An overview of the recent trials of corticosteroids for severe community-acquired pneumonia.

IF 2.7
Expert review of respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-08 DOI:10.1080/17476348.2025.2513518
Benjamin Edland, Grant W Waterer
{"title":"An overview of the recent trials of corticosteroids for severe community-acquired pneumonia.","authors":"Benjamin Edland, Grant W Waterer","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2025.2513518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of corticosteroids in the setting of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Here, we review the evidence for and against corticosteroids in the setting of CAP with a particular focus on three recent randomized, placebo-controlled trials that have disparate results but significantly advance our knowledge in the field.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Current published data does not support widespread use of corticosteroids in CAP, with evidence this is more likely to cause harm than benefit. The use of hydrocortisone in a limited number of patients with respiratory failure of less than 24 h duration and a serum c-reactive protein > 200 mg/L may be supportable if a high dependency setting is available to address hyperglycemia. Disparate results and polarized positions among experts in the field will only be resolved by studies with tighter entry criteria, better definition of target groups, consideration of the infecting pathogen and therapeutic window for benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"925-933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2025.2513518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of corticosteroids in the setting of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains controversial.

Areas covered: Here, we review the evidence for and against corticosteroids in the setting of CAP with a particular focus on three recent randomized, placebo-controlled trials that have disparate results but significantly advance our knowledge in the field.

Expert opinion: Current published data does not support widespread use of corticosteroids in CAP, with evidence this is more likely to cause harm than benefit. The use of hydrocortisone in a limited number of patients with respiratory failure of less than 24 h duration and a serum c-reactive protein > 200 mg/L may be supportable if a high dependency setting is available to address hyperglycemia. Disparate results and polarized positions among experts in the field will only be resolved by studies with tighter entry criteria, better definition of target groups, consideration of the infecting pathogen and therapeutic window for benefit.

最近皮质类固醇治疗严重社区获得性肺炎的试验综述。
在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的情况下使用皮质类固醇仍然存在争议。涵盖的领域:在此,我们回顾了在CAP背景下支持和反对皮质类固醇的证据,特别关注最近的三个随机、安慰剂对照试验,这些试验的结果不同,但显著提高了我们在该领域的知识。专家意见:目前公布的数据不支持在CAP中广泛使用皮质类固醇,有证据表明这可能弊大于利。在少数持续时间少于24小时且血清c反应蛋白水平低于200 mg/L的呼吸衰竭患者中使用氢化可的松可能是可行的,如果有高依赖性设置可用于治疗高血糖。只有通过更严格的进入标准、更好地定义目标群体、考虑感染病原体和获益治疗窗口的研究,才能解决该领域专家之间不同的结果和两极分化的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信