{"title":"New topical molecular targeted therapies for atopic dermatitis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hiroki Murai, Norio Kawamoto, Tomoyuki Arima, Yuki Okada, Haruko Takeuchi, Manabu Miyamoto, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Masaki Futamura, Hidehisa Saeki, Yukihiro Ohya","doi":"10.1111/pai.70122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Topical molecular targeted therapies have recently emerged for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), but their efficacy and safety, particularly in children, remain underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical targeted therapies in children with AD. We conducted a comprehensive search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ICHUSHI databases for articles published up to January 7, 2023, based on a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022366449). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating new topical targeted therapies in children (≤18 years) with AD were included. The primary outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores and treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included additional efficacy and safety analyses. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4, with bias risk assessed via the RoB 2 tool. Nine studies (reported in eight articles) involving 2182 patients were included, with 1469 children treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (ruxolitinib and delgocitinib) and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (crisaborole, lotamilast, and difamilast). These interventions significantly improved EASI scores, with the least square mean change (mean difference: -56.67%; 95% confidence interval [-59.16% to -54.18%]). Additionally, topical targeted therapies did not increase the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (risk difference: 0.00; 95% confidence interval [-0.02 to 0.02]). The risk of bias was low across all outcomes. New topical targeted therapies administered over 4 weeks are effective and safe for children with atopic dermatitis aged ≤18 years. Further studies are needed to establish their long-term safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520742,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","volume":"36 6","pages":"e70122"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.70122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Topical molecular targeted therapies have recently emerged for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), but their efficacy and safety, particularly in children, remain underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical targeted therapies in children with AD. We conducted a comprehensive search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ICHUSHI databases for articles published up to January 7, 2023, based on a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022366449). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating new topical targeted therapies in children (≤18 years) with AD were included. The primary outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores and treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included additional efficacy and safety analyses. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4, with bias risk assessed via the RoB 2 tool. Nine studies (reported in eight articles) involving 2182 patients were included, with 1469 children treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (ruxolitinib and delgocitinib) and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (crisaborole, lotamilast, and difamilast). These interventions significantly improved EASI scores, with the least square mean change (mean difference: -56.67%; 95% confidence interval [-59.16% to -54.18%]). Additionally, topical targeted therapies did not increase the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (risk difference: 0.00; 95% confidence interval [-0.02 to 0.02]). The risk of bias was low across all outcomes. New topical targeted therapies administered over 4 weeks are effective and safe for children with atopic dermatitis aged ≤18 years. Further studies are needed to establish their long-term safety and efficacy.