Changes in afterload and contractility in patients with severe aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf063
Kristian B Laursen, Rasmus Carter-Storch, Patricia A Pellikka, Mulham Ali, Nils S B Mogensen, Kristian A Øvrehus, Marie-Annick Clavel, Jordi S Dahl
{"title":"Changes in afterload and contractility in patients with severe aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Kristian B Laursen, Rasmus Carter-Storch, Patricia A Pellikka, Mulham Ali, Nils S B Mogensen, Kristian A Øvrehus, Marie-Annick Clavel, Jordi S Dahl","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In aortic stenosis (AS), estimation of left ventricular (LV) contractility is difficult as most markers of systolic LV function are load-dependent. The ratio of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) to end-systolic wall stress (ESWS), has been widely accepted as a marker of contractility. However, no studies have evaluated if this ratio is affected by loading conditions. The study describes changes in ESWS and ESWS corrected LVEF after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this prospective study, 41 patients with severe AS underwent echocardiography, LV catheterisation, and computed tomography (CT) before and immediately after TAVR. ESWS was estimated from echocardiography alone (ESWS<sub>Echo</sub>), combining CT LV dimensions and echocardiographic gradients (ESWS<sub>CT</sub>  <sub>+</sub>  <sub>echo</sub>) and combining CT LV dimensions and invasively measured LV end-systolic pressure (ESWS<sub>CT</sub>  <sub>+</sub>  <sub>Invasive</sub>). ESWS<sub>echo</sub>, ESWS<sub>CT</sub>  <sub>+</sub>  <sub>echo</sub> and ESWS<sub>CT</sub>  <sub>+</sub>  <sub>Invasive</sub> all decreased significantly after TAVR (89 ± 48 vs. 57 ± 37 Kdynes/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> < 0.01; 69 ± 8 vs. 51 ± 8 Kdynes/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> < 0.01, and 197 ± 69 vs. 137 ± 48 Kpa/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> < 0.01, respectively). We observed weak to moderate associations between the methods. After TAVR, LVEF corrected to ESWS<sub>echo</sub>, ESWS<sub>CT</sub>  <sub>+</sub>  <sub>echo</sub> and ESWS<sub>CT</sub>  <sub>+</sub>  <sub>Invasive</sub> increased (0.93 ± 0.07 vs. 1.91 ± 2.1, <i>P</i> = 0.013; 0.36 ± 0.19 vs. 0.58 ± 0.33, <i>P</i> < 0.01, and 0.3 ± 0.02 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5, <i>P</i> < 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESWS<sub>echo</sub>, ESWS<sub>CT</sub>  <sub>+</sub>  <sub>echo</sub> and ESWS<sub>CT</sub>  <sub>+</sub>  <sub>Invasive</sub> decreased significantly after TAVR suggesting they reflect afterload, but independent of method, ESWS corrected LVEF increased slightly post-TAVR, indicating load dependency.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"3 1","pages":"qyaf063"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In aortic stenosis (AS), estimation of left ventricular (LV) contractility is difficult as most markers of systolic LV function are load-dependent. The ratio of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) to end-systolic wall stress (ESWS), has been widely accepted as a marker of contractility. However, no studies have evaluated if this ratio is affected by loading conditions. The study describes changes in ESWS and ESWS corrected LVEF after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Methods and results: In this prospective study, 41 patients with severe AS underwent echocardiography, LV catheterisation, and computed tomography (CT) before and immediately after TAVR. ESWS was estimated from echocardiography alone (ESWSEcho), combining CT LV dimensions and echocardiographic gradients (ESWSCT  +  echo) and combining CT LV dimensions and invasively measured LV end-systolic pressure (ESWSCT  +  Invasive). ESWSecho, ESWSCT  +  echo and ESWSCT  +  Invasive all decreased significantly after TAVR (89 ± 48 vs. 57 ± 37 Kdynes/cm2, P < 0.01; 69 ± 8 vs. 51 ± 8 Kdynes/cm2, P < 0.01, and 197 ± 69 vs. 137 ± 48 Kpa/cm2, P < 0.01, respectively). We observed weak to moderate associations between the methods. After TAVR, LVEF corrected to ESWSecho, ESWSCT  +  echo and ESWSCT  +  Invasive increased (0.93 ± 0.07 vs. 1.91 ± 2.1, P = 0.013; 0.36 ± 0.19 vs. 0.58 ± 0.33, P < 0.01, and 0.3 ± 0.02 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5, P < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusion: ESWSecho, ESWSCT  +  echo and ESWSCT  +  Invasive decreased significantly after TAVR suggesting they reflect afterload, but independent of method, ESWS corrected LVEF increased slightly post-TAVR, indicating load dependency.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者后负荷和收缩力的变化。
目的:在主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)中,左室(LV)收缩性的估计是困难的,因为大多数收缩性左室功能的标志是负荷依赖的。左室射血分数(LVEF)与收缩末期壁应力(ESWS)之比已被广泛接受为收缩性的标志。然而,没有研究评估这一比率是否受到加载条件的影响。该研究描述了经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后ESWS和ESWS校正的LVEF的变化。方法和结果:在这项前瞻性研究中,41例严重AS患者在TAVR之前和之后立即进行了超声心动图,左室插管和计算机断层扫描(CT)。ESWS仅通过超声心动图(ESWSEcho),结合CT左室尺寸和超声心动图梯度(ESWSCT + echo),结合CT左室尺寸和有创测量左室收缩压(ESWSCT +有创)来估计。TAVR术后eswscho、ESWSCT +回声和ESWSCT +侵袭均显著降低(89±48比57±37 Kdynes/cm2, P < 0.01;69±8比51±8 Kdynes/cm2, P < 0.01; 197±69比137±48 Kpa/cm2, P < 0.01)。我们观察到这些方法之间存在弱到中度的关联。经TAVR后,LVEF校正为ESWSecho、ESWSCT +回声、ESWSCT +侵袭性增高(0.93±0.07∶1.91±2.1,P = 0.013;0.36±0.19 vs. 0.58±0.33,P < 0.01; 0.3±0.02 vs. 2.5±1.5,P < 0.01)。结论:TAVR后ESWSecho、ESWSCT + echo和ESWSCT + Invasive均显著降低,提示其反映了后负荷,但与方法无关,ESWS校正后LVEF在TAVR后略有升高,提示负荷依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信