Effects of Soil Nonlinearity on Physics-Based Ground Motion Simulation and Their Implications on 1D Site Response Analysis: An Application to Istanbul

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Wenyang Zhang, Yufeng Dong, Jorge G. F. Crempien, Pedro Arduino, Ertugrul Taciroglu
{"title":"Effects of Soil Nonlinearity on Physics-Based Ground Motion Simulation and Their Implications on 1D Site Response Analysis: An Application to Istanbul","authors":"Wenyang Zhang,&nbsp;Yufeng Dong,&nbsp;Jorge G. F. Crempien,&nbsp;Pedro Arduino,&nbsp;Ertugrul Taciroglu","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Previously, we have conducted a suite of 57 broadband physics-based ground motion simulations (GMSs) for a region in Istanbul, Turkey, in which soils were modeled as linear elastic materials. However, from a geotechnical earthquake engineering point of view, soil can indeed exhibit nonlinear behavior, especially in shallow crust with soft soil layers and when subjected to strong ground shaking induced by seismic waves, and hence affect the wave propagation and ground motions. To quantitatively investigate the effects of soil nonlinearity on ground motions, in this study, we select four representative earthquake scenarios and perform fully nonlinear broadband (0–8 Hz) GMSs using a 3D bounding surface plasticity model. In addition, utilizing the motions at the bedrock level from 3D simulations, we conduct 1D nonlinear site response analyses (SRAs) for 2912 sites with different bedrock depths and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$V_s$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> profiles. Results indicate that compared to 3D nonlinear simulations, the 3D linear cases can both amplify and de-amplify ground motion intensities, depending on the ground shaking levels, while the 1D nonlinear SRAs are inclined to yield over-estimations, especially for vertical motions. Twelve stations are also selected to further evaluate the applicability of 1D SRA when soil nonlinearity is considered. Some features in 1D soil profiles, such as <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$V_s$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> reversal and deep bedrock depth, are shown to yield unreliably under- and over-estimations, and therefore dramatically influence the accuracy of SRA predictions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 9","pages":"2194-2211"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previously, we have conducted a suite of 57 broadband physics-based ground motion simulations (GMSs) for a region in Istanbul, Turkey, in which soils were modeled as linear elastic materials. However, from a geotechnical earthquake engineering point of view, soil can indeed exhibit nonlinear behavior, especially in shallow crust with soft soil layers and when subjected to strong ground shaking induced by seismic waves, and hence affect the wave propagation and ground motions. To quantitatively investigate the effects of soil nonlinearity on ground motions, in this study, we select four representative earthquake scenarios and perform fully nonlinear broadband (0–8 Hz) GMSs using a 3D bounding surface plasticity model. In addition, utilizing the motions at the bedrock level from 3D simulations, we conduct 1D nonlinear site response analyses (SRAs) for 2912 sites with different bedrock depths and V s $V_s$ profiles. Results indicate that compared to 3D nonlinear simulations, the 3D linear cases can both amplify and de-amplify ground motion intensities, depending on the ground shaking levels, while the 1D nonlinear SRAs are inclined to yield over-estimations, especially for vertical motions. Twelve stations are also selected to further evaluate the applicability of 1D SRA when soil nonlinearity is considered. Some features in 1D soil profiles, such as V s $V_s$ reversal and deep bedrock depth, are shown to yield unreliably under- and over-estimations, and therefore dramatically influence the accuracy of SRA predictions.

土壤非线性对基于物理的地震动模拟的影响及其对场地一维响应分析的影响:在伊斯坦布尔的应用
此前,我们在土耳其伊斯坦布尔的一个地区进行了一套57个基于宽带物理的地面运动模拟(gms),其中土壤被建模为线弹性材料。然而,从岩土地震工程的角度来看,土壤确实可以表现出非线性行为,特别是在具有软土层的浅层地壳中,当受到地震波引起的强烈地面震动时,从而影响波的传播和地面运动。为了定量研究土壤非线性对地面运动的影响,在本研究中,我们选择了四种具有代表性的地震情景,并使用三维边界面塑性模型进行了全非线性宽带(0-8 Hz) gms。此外,利用三维模拟的基岩水平运动,我们对2912个不同基岩深度和V s$ V_s$剖面的站点进行了一维非线性站点响应分析(sra)。结果表明,与三维非线性模拟相比,三维线性模拟可以放大和缩小地面运动强度,这取决于地面震动水平,而一维非线性sra倾向于产生过高的估计,特别是对于垂直运动。选取12个站点,进一步评价考虑土壤非线性的一维SRA的适用性。一维土壤剖面的一些特征,如V $V $反转和深基岩深度,被证明会产生不可靠的过高或过低估计,从而极大地影响SRA预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信