Prevalence and Impact of Traumatic Life Events among Black and White Family Members of ICU Patients.

Deepshikha Charan Ashana, Joanna Hart, Kimberly S Johnson, Ernestine C Briggs, Alice Parish, Maren K Olsen, Jennie Jaggers, Greer Tiver, Amy Summer, Deepa Ramadurai, Nicholas Madamidola, Bassam Syed, Carrie Purbeck Trunzo, Katherine Ramos, Muhammed S Bah, Christopher E Cox
{"title":"Prevalence and Impact of Traumatic Life Events among Black and White Family Members of ICU Patients.","authors":"Deepshikha Charan Ashana, Joanna Hart, Kimberly S Johnson, Ernestine C Briggs, Alice Parish, Maren K Olsen, Jennie Jaggers, Greer Tiver, Amy Summer, Deepa Ramadurai, Nicholas Madamidola, Bassam Syed, Carrie Purbeck Trunzo, Katherine Ramos, Muhammed S Bah, Christopher E Cox","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1157OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Lifetime trauma is common and may affect interactions with the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the prevalence of lifetime trauma and its association with family-clinician interpersonal outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study conducted in nine ICUs in one urban and one suburban-rural health system. Participants were Black or White surrogate decision-makers for mechanically ventilated patients. Independent variables were the number of lifetime traumatic events measured using the Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R), and secondarily and separately, discrimination-related traumatic stress symptoms. The primary outcome was family-reported conflict with ICU clinicians about treatment decisions. Secondary outcomes were family-reported quality of clinician communication and therapeutic alliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 141 family members (median age 52.7 years [IQR 41.9, 62.0]; female n=100, 70.9%; White n=85, 60.3%; Black n=56, 39.7%), the median number of lifetime traumatic events was 6.0 (IQR 4.0, 9.0). Lifetime trauma was significantly but non-linearly associated with family-clinician conflict (OR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.09,1.90 for LSC-R values 0-7.5; OR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.02 for LSC-R values 7.5-16; p=0.03). Discrimination-related stress symptoms were also associated with conflict (OR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.003, 1.07; p=0.03). Interactions between the independent variables and family member race were not significant, suggesting the effects of lifetime trauma and discrimination-related traumatic stress on family-clinician conflict were similar for Black and White caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lifetime trauma is common among families of critically ill patients and is associated with negative experiences of critical care. Trauma-informed care may reduce family-clinician conflict and improve other measures of family experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202411-1157OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Lifetime trauma is common and may affect interactions with the healthcare system.

Objective: To measure the prevalence of lifetime trauma and its association with family-clinician interpersonal outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in nine ICUs in one urban and one suburban-rural health system. Participants were Black or White surrogate decision-makers for mechanically ventilated patients. Independent variables were the number of lifetime traumatic events measured using the Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R), and secondarily and separately, discrimination-related traumatic stress symptoms. The primary outcome was family-reported conflict with ICU clinicians about treatment decisions. Secondary outcomes were family-reported quality of clinician communication and therapeutic alliance.

Results: Among 141 family members (median age 52.7 years [IQR 41.9, 62.0]; female n=100, 70.9%; White n=85, 60.3%; Black n=56, 39.7%), the median number of lifetime traumatic events was 6.0 (IQR 4.0, 9.0). Lifetime trauma was significantly but non-linearly associated with family-clinician conflict (OR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.09,1.90 for LSC-R values 0-7.5; OR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.02 for LSC-R values 7.5-16; p=0.03). Discrimination-related stress symptoms were also associated with conflict (OR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.003, 1.07; p=0.03). Interactions between the independent variables and family member race were not significant, suggesting the effects of lifetime trauma and discrimination-related traumatic stress on family-clinician conflict were similar for Black and White caregivers.

Conclusions: Lifetime trauma is common among families of critically ill patients and is associated with negative experiences of critical care. Trauma-informed care may reduce family-clinician conflict and improve other measures of family experience.

ICU患者黑人和白人家庭成员创伤性生活事件的发生率及其影响。
理由:终身创伤是常见的,并可能影响与卫生保健系统的相互作用。目的:了解重症监护病房(ICU)患者终身创伤的发生率及其与家庭-临床医师人际关系的关系。方法:对1个城市和1个郊区卫生系统的9个icu进行横断面研究。参与者为机械通气患者的黑人或白人代理决策者。独立变量是使用修订后的生活压力源检查表(LSC-R)测量的一生创伤事件的数量,其次是与歧视相关的创伤压力症状。主要结局是家庭报告的与ICU临床医生关于治疗决定的冲突。次要结果是家庭报告的临床医生沟通质量和治疗联盟。结果:141名家庭成员(中位年龄52.7岁[IQR 41.9, 62.0];女性n=100,占70.9%;白色n=85, 60.3%;黑n=56, 39.7%),一生创伤事件中位数为6.0 (IQR为4.0,9.0)。终生创伤与家庭-临床冲突显著但非线性相关(LSC-R值为0-7.5时,OR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.09,1.90;OR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.02, LSC-R值为7.5 ~ 16;p = 0.03)。歧视相关的应激症状也与冲突相关(OR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.003, 1.07;p = 0.03)。自变量与家庭成员种族之间的相互作用不显著,表明终身创伤和歧视相关的创伤应激对家庭-临床医生冲突的影响在黑人和白人照顾者中相似。结论:终身创伤在危重患者家庭中很常见,并与危重护理的负面经历有关。创伤知情护理可以减少家庭与临床医生的冲突,并改善家庭经验的其他措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信