Hayfa Jabnoun-Khiareddine , Rania Aydi Ben Abdallah , Messaoud Mars , Mejda Daami-Remadi
{"title":"Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Pestalotiopsis clavispora and Fusarium spp. associated with pomegranate dieback and fruit rot in Tunisia","authors":"Hayfa Jabnoun-Khiareddine , Rania Aydi Ben Abdallah , Messaoud Mars , Mejda Daami-Remadi","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tunisia is one of the main pomegranate (<em>Punica granatum</em> L.) producing countries. Between 2018 and 2021, a 15–20 % incidence of dieback and fruit rot was observed in many pomegranate orchards along Tunisian coasts. Faced with this issue, the current study aimed to characterize the etiological agents associated with these symptoms. Morphological characterization combined with multigene-combined phylogenetic analyses revealed that five fungal species namely <em>Lasiodiplodia theobromae</em>, <em>Neopestalotiopsis clavispora</em>, <em>Fusarium equiseti</em>, <em>F. brachygibbosum</em>, and <em>F. incarnatum</em> were involved in branch dieback, while <em>L</em>. <em>theobromae</em> and <em>F. proliferatum</em> species were associated with pomegranate fruit rot symptoms. As far as our knowledge extends, this is the first report of the involvement of these fungal species in pomegranate dieback and fruit rot in Tunisia and in Africa. Pathogenicity tests carried out through inoculation of detached pomegranate cv. Gabsi shoots and fruits showed that all tested fungal species were pathogenic by inducing disease symptoms with different degrees of severity. Given the rapid and severe progress of these diseases, it is critical to implement prevention and management strategies to alleviate their incidence and reduce tree losses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tunisia is one of the main pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) producing countries. Between 2018 and 2021, a 15–20 % incidence of dieback and fruit rot was observed in many pomegranate orchards along Tunisian coasts. Faced with this issue, the current study aimed to characterize the etiological agents associated with these symptoms. Morphological characterization combined with multigene-combined phylogenetic analyses revealed that five fungal species namely Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Neopestalotiopsis clavispora, Fusarium equiseti, F. brachygibbosum, and F. incarnatum were involved in branch dieback, while L. theobromae and F. proliferatum species were associated with pomegranate fruit rot symptoms. As far as our knowledge extends, this is the first report of the involvement of these fungal species in pomegranate dieback and fruit rot in Tunisia and in Africa. Pathogenicity tests carried out through inoculation of detached pomegranate cv. Gabsi shoots and fruits showed that all tested fungal species were pathogenic by inducing disease symptoms with different degrees of severity. Given the rapid and severe progress of these diseases, it is critical to implement prevention and management strategies to alleviate their incidence and reduce tree losses.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.