Training and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Apheresis in Canada: A National Survey

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Soumitra Tole, Amrit Kirpalani
{"title":"Training and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Apheresis in Canada: A National Survey","authors":"Soumitra Tole,&nbsp;Amrit Kirpalani","doi":"10.1002/jca.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study explored the pediatric apheresis landscape in Canada by assessing provider comfort, training adequacy, and prescriber roles for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and automated red blood cell exchange (RBCX). A national survey was completed by 52 pediatric subspecialists (27 nephrologists, 25 hematologists/oncologists) from 12 institutions. Most respondents (63%) reported that both TPE and RBCX were available at their site. Prescribing responsibilities varied by therapy and indication. Across seven clinical domains, comfort scores were moderate for both therapies, with training adequacy scores consistently lower. Training adequacy for TPE was significantly higher than that for RBCX in two domains: identifying (2.48 ± 1.03 vs. 2.10 ± 1.13, <i>p</i> = 0.043) and managing (2.44 ± 1.05 vs. 2.06 ± 1.14, <i>p</i> = 0.035) common complications. Free-text responses emphasized informal training and the need for national education strategies. These findings highlight gaps in pediatric apheresis education and the need for standardized, competency-based training across subspecialties.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the pediatric apheresis landscape in Canada by assessing provider comfort, training adequacy, and prescriber roles for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and automated red blood cell exchange (RBCX). A national survey was completed by 52 pediatric subspecialists (27 nephrologists, 25 hematologists/oncologists) from 12 institutions. Most respondents (63%) reported that both TPE and RBCX were available at their site. Prescribing responsibilities varied by therapy and indication. Across seven clinical domains, comfort scores were moderate for both therapies, with training adequacy scores consistently lower. Training adequacy for TPE was significantly higher than that for RBCX in two domains: identifying (2.48 ± 1.03 vs. 2.10 ± 1.13, p = 0.043) and managing (2.44 ± 1.05 vs. 2.06 ± 1.14, p = 0.035) common complications. Free-text responses emphasized informal training and the need for national education strategies. These findings highlight gaps in pediatric apheresis education and the need for standardized, competency-based training across subspecialties.

加拿大儿科采血术的培训和实践差距:一项全国性调查
本研究通过评估提供者的舒适度、培训的充分性和处方者在治疗性血浆交换(TPE)和自动红细胞交换(RBCX)中的作用,探讨了加拿大儿科采血的现状。来自12家机构的52名儿科专科医生(27名肾病学家,25名血液学家/肿瘤学家)完成了一项全国性调查。大多数受访者(63%)报告说,在他们的网站上可以使用TPE和RBCX。处方责任因治疗和适应症而异。在七个临床领域中,两种疗法的舒适评分都是中等的,训练充分性评分一直较低。TPE在识别常见并发症(2.48±1.03 vs 2.10±1.13,p = 0.043)和管理常见并发症(2.44±1.05 vs 2.06±1.14,p = 0.035)两个方面的培训充分性显著高于RBCX。自由文本答复强调非正式培训和国家教育战略的必要性。这些发现突出了儿科采血教育的差距,以及跨亚专科进行标准化、基于能力的培训的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信