Effect of Pest Control Strategies on Arthropod Pests of Apple in Europe: A Meta-Analysis

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Ingrid Aline Bapfubusa Niyibizi, Pia Addison, Klaus Birkhofer
{"title":"Effect of Pest Control Strategies on Arthropod Pests of Apple in Europe: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Ingrid Aline Bapfubusa Niyibizi,&nbsp;Pia Addison,&nbsp;Klaus Birkhofer","doi":"10.1111/jen.13416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Apple (<i>Malus domestica</i> Borkh.) is a major fruit crop in Europe. More than 200 phytophagous arthropod species thrive in European apple orchards, several of which are economically important pests. Due to the pest pressure on apple production, consumer demand for residue-free products and current policies to make food production in the European Union more sustainable, pest management has become an important issue in meeting the high cosmetic standards expected for apples on the fresh fruit market. The aim of this study was to determine the most effective management strategy to reduce the abundance of arthropod pests of apples in Europe. We conducted a Europe-wide meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of integrated pest management (IPM) and organic management in reducing the abundance of arthropod pests. We also examined the differences between synthetic and organic pesticides in terms of pest reduction as a core element of the difference between IPM and organic apple production systems in Europe. We found an overall nonsignificant effect of IPM compared to organic management. However, when comparing synthetic pesticides with organic pesticides, we found that synthetic pesticides were significantly more effective. On the other hand, organic pesticides showed a significant positive effect in controlling pest populations when compared to an absence of treatment. This analysis highlights the effectiveness of synthetic pesticides over organic pesticides, while accounting for the inherent heterogeneity within each group, and suggests that factors beyond insecticide use play an important role in pest reduction in organic and IPM apple production systems in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":14987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Entomology","volume":"149 6","pages":"957-987"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jen.13416","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jen.13416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) is a major fruit crop in Europe. More than 200 phytophagous arthropod species thrive in European apple orchards, several of which are economically important pests. Due to the pest pressure on apple production, consumer demand for residue-free products and current policies to make food production in the European Union more sustainable, pest management has become an important issue in meeting the high cosmetic standards expected for apples on the fresh fruit market. The aim of this study was to determine the most effective management strategy to reduce the abundance of arthropod pests of apples in Europe. We conducted a Europe-wide meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of integrated pest management (IPM) and organic management in reducing the abundance of arthropod pests. We also examined the differences between synthetic and organic pesticides in terms of pest reduction as a core element of the difference between IPM and organic apple production systems in Europe. We found an overall nonsignificant effect of IPM compared to organic management. However, when comparing synthetic pesticides with organic pesticides, we found that synthetic pesticides were significantly more effective. On the other hand, organic pesticides showed a significant positive effect in controlling pest populations when compared to an absence of treatment. This analysis highlights the effectiveness of synthetic pesticides over organic pesticides, while accounting for the inherent heterogeneity within each group, and suggests that factors beyond insecticide use play an important role in pest reduction in organic and IPM apple production systems in Europe.

Abstract Image

欧洲苹果节肢动物害虫防治策略的meta分析
苹果(Malus domestica Borkh.)是欧洲主要水果作物。超过200种植食性节肢动物在欧洲的苹果园中茁壮成长,其中一些是重要的经济害虫。由于害虫对苹果生产的压力,消费者对无残留物产品的需求,以及欧盟现行政策使食品生产更具可持续性,害虫管理已成为满足新鲜水果市场对苹果的高化妆品标准的重要问题。本研究的目的是确定减少欧洲苹果节肢动物害虫丰度的最有效管理策略。我们进行了一项全欧洲范围的荟萃分析,以评估综合有害生物管理(IPM)和有机管理在减少节肢动物有害生物丰度方面的有效性。我们还研究了合成农药和有机农药在减少害虫方面的差异,这是欧洲IPM和有机苹果生产系统差异的核心要素。我们发现,与有机管理相比,IPM的总体效果不显著。然而,当将合成农药与有机农药进行比较时,我们发现合成农药的效果明显更好。另一方面,与不施用有机农药相比,有机农药在控制害虫种群方面表现出显著的积极作用。这一分析强调了合成农药比有机农药的有效性,同时考虑到每一组中固有的异质性,并表明杀虫剂使用以外的因素在欧洲有机和IPM苹果生产系统中减少害虫方面发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Entomology publishes original articles on current research in applied entomology, including mites and spiders in terrestrial ecosystems. Submit your next manuscript for rapid publication: the average time is currently 6 months from submission to publication. With Journal of Applied Entomology''s dynamic article-by-article publication process, Early View, fully peer-reviewed and type-set articles are published online as soon as they complete, without waiting for full issue compilation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信