Evaluation of virtual solution-focused coaching-peds (SFC-peds) with youth with neuromuscular conditions: a randomized trial of delivery intensities.

IF 1.7

Developmental neurorehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-08 DOI:10.1080/17518423.2025.2515357

Kate Hull, Christina Ippolito, Dayna Frydman, Amy C McPherson, Laura McAdam

{"title":"Evaluation of virtual solution-focused coaching-peds (SFC-peds) with youth with neuromuscular conditions: a randomized trial of delivery intensities.","authors":"Kate Hull, Christina Ippolito, Dayna Frydman, Amy C McPherson, Laura McAdam","doi":"10.1080/17518423.2025.2515357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The optimal number of sessions for pediatric solution-focused coaching (SFC-peds) is unknown.Objective: Compare delivery intensities of a virtual-based SCF-peds with youth with neuromuscular conditions.Methods: The study was an explanatory sequential, assessor-blinded randomized trial comparing single session and intensive (five sessions) coaching intensities. Goal attainment was measured using COPM and GAS. Pre-post COPM and GAS scores were compared. Participants completed semi-structured interviews.Results: Fourteen participants (single: n = 5; intensive: n = 9) completed the study. Both groups achieved improvements in COPM performance (single: p = .01; intensive: p = .01) and satisfaction (single: p = .02; intensive: p = .01). No differences were observed between groups for COPM (performance: p = .75; satisfaction: p = .50) or GAS (p = .68).Conclusions: Youth with neuromuscular conditions identified and achieved personally meaningful goals with SFC-peds, regardless of the number of coaching sessions. SFC-peds can be personalized.","PeriodicalId":93976,"journal":{"name":"Developmental neurorehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2025.2515357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal number of sessions for pediatric solution-focused coaching (SFC-peds) is unknown.

Objective: Compare delivery intensities of a virtual-based SCF-peds with youth with neuromuscular conditions.

Methods: The study was an explanatory sequential, assessor-blinded randomized trial comparing single session and intensive (five sessions) coaching intensities. Goal attainment was measured using COPM and GAS. Pre-post COPM and GAS scores were compared. Participants completed semi-structured interviews.

Results: Fourteen participants (single: n = 5; intensive: n = 9) completed the study. Both groups achieved improvements in COPM performance (single: p = .01; intensive: p = .01) and satisfaction (single: p = .02; intensive: p = .01). No differences were observed between groups for COPM (performance: p = .75; satisfaction: p = .50) or GAS (p = .68).

Conclusions: Youth with neuromuscular conditions identified and achieved personally meaningful goals with SFC-peds, regardless of the number of coaching sessions. SFC-peds can be personalized.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估以虚拟解决方案为中心的训练儿科（sfc -儿科）与患有神经肌肉疾病的青少年：一项随机试验的交付强度。

背景：以儿科解决方案为重点的指导（SFC-peds）的最佳课时数尚不清楚。目的：比较基于虚拟的SCF-peds与神经肌肉疾病的青少年的输送强度。方法：该研究是一项解释性顺序、评估者盲法随机试验，比较单次训练和强化（5次）训练强度。使用COPM和GAS测量目标实现情况。比较COPM前后和GAS评分。参与者完成了半结构化的访谈。结果：14名受试者(单身：n = 5；强化：n = 9)完成研究。两组的COPM性能均有改善(单组：p = 0.01；强化：p = 0.01)和满意度(单一：p = 0.02；强化：p = 0.01)。各组间COPM无显著差异(性能：p = 0.75；满意度：p = 0.50)或GAS （p = 0.68）。结论：患有神经肌肉疾病的青少年在SFC-peds中确定并实现了个人有意义的目标，与教练课程的数量无关。sfc -ped可以个性化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Developmental neurorehabilitation

自引率

0.00%

发文量