Effect of Three Different Roller Milling Techniques on the Milling Properties and Baking Quality of Wheat Flour With Varying Protein Content

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Snehasis Chakraborty, Hemanth Bommina, Manoj Kumar Pulivarthi, Kaliramesh Siliveru
{"title":"Effect of Three Different Roller Milling Techniques on the Milling Properties and Baking Quality of Wheat Flour With Varying Protein Content","authors":"Snehasis Chakraborty,&nbsp;Hemanth Bommina,&nbsp;Manoj Kumar Pulivarthi,&nbsp;Kaliramesh Siliveru","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The study evaluated the impact of three different roller mills (Bühler Lab, Chopin Lab, and Brabender Sr. mills) on the milling yield, particle size, proximate composition, color profile, density, rheological properties, and bread quality of wheat flour with varying protein content. Milling trials were conducted on wheat samples (hard red spring [HRS] and hard red winter [HRW]) with varying protein levels (low: 9.7% [100% HRW], mid: 12% [HRS + HRW in 1:1 ratio], and high: 14.5% [100% HRS]). The Brabender Sr. mill achieved the highest straight-grade flour recovery of 73.3% for low-protein wheat. The particle size distribution analysis revealed differences among mills, with flour from the Bühler Lab mill having finer particles than those from the Chopin Lab and Brabender Sr. mills. Proximate composition analysis indicated that moisture content ranged between 13.3% and 15.6%, protein content between 9.8% and 12.3%, and damaged starch between 4.7% and 8.2%, depending on the mill and wheat protein level. Density parameters were minimally influenced by wheat protein content but varied between mills. The high-protein flours exhibited better water absorption and dough stability, with the Brabender Sr. mill yielding the highest water absorption capacity. The interaction between milling type and protein content significantly influenced (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) milling yield, water absorption, and bread quality attributes. Bread with higher protein content correlated with larger and uniform cell structures. The Bühler mill performs best for low-protein bread volume. The Brabender Sr. mill offers higher milling yield, while the Chopin Lab mill delivers greater bread volume for high- and medium-protein.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"48 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluated the impact of three different roller mills (Bühler Lab, Chopin Lab, and Brabender Sr. mills) on the milling yield, particle size, proximate composition, color profile, density, rheological properties, and bread quality of wheat flour with varying protein content. Milling trials were conducted on wheat samples (hard red spring [HRS] and hard red winter [HRW]) with varying protein levels (low: 9.7% [100% HRW], mid: 12% [HRS + HRW in 1:1 ratio], and high: 14.5% [100% HRS]). The Brabender Sr. mill achieved the highest straight-grade flour recovery of 73.3% for low-protein wheat. The particle size distribution analysis revealed differences among mills, with flour from the Bühler Lab mill having finer particles than those from the Chopin Lab and Brabender Sr. mills. Proximate composition analysis indicated that moisture content ranged between 13.3% and 15.6%, protein content between 9.8% and 12.3%, and damaged starch between 4.7% and 8.2%, depending on the mill and wheat protein level. Density parameters were minimally influenced by wheat protein content but varied between mills. The high-protein flours exhibited better water absorption and dough stability, with the Brabender Sr. mill yielding the highest water absorption capacity. The interaction between milling type and protein content significantly influenced (p < 0.05) milling yield, water absorption, and bread quality attributes. Bread with higher protein content correlated with larger and uniform cell structures. The Bühler mill performs best for low-protein bread volume. The Brabender Sr. mill offers higher milling yield, while the Chopin Lab mill delivers greater bread volume for high- and medium-protein.

三种不同碾磨工艺对不同蛋白质含量小麦粉碾磨性能和烘焙品质的影响
该研究评估了三种不同的辊磨机(b hler实验室、肖邦实验室和Brabender Sr. mills)对不同蛋白质含量的小麦粉的磨粉率、粒度、近似成分、颜色轮廓、密度、流变特性和面包质量的影响。采用不同蛋白质水平(低9.7% [100% HRW],中12% [HRW + HRW 1:1],高14.5% [100% HRS])的小麦样品(硬红春季[HRS]和硬红冬季[HRW])进行碾磨试验。Brabender sr轧机对低蛋白小麦的直级面粉回收率最高,为73.3%。粒度分布分析揭示了不同工厂之间的差异,从赫勒实验室工厂生产的面粉比从肖邦实验室和老布拉本德工厂生产的面粉颗粒更细。水分含量在13.3% ~ 15.6%之间,蛋白质含量在9.8% ~ 12.3%之间,受损淀粉含量在4.7% ~ 8.2%之间,这取决于粉碎机和小麦的蛋白质水平。密度参数受小麦蛋白质含量的影响最小,但在不同的粉碎机之间存在差异。高蛋白粉具有较好的吸水性和面团稳定性,其中Brabender sr磨的吸水性最高。碾磨方式与蛋白质含量的交互作用显著影响(p < 0.05)碾磨产量、吸水率和面包品质属性。蛋白质含量高的面包,其细胞结构更大、更均匀。赫勒粉碎机对低蛋白面包的生产效果最好。Brabender Sr.磨粉机提供更高的磨粉产量,而Chopin Lab磨粉机提供更高的高蛋白和中蛋白面包产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信