Effects of a Physical Activity mHealth Intervention (Fit2Thrive) on WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis.

IF 3.4
Jean Miki Reading, Payton Solk, Julia Starikovsky, Jing Song, Kristina Hasanaj, Shirlene Wang, Juned Siddique, Melanie Wolter, Julia Frey, Kerry S Courneya, Frank J Penedo, Ronald Ackermann, David Cella, Bonnie Spring, Siobhan M Phillips
{"title":"Effects of a Physical Activity mHealth Intervention (Fit2Thrive) on WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis.","authors":"Jean Miki Reading, Payton Solk, Julia Starikovsky, Jing Song, Kristina Hasanaj, Shirlene Wang, Juned Siddique, Melanie Wolter, Julia Frey, Kerry S Courneya, Frank J Penedo, Ronald Ackermann, David Cella, Bonnie Spring, Siobhan M Phillips","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interventions targeting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) may be a catalyst for improving other lifestyle behaviors in breast cancer survivors (BCS). We examined whether Fit2Thrive, an mHealth MVPA intervention, influenced adherence to cancer prevention recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BCSs (N = 269; age, mean = 52.9; SD = 9.9) received a 12-week mHealth MVPA intervention and were randomized to \"on\" or \"off\" level of five intervention components. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) score was calculated (0 = high cancer risk, 6 = low cancer risk) based on cancer prevention recommendations: sugar-sweetened beverages, fast food, fruit/vegetable intake, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and MVPA (baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks). Mixed-effects models examined changes in the WCRF/AICR score and each risk factor and the effects of each intervention component (telephone support calls, Fitbit Buddy, tailored text messages, deluxe app, online gym) level on the WCRF/AICR score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WCRF/AICR total score significantly improved at 12 and 24 weeks (P values < 0.001). MVPA improved at 12 and 24 weeks (P values < 0.001). Fruit and vegetable consumption improved at 12 weeks (P = 0.01). No changes in other risk factors were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participation in a mHealth MVPA intervention may influence cancer risk in BCS and have effects on certain untargeted behaviors (fruit and vegetable consumption) but not on other risk factors (sugar-sweetened beverages, fast food, body mass index, alcohol consumption). Future work should explore how to maximize these effects and determine if resource-efficient dietary intervention components improve cancer outcomes.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Understanding the impact of an mHealth MVPA intervention on untargeted dietary behaviors may guide the development of scalable interventions targeting lifestyle behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":520580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1322-1331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interventions targeting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) may be a catalyst for improving other lifestyle behaviors in breast cancer survivors (BCS). We examined whether Fit2Thrive, an mHealth MVPA intervention, influenced adherence to cancer prevention recommendations.

Methods: BCSs (N = 269; age, mean = 52.9; SD = 9.9) received a 12-week mHealth MVPA intervention and were randomized to "on" or "off" level of five intervention components. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) score was calculated (0 = high cancer risk, 6 = low cancer risk) based on cancer prevention recommendations: sugar-sweetened beverages, fast food, fruit/vegetable intake, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and MVPA (baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks). Mixed-effects models examined changes in the WCRF/AICR score and each risk factor and the effects of each intervention component (telephone support calls, Fitbit Buddy, tailored text messages, deluxe app, online gym) level on the WCRF/AICR score.

Results: The WCRF/AICR total score significantly improved at 12 and 24 weeks (P values < 0.001). MVPA improved at 12 and 24 weeks (P values < 0.001). Fruit and vegetable consumption improved at 12 weeks (P = 0.01). No changes in other risk factors were observed.

Conclusions: Participation in a mHealth MVPA intervention may influence cancer risk in BCS and have effects on certain untargeted behaviors (fruit and vegetable consumption) but not on other risk factors (sugar-sweetened beverages, fast food, body mass index, alcohol consumption). Future work should explore how to maximize these effects and determine if resource-efficient dietary intervention components improve cancer outcomes.

Impact: Understanding the impact of an mHealth MVPA intervention on untargeted dietary behaviors may guide the development of scalable interventions targeting lifestyle behaviors.

体育活动移动健康干预(Fit2Thrive)对乳腺癌幸存者WCRF/AICR癌症预防评分的影响:一项次要数据分析
背景:针对中高强度身体活动(MVPA)的干预措施可能是改善乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)其他生活方式行为的催化剂。我们研究了Fit2Thrive、mHeath MVPA干预是否会影响对癌症预防建议的依从性。方法:BCS (N=269,年龄(M=52.9;SD=9.9)接受为期12周的mHealth MVPA干预,随机分为5个干预组件的“开”或“关”水平。世界癌症研究基金会国际/美国癌症研究所(WCRF/AICR)评分是根据癌症预防建议计算的(0=高癌症风险,6=低癌症风险):含糖饮料,快餐,水果/蔬菜,体重指数,饮酒和MVPA(基线,12周和24周)。混合效应模型检查了WCRF/AICR评分和每个风险因素的变化,以及每个干预成分(电话支持电话、Fitbit伙伴、定制短信、豪华应用程序、在线健身房)对WCRF/AICR评分水平的影响。结果:WCRF/AICR总分在12周和24周时显著提高(p's结论:参与mHealth MVPA干预可能会影响BCS的癌症风险,并对某些非目标行为(水果和蔬菜消费)产生影响,但对其他危险因素(含糖饮料、快餐、体重指数、酒精消费)没有影响。未来的工作应该探索如何最大限度地发挥这些作用,并确定资源高效的饮食干预成分是否能改善癌症预后。影响:了解移动健康MVPA干预对非目标饮食行为的影响,可以指导针对生活方式行为的可扩展干预措施的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信