Partner support and interactions with communities show mixed effects on governance of community-based resources

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Eleanor Roxburgh, Morena Mills, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Alifereti Tawake, Margaret Vakalalabure, Hugh Govan, Arundhati Jagadish, Tanya O'Garra
{"title":"Partner support and interactions with communities show mixed effects on governance of community-based resources","authors":"Eleanor Roxburgh,&nbsp;Morena Mills,&nbsp;Sangeeta Mangubhai,&nbsp;Alifereti Tawake,&nbsp;Margaret Vakalalabure,&nbsp;Hugh Govan,&nbsp;Arundhati Jagadish,&nbsp;Tanya O'Garra","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Community-based natural resource management is recognized as an effective area-based conservation approach. Accordingly, conservation organizations worldwide are providing support to local communities seeking to sustainably manage and use their local natural resources. However, there is little understanding of how different types of support provided by partner organizations influence local community governance of these resources. Our data, collected from Fiji using key informant interviews, demonstrates that there is no clear association between partner support and effective community governance of marine resources. While no associations were evident when investigating the effects of partner support on participation and perceived fairness of decision-making at the village level, some significance was identified when investigating responses by social group. We did find a clearer signal, however, with regards to the types of interaction between partners and communities, such that regional meetings were associated with increased community knowledge of the boundaries of the customary fishing grounds and village meetings were associated with increased ecosystem monitoring. Our work underscores the need to evaluate how different types of support from partner organizations, and the manner in which they interact with communities, impact community-based conservation initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community-based natural resource management is recognized as an effective area-based conservation approach. Accordingly, conservation organizations worldwide are providing support to local communities seeking to sustainably manage and use their local natural resources. However, there is little understanding of how different types of support provided by partner organizations influence local community governance of these resources. Our data, collected from Fiji using key informant interviews, demonstrates that there is no clear association between partner support and effective community governance of marine resources. While no associations were evident when investigating the effects of partner support on participation and perceived fairness of decision-making at the village level, some significance was identified when investigating responses by social group. We did find a clearer signal, however, with regards to the types of interaction between partners and communities, such that regional meetings were associated with increased community knowledge of the boundaries of the customary fishing grounds and village meetings were associated with increased ecosystem monitoring. Our work underscores the need to evaluate how different types of support from partner organizations, and the manner in which they interact with communities, impact community-based conservation initiatives.

Abstract Image

合作伙伴的支持和与社区的互动对社区资源的治理产生了复杂的影响
以社区为基础的自然资源管理被认为是一种有效的以地区为基础的保护办法。因此,世界各地的保护组织正在为寻求可持续地管理和利用当地自然资源的当地社区提供支持。然而,对于伙伴组织提供的不同类型的支持如何影响地方社区对这些资源的治理,人们知之甚少。我们通过对关键信息提供者的访谈从斐济收集的数据表明,合作伙伴的支持与海洋资源的有效社区治理之间没有明确的联系。虽然在调查伙伴支持对村庄一级参与和感知决策公平的影响时没有明显的关联,但在调查社会群体的反应时发现了一些意义。然而,在合作伙伴和社区之间的互动类型方面,我们确实发现了一个更清晰的信号,例如,区域会议与社区对传统渔场边界的了解增加有关,村庄会议与加强生态系统监测有关。我们的工作强调需要评估来自合作伙伴组织的不同类型的支持,以及它们与社区互动的方式,如何影响以社区为基础的保护倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信