Wenyang Zhang, Yufeng Dong, Jorge G. F. Crempien, Pedro Arduino, Ertugrul Taciroglu
{"title":"Effects of Soil Nonlinearity on Physics-Based Ground Motion Simulation and Their Implications on 1D Site Response Analysis: An Application to Istanbul","authors":"Wenyang Zhang, Yufeng Dong, Jorge G. F. Crempien, Pedro Arduino, Ertugrul Taciroglu","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Previously, we have conducted a suite of 57 broadband physics-based ground motion simulations (GMSs) for a region in Istanbul, Turkey, in which soils were modeled as linear elastic materials. However, from a geotechnical earthquake engineering point of view, soil can indeed exhibit nonlinear behavior, especially in shallow crust with soft soil layers and when subjected to strong ground shaking induced by seismic waves, and hence affect the wave propagation and ground motions. To quantitatively investigate the effects of soil nonlinearity on ground motions, in this study, we select four representative earthquake scenarios and perform fully nonlinear broadband (0–8 Hz) GMSs using a 3D bounding surface plasticity model. In addition, utilizing the motions at the bedrock level from 3D simulations, we conduct 1D nonlinear site response analyses (SRAs) for 2912 sites with different bedrock depths and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$V_s$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> profiles. Results indicate that compared to 3D nonlinear simulations, the 3D linear cases can both amplify and de-amplify ground motion intensities, depending on the ground shaking levels, while the 1D nonlinear SRAs are inclined to yield over-estimations, especially for vertical motions. Twelve stations are also selected to further evaluate the applicability of 1D SRA when soil nonlinearity is considered. Some features in 1D soil profiles, such as <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$V_s$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> reversal and deep bedrock depth, are shown to yield unreliably under- and over-estimations, and therefore dramatically influence the accuracy of SRA predictions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 9","pages":"2194-2211"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previously, we have conducted a suite of 57 broadband physics-based ground motion simulations (GMSs) for a region in Istanbul, Turkey, in which soils were modeled as linear elastic materials. However, from a geotechnical earthquake engineering point of view, soil can indeed exhibit nonlinear behavior, especially in shallow crust with soft soil layers and when subjected to strong ground shaking induced by seismic waves, and hence affect the wave propagation and ground motions. To quantitatively investigate the effects of soil nonlinearity on ground motions, in this study, we select four representative earthquake scenarios and perform fully nonlinear broadband (0–8 Hz) GMSs using a 3D bounding surface plasticity model. In addition, utilizing the motions at the bedrock level from 3D simulations, we conduct 1D nonlinear site response analyses (SRAs) for 2912 sites with different bedrock depths and profiles. Results indicate that compared to 3D nonlinear simulations, the 3D linear cases can both amplify and de-amplify ground motion intensities, depending on the ground shaking levels, while the 1D nonlinear SRAs are inclined to yield over-estimations, especially for vertical motions. Twelve stations are also selected to further evaluate the applicability of 1D SRA when soil nonlinearity is considered. Some features in 1D soil profiles, such as reversal and deep bedrock depth, are shown to yield unreliably under- and over-estimations, and therefore dramatically influence the accuracy of SRA predictions.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following:
ground motions for analysis and design
geotechnical earthquake engineering
probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis
experimental behaviour of structures
seismic protective systems
system identification
risk assessment
seismic code requirements
methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.