Sites of Conscience as Sites of Protest: How Victims Use Place to Advance Their Claims

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Claire Greenstein
{"title":"Sites of Conscience as Sites of Protest: How Victims Use Place to Advance Their Claims","authors":"Claire Greenstein","doi":"10.1093/ips/olaf021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sites of mass trauma, or “sites of conscience,” have symbolic power that makes them ideal locations for honoring the people who suffered there, educating about history, and advocating for human rights. This article argues that sites of conscience can also be resources for victimized groups because these sites are places, not just spaces, and therefore hold authenticity, symbolism, and moral power. It further argues that, when victims have a personal connection to places of trauma, this connection amplifies the effectiveness and strengthens the framing of protests held there by people who were victimized at the site. With the example of German Sinti and Roma in the late 1970s–early 1980s, I show how using sites of conscience as a resource for protests enabled Romani Germans to frame their claims in a way that attracted more attention and support than they otherwise garnered. Ultimately, I demonstrate that when victims use the sites of their own victimization as resources for protest, they are more likely to advance their rights claims than if they protest at less symbolically meaningful locations.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olaf021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sites of mass trauma, or “sites of conscience,” have symbolic power that makes them ideal locations for honoring the people who suffered there, educating about history, and advocating for human rights. This article argues that sites of conscience can also be resources for victimized groups because these sites are places, not just spaces, and therefore hold authenticity, symbolism, and moral power. It further argues that, when victims have a personal connection to places of trauma, this connection amplifies the effectiveness and strengthens the framing of protests held there by people who were victimized at the site. With the example of German Sinti and Roma in the late 1970s–early 1980s, I show how using sites of conscience as a resource for protests enabled Romani Germans to frame their claims in a way that attracted more attention and support than they otherwise garnered. Ultimately, I demonstrate that when victims use the sites of their own victimization as resources for protest, they are more likely to advance their rights claims than if they protest at less symbolically meaningful locations.
作为抗议场所的良心场所:受害者如何利用场所来推进他们的诉求
大规模创伤遗址或“良心遗址”具有象征性的力量,使它们成为纪念在那里遭受苦难的人、教育历史和倡导人权的理想场所。本文认为,良心遗址也可以成为受害群体的资源,因为这些遗址是场所,而不仅仅是空间,因此具有真实性、象征意义和道德力量。缔约国还认为,当受害者与创伤地点有个人联系时,这种联系就会扩大效力,并加强在现场受害的人在那里举行抗议的框架。以20世纪70年代末至80年代初的德国辛提人和罗姆人为例,我展示了如何利用良心网站作为抗议活动的资源,使罗姆裔德国人能够以一种吸引更多关注和支持的方式提出自己的主张。最后,我证明,当受害者使用自己受害的网站作为抗议的资源时,他们更有可能推进自己的权利要求,而不是在没有象征意义的地方抗议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: International Political Sociology (IPS), responds to the need for more productive collaboration among political sociologists, international relations specialists and sociopolitical theorists. It is especially concerned with challenges arising from contemporary transformations of social, political, and global orders given the statist forms of traditional sociologies and the marginalization of social processes in many approaches to international relations. IPS is committed to theoretical innovation, new modes of empirical research and the geographical and cultural diversification of research beyond the usual circuits of European and North-American scholarship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信