Exploring the role of flow cytometry to assess endothelial cells in human sepsis: A systematic review.

M Bardají-Carrillo, M Martín-Fernández, A García-Concejo, Á Tamayo-Velasco, D Bernardo, E Tamayo
{"title":"Exploring the role of flow cytometry to assess endothelial cells in human sepsis: A systematic review.","authors":"M Bardají-Carrillo, M Martín-Fernández, A García-Concejo, Á Tamayo-Velasco, D Bernardo, E Tamayo","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2025.501850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the key role of the endothelium in organ failure secondary to sepsis, we reviewed the available literature on the use of flow cytometry (FC) to analyse endothelial cells in human sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science from inception until November 2024 to identify original research articles describing the use of FC to study human endothelial cells in sepsis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 395 original articles were found; 36 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studied circulating mature (CEC) or progenitor (CEPC) endothelial cells. High CEC and/or CEPC counts correlated with higher mortality; CEC numbers were increased even before the onset of shock. Twenty-six manuscripts studied the phenotype of different human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC), and showed that expression of adhesion molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin were increased in sepsis, but there was no evidence of their association with severity or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High CEC and CEPC counts correlate with sepsis severity and mortality, confirming that their assessment by FC can shed some light on early sepsis diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":" ","pages":"501850"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2025.501850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Given the key role of the endothelium in organ failure secondary to sepsis, we reviewed the available literature on the use of flow cytometry (FC) to analyse endothelial cells in human sepsis.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science from inception until November 2024 to identify original research articles describing the use of FC to study human endothelial cells in sepsis.

Results: A total of 395 original articles were found; 36 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studied circulating mature (CEC) or progenitor (CEPC) endothelial cells. High CEC and/or CEPC counts correlated with higher mortality; CEC numbers were increased even before the onset of shock. Twenty-six manuscripts studied the phenotype of different human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC), and showed that expression of adhesion molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin were increased in sepsis, but there was no evidence of their association with severity or mortality.

Conclusion: High CEC and CEPC counts correlate with sepsis severity and mortality, confirming that their assessment by FC can shed some light on early sepsis diagnosis.

探索流式细胞术在人类败血症中评估内皮细胞的作用:一项系统综述。
鉴于内皮在脓毒症继发器官衰竭中的关键作用,我们回顾了利用流式细胞术(FC)分析人类脓毒症中内皮细胞的现有文献。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed和Web of Science从成立到2024年11月,以确定描述使用FC研究脓毒症中的人内皮细胞的原始研究文章。结果:共发现原创文章395篇;36例符合纳入标准。10个研究循环成熟(CEC)或祖(CEPC)内皮细胞。高CEC和/或CEPC计数与高死亡率相关;甚至在休克开始前CEC数就增加了。26篇文献研究了不同人微血管内皮细胞(HMEC)的表型,结果显示黏附分子ICAM-1、VCAM-1和e -选择素在脓毒症中表达增加,但没有证据表明它们与严重程度或死亡率相关。结论:高CEC和高CEPC计数与脓毒症的严重程度和死亡率相关,证实了FC对它们的评估有助于脓毒症的早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信