Prevalence, incidence, systemic, behavioral, and patient-related risk factors and indicators for peri-implant diseases: An AO/AAP  systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza, Sarah Pagni, Matthew Finkelman, Todd Schoenbaum, Leandro Chambrone
{"title":"Prevalence, incidence, systemic, behavioral, and patient-related risk factors and indicators for peri-implant diseases: An AO/AAP  systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza,&nbsp;Sarah Pagni,&nbsp;Matthew Finkelman,&nbsp;Todd Schoenbaum,&nbsp;Leandro Chambrone","doi":"10.1002/JPER.24-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A profound understanding of the epidemiology of peri-implant diseases (PIDs) is essential for the development of preventive approaches to mitigate the occurrence and progression of peri-implant biological complications. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the incidence, prevalence, systemic, behavioral, and patient-related risk indicators and factors for PIDs in adult patients with dental implants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical studies assessing the prevalence, incidence, systemic risk indicators, and risk factors for PIDs were considered eligible for inclusion. MEDLINE–PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov electronic databases were searched for published articles. Pooled data analyses were performed using random-effects models to identify risk indicators and factors for PIDs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 1120 potentially eligible records, 102 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. Prevalence rates at the patient level for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis were 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41–51) and 21% (95% CI, 17–24), respectively. Weighted mean incidence rates at the patient level for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis were 53% and 22%, respectively, within 20 years of function. Pooled estimates identified periodontitis, obesity, and smoking habits as significant systemic risk indicators for mucositis. For peri-implantitis, the significant risk indicators were periodontitis, diabetes mellitus, smoking habits, and alcohol consumption. Only risk indicators could be identified in the selected evidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>More than half of the patients treated with dental implants were affected by PIDs over a 10-year follow-up period, with peri-implant mucositis being the most prevalent condition. Periodontitis and smoking were identified as risk indicators for the development of both PIDs. Obesity was identified as a potential risk indicator for mucositis, while diabetes mellitus and alcohol consumption were recognized as potential risk indicators for peri-implantitis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review looked at the causes and frequency of problems around dental implants, known as PIDs, which include conditions like peri-implant mucositis (inflammation around the implant) and peri-implantitis (more serious infection around the implant). Understanding these conditions and their etiology is important for finding ways to prevent them. This research reviewed 102 studies (including 13,030 patients) to gather data on how often these problems occur and what factors might increase the risk of developing them. The meta-analyses revealed that nearly half of people with dental implants had peri-implant mucositis, and about one in five had peri-implantitis. Over a period of 20 years, the incidence rates for developing these conditions were about 53% for mucositis and 22% for peri-implantitis. The study identified certain health and lifestyle factors that could increase the risk of these conditions. For mucositis, risk factors included having gum disease (periodontitis), obesity, and smoking. For peri-implantitis, the risks were similar, with periodontitis, smoking, and diabetes and alcohol use being important factors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"96 6","pages":"587-633"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/JPER.24-0154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/JPER.24-0154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A profound understanding of the epidemiology of peri-implant diseases (PIDs) is essential for the development of preventive approaches to mitigate the occurrence and progression of peri-implant biological complications. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the incidence, prevalence, systemic, behavioral, and patient-related risk indicators and factors for PIDs in adult patients with dental implants.

Methods

Clinical studies assessing the prevalence, incidence, systemic risk indicators, and risk factors for PIDs were considered eligible for inclusion. MEDLINE–PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov electronic databases were searched for published articles. Pooled data analyses were performed using random-effects models to identify risk indicators and factors for PIDs.

Results

Of 1120 potentially eligible records, 102 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. Prevalence rates at the patient level for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis were 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41–51) and 21% (95% CI, 17–24), respectively. Weighted mean incidence rates at the patient level for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis were 53% and 22%, respectively, within 20 years of function. Pooled estimates identified periodontitis, obesity, and smoking habits as significant systemic risk indicators for mucositis. For peri-implantitis, the significant risk indicators were periodontitis, diabetes mellitus, smoking habits, and alcohol consumption. Only risk indicators could be identified in the selected evidence.

Conclusion

More than half of the patients treated with dental implants were affected by PIDs over a 10-year follow-up period, with peri-implant mucositis being the most prevalent condition. Periodontitis and smoking were identified as risk indicators for the development of both PIDs. Obesity was identified as a potential risk indicator for mucositis, while diabetes mellitus and alcohol consumption were recognized as potential risk indicators for peri-implantitis.

Plain Language Summary

This systematic review looked at the causes and frequency of problems around dental implants, known as PIDs, which include conditions like peri-implant mucositis (inflammation around the implant) and peri-implantitis (more serious infection around the implant). Understanding these conditions and their etiology is important for finding ways to prevent them. This research reviewed 102 studies (including 13,030 patients) to gather data on how often these problems occur and what factors might increase the risk of developing them. The meta-analyses revealed that nearly half of people with dental implants had peri-implant mucositis, and about one in five had peri-implantitis. Over a period of 20 years, the incidence rates for developing these conditions were about 53% for mucositis and 22% for peri-implantitis. The study identified certain health and lifestyle factors that could increase the risk of these conditions. For mucositis, risk factors included having gum disease (periodontitis), obesity, and smoking. For peri-implantitis, the risks were similar, with periodontitis, smoking, and diabetes and alcohol use being important factors.

Abstract Image

种植体周围疾病的患病率、发病率、系统、行为和患者相关的危险因素和指标:一项AO/AAP系统综述和荟萃分析
深入了解种植体周围疾病(pid)的流行病学对于制定预防措施以减轻种植体周围生物学并发症的发生和发展至关重要。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估种植牙成人患者发生pip的发生率、患病率、全身、行为和患者相关的危险指标和因素。方法评估PIDs的患病率、发病率、系统性风险指标和危险因素的临床研究被认为符合纳入标准。检索MEDLINE-PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane中央图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov电子数据库,查找已发表的文章。使用随机效应模型进行汇总数据分析,以确定pid的风险指标和因素。结果在1120份可能符合条件的记录中,102项研究符合资格标准,被纳入本系统评价。患者水平种植体周围粘膜炎和种植体周围炎的患病率分别为46%(95%置信区间[CI], 41-51)和21% (95% CI, 17-24)。在患者水平上,20年内种植体周围粘膜炎和种植体周围炎的加权平均发病率分别为53%和22%。综合估计确定牙周炎、肥胖和吸烟习惯是黏膜炎的重要系统性风险指标。对于种植体周围炎,显著的危险指标是牙周炎、糖尿病、吸烟习惯和饮酒。在选定的证据中只能识别出风险指标。结论在10年的随访期间,超过一半的种植体患者出现了盆腔炎,种植体周围粘膜炎是最常见的情况。牙周炎和吸烟被确定为两种PID发展的危险指标。肥胖被认为是粘膜炎的潜在危险指标,而糖尿病和饮酒被认为是种植体周围炎的潜在危险指标。本系统综述研究了牙种植体周围问题的原因和频率,称为PID,包括种植体周围粘膜炎(种植体周围的炎症)和种植体周围炎(种植体周围更严重的感染)。了解这些疾病及其病因对于找到预防方法非常重要。这项研究回顾了102项研究(包括13030名患者),以收集这些问题发生的频率以及哪些因素可能增加患这些问题的风险的数据。荟萃分析显示,近一半的种植体患者患有种植体周围粘膜炎,约五分之一的患者患有种植体周围炎。在20年的时间里,黏膜炎的发生率约为53%,种植体周围炎的发生率约为22%。该研究确定了某些健康和生活方式因素可能会增加患这些疾病的风险。对于粘膜炎,危险因素包括牙龈疾病(牙周炎)、肥胖和吸烟。对于种植体周围炎,风险相似,牙周炎、吸烟、糖尿病和饮酒是重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信