Dongdong Shi , Qiao Wang , Juan Chen , Ruggiero Lovreglio , Wei Yang , Jian Ma
{"title":"Exploring the influence of flooding conditions on crowd evacuation: An experimental study","authors":"Dongdong Shi , Qiao Wang , Juan Chen , Ruggiero Lovreglio , Wei Yang , Jian Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the impact of dynamic water flow on crowd evacuation is essential for improving pedestrian safety under urban floods. Previous research has primarily focused on studying pedestrian movement characteristics in static water scenarios, whereas investigations of pedestrian evacuation under dynamic water flow are still rare. In this study, a series of bottleneck evacuation experiments were performed using a novel experimental flooding setup. Five inflow depths, i.e., 0, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 m, corresponding to five water flow rates, i.e., 0, 0.225, 0.3, 0.375, and 0.45 m<sup>3</sup>/s, were designed to simulate dynamic water flow in bottleneck layouts. Two evacuation strategies, including individual evacuation and cooperative evacuation, were considered. How inflow depths and evacuation strategies affect density, speed, and nearest-neighbor distribution at the bottleneck is explored. Our findings demonstrate that the pedestrian speed and flow rate in cooperative scenarios are higher than those in individual scenarios. Total evacuation times are 21.7 %, 10.77 %, 5 %, and 14.85 % faster in cooperative scenarios than those in individual scenarios at inflow depths of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 m. These results will offer valuable insights for calibrating flood evacuation models and improving crowd management during emergencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104868"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002780","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the impact of dynamic water flow on crowd evacuation is essential for improving pedestrian safety under urban floods. Previous research has primarily focused on studying pedestrian movement characteristics in static water scenarios, whereas investigations of pedestrian evacuation under dynamic water flow are still rare. In this study, a series of bottleneck evacuation experiments were performed using a novel experimental flooding setup. Five inflow depths, i.e., 0, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 m, corresponding to five water flow rates, i.e., 0, 0.225, 0.3, 0.375, and 0.45 m3/s, were designed to simulate dynamic water flow in bottleneck layouts. Two evacuation strategies, including individual evacuation and cooperative evacuation, were considered. How inflow depths and evacuation strategies affect density, speed, and nearest-neighbor distribution at the bottleneck is explored. Our findings demonstrate that the pedestrian speed and flow rate in cooperative scenarios are higher than those in individual scenarios. Total evacuation times are 21.7 %, 10.77 %, 5 %, and 14.85 % faster in cooperative scenarios than those in individual scenarios at inflow depths of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 m. These results will offer valuable insights for calibrating flood evacuation models and improving crowd management during emergencies.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.