Perspectives on data analytics for gaining a competitive advantage in football: harnessing data for decision support.

IF 3.5
Anne Hecksteden, Matthias Kempe, Julian Berger
{"title":"Perspectives on data analytics for gaining a competitive advantage in football: harnessing data for decision support.","authors":"Anne Hecksteden, Matthias Kempe, Julian Berger","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2025.2517056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this issue, Olthof and Davis highlight the potential of computational methods for gaining a competitive advantage in football and call for a closer collaboration between football and data science experts to fully leverage these opportunities. While we agree in principle with both aspects, we would like to amend some considerations that may contribute nuances to this perspective.Sustained success in a competitive environment results from a stream of good, well-informed decisions. Computational methods may support decision making in football by alleviating information overload, time constraints, unintended variation, and human biases. The advantages for data management and automated feature extraction are beyond doubt. However, as also emphasized by Olthof and Davis, the critical part of decision making is a prediction task: Forecasting the potential outcome of the available options and choosing between options based on limited amounts of information. Over the last two decades, the use of large amounts of data for the construction of sophisticated metrics and predictive models has gained widespread use in elite football. However, high-dimensional, data-driven algorithms don't necessarily provide the most accurate and helpful predictions. Rather, deliberately sparse, interpretable models that leverage data-driven modelling as well as domain expertise have repeatedly shown to have competitive predictive performance while at the same time avoiding the downsides of black-box algorithms for decision support. We illustrate this 'less-can-be-more' effect with two worked examples based on real-world data. Finally, predictability of an outcome can be low even in principle, putting hard limits to predictive accuracy regardless of modelling strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2025.2517056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this issue, Olthof and Davis highlight the potential of computational methods for gaining a competitive advantage in football and call for a closer collaboration between football and data science experts to fully leverage these opportunities. While we agree in principle with both aspects, we would like to amend some considerations that may contribute nuances to this perspective.Sustained success in a competitive environment results from a stream of good, well-informed decisions. Computational methods may support decision making in football by alleviating information overload, time constraints, unintended variation, and human biases. The advantages for data management and automated feature extraction are beyond doubt. However, as also emphasized by Olthof and Davis, the critical part of decision making is a prediction task: Forecasting the potential outcome of the available options and choosing between options based on limited amounts of information. Over the last two decades, the use of large amounts of data for the construction of sophisticated metrics and predictive models has gained widespread use in elite football. However, high-dimensional, data-driven algorithms don't necessarily provide the most accurate and helpful predictions. Rather, deliberately sparse, interpretable models that leverage data-driven modelling as well as domain expertise have repeatedly shown to have competitive predictive performance while at the same time avoiding the downsides of black-box algorithms for decision support. We illustrate this 'less-can-be-more' effect with two worked examples based on real-world data. Finally, predictability of an outcome can be low even in principle, putting hard limits to predictive accuracy regardless of modelling strategy.

获得足球竞争优势的数据分析视角:利用数据支持决策。
在本期中,Olthof和Davis强调了计算方法在足球比赛中获得竞争优势的潜力,并呼吁足球和数据科学专家之间进行更密切的合作,以充分利用这些机会。虽然我们原则上同意这两个方面,但我们要修正一些可能对这一观点产生细微差别的考虑。在竞争环境中持续的成功源于一系列明智的决策。计算方法可以通过减轻信息过载、时间限制、意外变化和人类偏见来支持足球决策。数据管理和自动特征提取的优势是毋庸置疑的。然而,正如Olthof和Davis所强调的那样,决策的关键部分是预测任务:预测可用选项的潜在结果,并根据有限的信息在选项之间做出选择。在过去的二十年里,使用大量数据来构建复杂的指标和预测模型已经在精英足球中得到了广泛的应用。然而,高维、数据驱动的算法不一定能提供最准确和最有用的预测。相反,利用数据驱动建模和领域专业知识的故意稀疏、可解释的模型一再显示出具有竞争力的预测性能,同时避免了决策支持的黑箱算法的缺点。我们用两个基于真实世界数据的工作示例来说明这种“少即是多”的效应。最后,即使在原则上,结果的可预测性也可能很低,无论采用何种建模策略,都对预测的准确性施加了严格的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信