Cofactors of earlier uptake of modern postpartum family planning methods in Kenya.

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004353
Nancy M Ngumbau, Damaris Kimonge, Julia C Dettinger, Felix Abuna, Ben Odhiambo, Laurén Gómez, Anjuli D Wagner, Mary M Marwa, Salphine Watoyi, Emmaculate Nzove, Jillian Pintye, Jared M Baeten, John Kinuthia, Grace John-Stewart, Cyrus Mugo
{"title":"Cofactors of earlier uptake of modern postpartum family planning methods in Kenya.","authors":"Nancy M Ngumbau, Damaris Kimonge, Julia C Dettinger, Felix Abuna, Ben Odhiambo, Laurén Gómez, Anjuli D Wagner, Mary M Marwa, Salphine Watoyi, Emmaculate Nzove, Jillian Pintye, Jared M Baeten, John Kinuthia, Grace John-Stewart, Cyrus Mugo","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are limited data on uptake of postpartum family planning (FP), particularly in high HIV prevalence settings. We assessed the timing of modern postpartum FP initiation and the cofactors of earlier uptake using longitudinal data from a clinical trial conducted in Kenya to assess two models of PrEP delivery among pregnant and postpartum women (NCT#03070600). Time to uptake of modern postpartum FP was estimated using survival analysis methods, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine cofactors of earlier uptake of modern postpartum FP. Among 4,191 women, median age was 24 years, 17% were aged 15-19 years, 88% were in a steady relationship, 50% intended to be pregnant and 75% were multigravida. The median time to resumption of sex was 8 weeks postpartum versus 24 weeks for uptake of postpartum FP. At 6 weeks postpartum, 42% of women had resumed sex, versus 12% who took up FP; at 14 weeks, 79% versus 38%; at 6 months, 88% versus 59%; and at 9 months, 91% versus 80%, respectively. Injectables and implants were the most common FP methods. Approximately 3.3% of all women became pregnant during the 9-month postpartum period. Being older and having ≤4children was associated with earlier uptake of modern postpartum FP. Women with lower education, primigravida, low social support, history of miscarriage/stillbirth, without a partner at enrolment, not residing with their partners, not receiving financial support from their partner and whose youngest child at enrolment was < 2years had later uptake of postpartum FP. Women who were ambivalent about their immediate previous pregnancy took up postpartum FP later than those who intended to be pregnant. Our findings underscore the importance of addressing the individual, interpersonal, social and obstetric factors associated with timeliness of postpartum FP uptake during the development and delivery of postpartum FP interventions, particularly in high HIV prevalence settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 6","pages":"e0004353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are limited data on uptake of postpartum family planning (FP), particularly in high HIV prevalence settings. We assessed the timing of modern postpartum FP initiation and the cofactors of earlier uptake using longitudinal data from a clinical trial conducted in Kenya to assess two models of PrEP delivery among pregnant and postpartum women (NCT#03070600). Time to uptake of modern postpartum FP was estimated using survival analysis methods, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine cofactors of earlier uptake of modern postpartum FP. Among 4,191 women, median age was 24 years, 17% were aged 15-19 years, 88% were in a steady relationship, 50% intended to be pregnant and 75% were multigravida. The median time to resumption of sex was 8 weeks postpartum versus 24 weeks for uptake of postpartum FP. At 6 weeks postpartum, 42% of women had resumed sex, versus 12% who took up FP; at 14 weeks, 79% versus 38%; at 6 months, 88% versus 59%; and at 9 months, 91% versus 80%, respectively. Injectables and implants were the most common FP methods. Approximately 3.3% of all women became pregnant during the 9-month postpartum period. Being older and having ≤4children was associated with earlier uptake of modern postpartum FP. Women with lower education, primigravida, low social support, history of miscarriage/stillbirth, without a partner at enrolment, not residing with their partners, not receiving financial support from their partner and whose youngest child at enrolment was < 2years had later uptake of postpartum FP. Women who were ambivalent about their immediate previous pregnancy took up postpartum FP later than those who intended to be pregnant. Our findings underscore the importance of addressing the individual, interpersonal, social and obstetric factors associated with timeliness of postpartum FP uptake during the development and delivery of postpartum FP interventions, particularly in high HIV prevalence settings.

肯尼亚早期采用现代产后计划生育方法的辅助因素。
关于产后计划生育(FP)的数据有限,特别是在艾滋病毒高流行环境中。我们利用肯尼亚进行的一项临床试验(NCT#03070600)的纵向数据评估了现代产后计划生育启动的时间和早期接受计划生育的辅助因素,该试验评估了孕妇和产后妇女的两种PrEP分娩模式。采用生存分析方法估计现代产后计划生育的摄取时间,并采用Cox比例风险模型确定早期摄取现代产后计划生育的辅助因素。在4191名女性中,中位年龄为24岁,17%年龄在15-19岁之间,88%处于稳定关系中,50%计划怀孕,75%为多胎妊娠。恢复性生活的中位时间为产后8周,而服用产后生育激素的中位时间为24周。产后6周,42%的女性恢复了性生活,12%的女性采取了计划生育;14周时,79%对38%;6个月时,分别为88%和59%;9个月时,分别是91%和80%注射和植入是最常见的FP方法。大约3.3%的妇女在产后9个月期间怀孕。年龄越大,生育≤4个孩子与较早接受现代产后计划生育有关。受教育程度较低、初产妇、社会支持低、流产/死产史、登记时没有伴侣、没有与伴侣住在一起、没有获得伴侣的经济支持、登记时最小的孩子是女性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信