include but are not limited to poor treatment adherence, poor self-management, and heterogeneity of the disease context. Diabetes self-management is critical, particularly in insulin-treated patients and it is largely based on glucose monitoring, which allows recording glucose levels to make informed decisions with respect to meals, exercise, and other daily-life activities. For decades, glucose monitoring has been based on self-measurement of capillary blood glucose, which has some obvious important limitations. With the start of the new century, systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have become available. These systems measure subcutaneous interstitial glucose levels in a continuous or intermittent manner. They allow a better description of daily glucose pattern and glycaemic trend, a more accurate identification of glucose peaks and identification of otherwise unrecognised hypoglycaemic episodes, and a more reliable assessment of the stability of glycaemic control. CGM has been repeatedly shown to improve glycaemic control and reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Over the years however, evidence has been gathered on the CGM use in T2D on different treatment regimens and wider applications are clearly desired. The aim of this expert opinion paper is to summarise the currently available evidence on CGM use across the whole spectrum of T2D and suggest practical indications beyond current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11335,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dmrr.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.70059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a pandemic and strongly impact patients' prognosis. Several barriers may hamper the achievement of good glycaemic control, which is the aim of diabetes care. These include but are not limited to poor treatment adherence, poor self-management, and heterogeneity of the disease context. Diabetes self-management is critical, particularly in insulin-treated patients and it is largely based on glucose monitoring, which allows recording glucose levels to make informed decisions with respect to meals, exercise, and other daily-life activities. For decades, glucose monitoring has been based on self-measurement of capillary blood glucose, which has some obvious important limitations. With the start of the new century, systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have become available. These systems measure subcutaneous interstitial glucose levels in a continuous or intermittent manner. They allow a better description of daily glucose pattern and glycaemic trend, a more accurate identification of glucose peaks and identification of otherwise unrecognised hypoglycaemic episodes, and a more reliable assessment of the stability of glycaemic control. CGM has been repeatedly shown to improve glycaemic control and reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Over the years however, evidence has been gathered on the CGM use in T2D on different treatment regimens and wider applications are clearly desired. The aim of this expert opinion paper is to summarise the currently available evidence on CGM use across the whole spectrum of T2D and suggest practical indications beyond current guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews is a premier endocrinology and metabolism journal esteemed by clinicians and researchers alike. Encompassing a wide spectrum of topics including diabetes, endocrinology, metabolism, and obesity, the journal eagerly accepts submissions ranging from clinical studies to basic and translational research, as well as reviews exploring historical progress, controversial issues, and prominent opinions in the field. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in the realm of diabetes and metabolism.