Impact of social isolation on mental health changes by socio-economic status: A moderated mediation analysis among non-migrant, migrant, and refugee subpopulations in Germany, 2016–2020

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Victoria Touzel , Doreen Reifegerste , Kayvan Bozorgmehr , Louise Biddle
{"title":"Impact of social isolation on mental health changes by socio-economic status: A moderated mediation analysis among non-migrant, migrant, and refugee subpopulations in Germany, 2016–2020","authors":"Victoria Touzel ,&nbsp;Doreen Reifegerste ,&nbsp;Kayvan Bozorgmehr ,&nbsp;Louise Biddle","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Populations experiencing precarity face heightened mental health inequities, especially during crises. In this regard, it is established that socio-economic status (SES) and social isolation are critical factors influencing mental health outcomes, which interact syndemically. Understanding their interrelated mechanisms is crucial for developing effective public health strategies to support populations experiencing precarity in future crises.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (2016–2020) were analysed in a longitudinal design. A moderated mediation analysis examined the effect of SES on mental health (PHQ4) prior to and during the pandemic, with social isolation change as mediator and migration status as moderator, distinguishing non-migrant (n = 3841), migrant (n = 766), and refugee (n = 331) subpopulations. The model was adjusted using month of interview, baseline PHQ-4 scores, age, gender, and baseline social isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>High SES was linked to smaller mental health declines compared to low SES (β = −0.635, 95 % CI: −0.822, −0.447). This effect was partially mediated by change in social isolation (−0.049, 95 % CI: −0.082, −0.015). The mediation effect was weaker in non-migrant (−0.030, 95 % CI: −0.066, 0.005) and non-significant in migrant subpopulations (−0.062, 95 % CI: −0.157, 0.034). For refugees, SES effects were non-significant, with baseline and changes in social isolation playing a more critical role.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>SES and social isolation critically influenced mental health changes, with substantial variability across subpopulations. Targeted interventions addressing SES inequities and fostering social connections are essential for mitigating mental health disparities, particularly among low SES groups, migrants, and refugees.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101822"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235282732500076X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Populations experiencing precarity face heightened mental health inequities, especially during crises. In this regard, it is established that socio-economic status (SES) and social isolation are critical factors influencing mental health outcomes, which interact syndemically. Understanding their interrelated mechanisms is crucial for developing effective public health strategies to support populations experiencing precarity in future crises.

Methods

Data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (2016–2020) were analysed in a longitudinal design. A moderated mediation analysis examined the effect of SES on mental health (PHQ4) prior to and during the pandemic, with social isolation change as mediator and migration status as moderator, distinguishing non-migrant (n = 3841), migrant (n = 766), and refugee (n = 331) subpopulations. The model was adjusted using month of interview, baseline PHQ-4 scores, age, gender, and baseline social isolation.

Results

High SES was linked to smaller mental health declines compared to low SES (β = −0.635, 95 % CI: −0.822, −0.447). This effect was partially mediated by change in social isolation (−0.049, 95 % CI: −0.082, −0.015). The mediation effect was weaker in non-migrant (−0.030, 95 % CI: −0.066, 0.005) and non-significant in migrant subpopulations (−0.062, 95 % CI: −0.157, 0.034). For refugees, SES effects were non-significant, with baseline and changes in social isolation playing a more critical role.

Findings

SES and social isolation critically influenced mental health changes, with substantial variability across subpopulations. Targeted interventions addressing SES inequities and fostering social connections are essential for mitigating mental health disparities, particularly among low SES groups, migrants, and refugees.
社会经济地位对社会隔离对心理健康变化的影响:2016-2020年德国非移民、移民和难民亚群的有调节中介分析
处于不稳定状态的人群面临着更严重的精神卫生不公平现象,特别是在危机期间。在这方面,社会经济地位(SES)和社会孤立是影响心理健康结果的关键因素,两者相互作用。了解其相互关联的机制对于制定有效的公共卫生战略以支持在未来危机中处于不稳定状态的人口至关重要。方法采用纵向设计对德国社会经济调查小组(2016-2020)的数据进行分析。一项有调节的中介分析考察了社会经济地位在大流行之前和期间对心理健康(PHQ4)的影响,其中社会隔离变化是中介因素,移民身份是调节因素,区分了非移民(n = 3841)、移民(n = 766)和难民(n = 331)亚群。使用访谈月份、基线PHQ-4分数、年龄、性别和基线社会隔离对模型进行调整。结果与低社会经济地位相比,高社会经济地位与较小的心理健康下降相关(β = - 0.635, 95% CI: - 0.822, - 0.447)。社会隔离的改变部分介导了这种效应(- 0.049,95% CI: - 0.082, - 0.015)。非移民群体的中介效应较弱(- 0.030,95% CI: - 0.066, 0.005),移民亚群的中介效应不显著(- 0.062,95% CI: - 0.157, 0.034)。对难民而言,社会经济状况的影响不显著,社会孤立的基线和变化起着更为关键的作用。研究结果表明,社会交往和社会孤立严重影响心理健康变化,在不同亚人群中存在很大差异。解决社会经济地位不平等问题和促进社会联系的有针对性的干预措施对于减轻心理健康差距至关重要,特别是在社会经济地位低的群体、移民和难民之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ssm-Population Health
Ssm-Population Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
298
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信