Association between cardiac rehabilitation and LDL-levels, adherence to guideline-recommended medication and mortality rate after myocardial infarction
Ahmad Agam , David Vadsholt , Kristian Kragholm , Lauge Klement Moltke Østergaard , Peter Bisgaard Stæhr , Gitte Nielsen , Henrik Vadmann
{"title":"Association between cardiac rehabilitation and LDL-levels, adherence to guideline-recommended medication and mortality rate after myocardial infarction","authors":"Ahmad Agam , David Vadsholt , Kristian Kragholm , Lauge Klement Moltke Østergaard , Peter Bisgaard Stæhr , Gitte Nielsen , Henrik Vadmann","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aims to identify three-month and one year mortality rate, LDL level and adherence to guideline-recommended medication in patients with myocardial infarct (MI) receiving cardiac rehabilitation (CR) compared to patients who do not.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this retrospective study, patients hospitalized in North Denmark Regional Hospital in Hjoerring (capture population 200.000) with acute coronary syndrome between January 1st, 2017, to December 31st, 2021, were included. Baseline characteristics, initial treatment of revascularization and all-cause mortality were examined through the Danish National Patient Registry, the Regional Cardiac Rehabilitation Database, and medical chart review. Patients were grouped by revascularization (yes/no) during hospitalization and CR. Adjusted Cox proportional regression model was used to assess differences in mortality and LDL levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1209 myocardial infarction (MI) survivors were included in this study. A total of 1209 myocardial infarction (MI) survivors were included. Significant LDL reductions at 6- and 12-month follow-ups were observed in patients receiving both cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and lipid-modifying therapy at baseline (p = .001), but not in those without CR. In revascularized patients, use of multiple antithrombotic agents was lower in the no CR group at three months (57.1 % vs 78.8 %, p = .002) and one year (60 % vs 78.5 %, p = .010). Three-month mortality rate was higher among patients who did not undergo CR, both in the revascularization group (19 % vs 2 %, p = 0.001) and the non-revascularization group (18 % vs 3 %, p = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients undergoing CR were associated with lower LDL-levels, higher adherence to guideline-recommended medication and lower mortality rate at three-month follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 200444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525000820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
This study aims to identify three-month and one year mortality rate, LDL level and adherence to guideline-recommended medication in patients with myocardial infarct (MI) receiving cardiac rehabilitation (CR) compared to patients who do not.
Method
In this retrospective study, patients hospitalized in North Denmark Regional Hospital in Hjoerring (capture population 200.000) with acute coronary syndrome between January 1st, 2017, to December 31st, 2021, were included. Baseline characteristics, initial treatment of revascularization and all-cause mortality were examined through the Danish National Patient Registry, the Regional Cardiac Rehabilitation Database, and medical chart review. Patients were grouped by revascularization (yes/no) during hospitalization and CR. Adjusted Cox proportional regression model was used to assess differences in mortality and LDL levels.
Results
A total of 1209 myocardial infarction (MI) survivors were included in this study. A total of 1209 myocardial infarction (MI) survivors were included. Significant LDL reductions at 6- and 12-month follow-ups were observed in patients receiving both cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and lipid-modifying therapy at baseline (p = .001), but not in those without CR. In revascularized patients, use of multiple antithrombotic agents was lower in the no CR group at three months (57.1 % vs 78.8 %, p = .002) and one year (60 % vs 78.5 %, p = .010). Three-month mortality rate was higher among patients who did not undergo CR, both in the revascularization group (19 % vs 2 %, p = 0.001) and the non-revascularization group (18 % vs 3 %, p = 0.001).
Conclusion
Patients undergoing CR were associated with lower LDL-levels, higher adherence to guideline-recommended medication and lower mortality rate at three-month follow-up.
目的:本研究旨在确定接受心脏康复(CR)的心肌梗死(MI)患者与未接受心脏康复(CR)的患者的3个月和1年死亡率、LDL水平和对指南推荐药物的依从性。方法回顾性研究纳入2017年1月1日至2021年12月31日在约林北丹麦地区医院住院的急性冠状动脉综合征患者(捕获人口20万)。基线特征、血运重建的初始治疗和全因死亡率通过丹麦国家患者登记处、区域心脏康复数据库和医疗图表审查进行检查。根据住院期间血运重建术(是/否)和CR对患者进行分组,采用调整后的Cox比例回归模型评估死亡率和LDL水平的差异。结果共纳入1209例心肌梗死(MI)幸存者。共纳入1209例心肌梗死(MI)幸存者。在6个月和12个月的随访中,同时接受心脏康复(CR)和脂质调节治疗的患者LDL显著降低(p = 0.001),但在没有CR的患者中没有。在血管重建术患者中,无CR组在3个月(57.1%对78.8%,p = 0.002)和1年(60%对78.5%,p = 0.010)时使用多种抗血栓药物较低。在血管重建术组(19% vs 2%, p = 0.001)和非血管重建术组(18% vs 3%, p = 0.001)中,未接受CR的患者三个月死亡率更高。结论CR患者在3个月随访时ldl水平较低,对指南推荐药物的依从性较高,死亡率较低。