New topical molecular targeted therapies for atopic dermatitis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.5
Hiroki Murai, Norio Kawamoto, Tomoyuki Arima, Yuki Okada, Haruko Takeuchi, Manabu Miyamoto, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Masaki Futamura, Hidehisa Saeki, Yukihiro Ohya
{"title":"New topical molecular targeted therapies for atopic dermatitis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hiroki Murai, Norio Kawamoto, Tomoyuki Arima, Yuki Okada, Haruko Takeuchi, Manabu Miyamoto, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Masaki Futamura, Hidehisa Saeki, Yukihiro Ohya","doi":"10.1111/pai.70122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Topical molecular targeted therapies have recently emerged for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), but their efficacy and safety, particularly in children, remain underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical targeted therapies in children with AD. We conducted a comprehensive search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ICHUSHI databases for articles published up to January 7, 2023, based on a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022366449). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating new topical targeted therapies in children (≤18 years) with AD were included. The primary outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores and treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included additional efficacy and safety analyses. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4, with bias risk assessed via the RoB 2 tool. Nine studies (reported in eight articles) involving 2182 patients were included, with 1469 children treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (ruxolitinib and delgocitinib) and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (crisaborole, lotamilast, and difamilast). These interventions significantly improved EASI scores, with the least square mean change (mean difference: -56.67%; 95% confidence interval [-59.16% to -54.18%]). Additionally, topical targeted therapies did not increase the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (risk difference: 0.00; 95% confidence interval [-0.02 to 0.02]). The risk of bias was low across all outcomes. New topical targeted therapies administered over 4 weeks are effective and safe for children with atopic dermatitis aged ≤18 years. Further studies are needed to establish their long-term safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520742,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","volume":"36 6","pages":"e70122"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.70122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Topical molecular targeted therapies have recently emerged for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), but their efficacy and safety, particularly in children, remain underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical targeted therapies in children with AD. We conducted a comprehensive search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ICHUSHI databases for articles published up to January 7, 2023, based on a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022366449). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating new topical targeted therapies in children (≤18 years) with AD were included. The primary outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores and treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included additional efficacy and safety analyses. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4, with bias risk assessed via the RoB 2 tool. Nine studies (reported in eight articles) involving 2182 patients were included, with 1469 children treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (ruxolitinib and delgocitinib) and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (crisaborole, lotamilast, and difamilast). These interventions significantly improved EASI scores, with the least square mean change (mean difference: -56.67%; 95% confidence interval [-59.16% to -54.18%]). Additionally, topical targeted therapies did not increase the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (risk difference: 0.00; 95% confidence interval [-0.02 to 0.02]). The risk of bias was low across all outcomes. New topical targeted therapies administered over 4 weeks are effective and safe for children with atopic dermatitis aged ≤18 years. Further studies are needed to establish their long-term safety and efficacy.

新的局部分子靶向治疗儿童特应性皮炎:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
局部分子靶向疗法最近出现用于治疗特应性皮炎(AD),但其有效性和安全性,特别是对儿童的有效性和安全性仍未得到充分研究。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估局部靶向治疗儿童AD的有效性和安全性。我们基于在PROSPERO (CRD42022366449)注册的协议,对CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase和ICHUSHI数据库进行了全面检索,检索截止到2023年1月7日发表的文章。随机对照试验(RCTs)研究了新的局部靶向治疗儿童(≤18岁)AD。主要结局是湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)评分和治疗相关不良事件。次要结果包括额外的疗效和安全性分析。采用Revman 5.4进行meta分析,通过RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险。纳入了9项研究(8篇文章报道),涉及2182名患者,其中1469名儿童接受了Janus激酶抑制剂(ruxolitinib和delgocitinib)和磷酸二酯酶-4抑制剂(crisaborole, lotamilast和difamilast)的治疗。这些干预措施显著提高了EASI评分,平均变化最小(平均差:-56.67%;95%置信区间[-59.16%至-54.18%])。此外,局部靶向治疗并未增加治疗发生不良事件的发生率(风险差异:0.00;95%置信区间[-0.02 ~ 0.02])。所有结果的偏倚风险都很低。新的局部靶向治疗对于年龄≤18岁的特应性皮炎儿童有效且安全。需要进一步的研究来确定它们的长期安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信