The political economy of occupational health and safety regulation: The contentious path to criminalizing work-related deaths in South Korea

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Juyeon Lee , Erica Di Ruggiero
{"title":"The political economy of occupational health and safety regulation: The contentious path to criminalizing work-related deaths in South Korea","authors":"Juyeon Lee ,&nbsp;Erica Di Ruggiero","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the recent trend toward the criminalization of work-related deaths in South Korea through the lens of Bob Jessop's Strategic-Relational Approach, analyzing how structural constraints, contingent opportunities, and labor's strategic agency shaped the enactment of the 2021 Serious Accidents Punishment Act (SAPA). Using qualitative methods, including document analysis and key informant interviews, we trace the historical evolution of South Korea's occupational health and safety regulatory framework within its broader political-economic context. We argue that the push for corporate criminal liability emerged from the margins, led by non-unionized, precarious workers whose grievances remained largely unaddressed by mainstream labor movement. In an environment where formal mechanisms for worker participation were either absent or structurally weakened, confrontational demands for criminalization gained traction as an alternative strategy to contest entrenched power asymmetries. However, SAPA's legislative process and implementation reveal that state institutions selectively mediated these demands, incorporating key compromises – such as a narrow focus on individual rather than systemic corporate liability – that limited the law's transformative potential. Our findings contribute to critical legal and public health scholarship by demonstrating that the criminalization of work-related deaths in South Korea was not a state-driven initiative to enhance worker protections but rather a contested outcome shaped by labor's strategic adaptation within structurally selective institutions that have historically privileged corporate interests. Nevertheless, SAPA's limitations underscore its potential as a site of ongoing political struggle, wherein its enforcement – or lack thereof – may catalyze broader labor mobilization and structural reforms addressing the systemic causes of work-related deaths.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 118240"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the recent trend toward the criminalization of work-related deaths in South Korea through the lens of Bob Jessop's Strategic-Relational Approach, analyzing how structural constraints, contingent opportunities, and labor's strategic agency shaped the enactment of the 2021 Serious Accidents Punishment Act (SAPA). Using qualitative methods, including document analysis and key informant interviews, we trace the historical evolution of South Korea's occupational health and safety regulatory framework within its broader political-economic context. We argue that the push for corporate criminal liability emerged from the margins, led by non-unionized, precarious workers whose grievances remained largely unaddressed by mainstream labor movement. In an environment where formal mechanisms for worker participation were either absent or structurally weakened, confrontational demands for criminalization gained traction as an alternative strategy to contest entrenched power asymmetries. However, SAPA's legislative process and implementation reveal that state institutions selectively mediated these demands, incorporating key compromises – such as a narrow focus on individual rather than systemic corporate liability – that limited the law's transformative potential. Our findings contribute to critical legal and public health scholarship by demonstrating that the criminalization of work-related deaths in South Korea was not a state-driven initiative to enhance worker protections but rather a contested outcome shaped by labor's strategic adaptation within structurally selective institutions that have historically privileged corporate interests. Nevertheless, SAPA's limitations underscore its potential as a site of ongoing political struggle, wherein its enforcement – or lack thereof – may catalyze broader labor mobilization and structural reforms addressing the systemic causes of work-related deaths.
职业健康和安全监管的政治经济学:韩国与工作有关的死亡定罪的争议之路
本研究通过Bob Jessop的战略关系方法考察了韩国最近将与工作有关的死亡定罪的趋势,分析了结构约束、偶然机会和劳工的战略代理如何影响了2021年《严重事故处罚法案》(SAPA)的制定。使用定性方法,包括文件分析和关键线人访谈,我们在其更广泛的政治经济背景下追溯韩国职业健康和安全监管框架的历史演变。我们认为,推动企业刑事责任的力量来自边缘,由非工会、不稳定的工人领导,他们的不满在很大程度上没有得到主流劳工运动的解决。在工人参与的正式机制缺失或结构弱化的环境中,对抗性的定罪要求作为对抗根深蒂固的权力不对称的另一种策略获得了吸引力。然而,SAPA的立法过程和实施表明,国家机构选择性地调解了这些要求,纳入了关键的妥协——比如对个人责任的狭隘关注,而不是系统性的公司责任——这限制了法律的变革潜力。我们的研究结果有助于重要的法律和公共卫生学术研究,因为它表明,在韩国,将与工作有关的死亡定为刑事犯罪并不是国家推动的一项旨在加强工人保护的举措,而是一种有争议的结果,这种结果是由劳工在具有历史特权的企业利益的结构性选择性机构内的战略适应所形成的。然而,SAPA的局限性强调了它作为持续政治斗争场所的潜力,其中它的执行-或缺乏-可能催化更广泛的劳工动员和结构性改革,解决与工作有关的死亡的系统性原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信