How does policy modelling work in practice? A global analysis on the use of epidemiological modelling in health crises.

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004675
Liza Hadley, Caylyn Rich, Alex Tasker, Olivier Restif, Sebastian Funk
{"title":"How does policy modelling work in practice? A global analysis on the use of epidemiological modelling in health crises.","authors":"Liza Hadley, Caylyn Rich, Alex Tasker, Olivier Restif, Sebastian Funk","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the use and translation of epidemiological modelling by policy and decision makers in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. Prior to COVID-19, there was little readiness for global health systems, and many science-policy networks were assembled ad-hoc. Moreover, in the field of epidemiological modelling, one with significant sudden influence, there is still no international guidance or standard of practice on how modelled evidence should guide policy during major health crises. Here we use a multi-country case study on the use of epidemiological modelling in emergency COVID-19 response, to examine the effective integration of crisis science and policy in different countries. We investigated COVID-19 modelling-policy systems and practices in 13 countries, spanning all six UN geographic regions. Data collection took the form of expert interviews with a range of national policy/ decision makers, scientific advisors, and modellers. We examined the current use of epidemiological modelling, introduced a classification framework for outbreak modelling and policy on which best practice can be structured, and provided preliminary recommendations for future practice. Full analysis and interpretation of the breadth of interview responses is presented, providing evidence for the current and future use of modelling in disease outbreaks. We found that interviewees in countries with a similar size and type of modelling infrastructure, and similar level of government interaction with modelling reported similar experiences and recommendations on using modelling in outbreak response. From this, we introduced a helpful grouping of country experience upon which a tailored future best practice could be structured. We concluded the article by outlining context-specific activities that modellers and policy actors could consider implementing in their own countries. This article serves as a first evidence base for the current use of modelling in a recent major health crisis and provides a robust framework for developing epidemiological modelling-to-policy best practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 6","pages":"e0004675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the use and translation of epidemiological modelling by policy and decision makers in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. Prior to COVID-19, there was little readiness for global health systems, and many science-policy networks were assembled ad-hoc. Moreover, in the field of epidemiological modelling, one with significant sudden influence, there is still no international guidance or standard of practice on how modelled evidence should guide policy during major health crises. Here we use a multi-country case study on the use of epidemiological modelling in emergency COVID-19 response, to examine the effective integration of crisis science and policy in different countries. We investigated COVID-19 modelling-policy systems and practices in 13 countries, spanning all six UN geographic regions. Data collection took the form of expert interviews with a range of national policy/ decision makers, scientific advisors, and modellers. We examined the current use of epidemiological modelling, introduced a classification framework for outbreak modelling and policy on which best practice can be structured, and provided preliminary recommendations for future practice. Full analysis and interpretation of the breadth of interview responses is presented, providing evidence for the current and future use of modelling in disease outbreaks. We found that interviewees in countries with a similar size and type of modelling infrastructure, and similar level of government interaction with modelling reported similar experiences and recommendations on using modelling in outbreak response. From this, we introduced a helpful grouping of country experience upon which a tailored future best practice could be structured. We concluded the article by outlining context-specific activities that modellers and policy actors could consider implementing in their own countries. This article serves as a first evidence base for the current use of modelling in a recent major health crisis and provides a robust framework for developing epidemiological modelling-to-policy best practice.

政策模型在实践中如何发挥作用?关于在健康危机中使用流行病学模型的全球分析。
本研究考察了政策和决策者在应对COVID-19疫情时对流行病学模型的使用和翻译。在2019冠状病毒病之前,全球卫生系统几乎没有做好准备,许多科学政策网络都是临时组建的。此外,在具有重大突然影响的流行病学建模领域,仍然没有关于模拟证据如何在重大卫生危机期间指导政策的国际指导或实践标准。在这里,我们使用了一个关于在COVID-19紧急应对中使用流行病学模型的多国案例研究,以检验不同国家危机科学与政策的有效整合。我们调查了涵盖联合国所有六个地理区域的13个国家的COVID-19建模政策体系和实践。数据收集采用了与一系列国家政策/决策者、科学顾问和建模者进行专家访谈的形式。我们审查了流行病学建模的当前使用情况,介绍了疫情建模的分类框架和可据此构建最佳实践的政策,并为未来的实践提供了初步建议。对访谈回答的广度进行了全面分析和解释,为目前和未来在疾病暴发中使用模型提供了证据。我们发现,在建模基础设施规模和类型相似、政府与建模互动程度相似的国家,受访者报告了在疫情应对中使用建模的类似经验和建议。据此,我们介绍了一组有益的国家经验,在此基础上可以构建量身定制的未来最佳做法。最后,我们概述了建模者和政策参与者可以考虑在本国实施的特定于具体情况的活动。本文是目前在最近一次重大卫生危机中使用模型的第一个证据基础,并为制定从流行病学模型到政策的最佳做法提供了一个强有力的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信