Clusters and case vignettes of impaired maternal-fetal bonding in pregnancy: A mixed method approach.

PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1002/pcn5.70127
Toshinori Kitamura, Ayako Hada, Yuriko Usui, Yukiko Ohashi
{"title":"Clusters and case vignettes of impaired maternal-fetal bonding in pregnancy: A mixed method approach.","authors":"Toshinori Kitamura, Ayako Hada, Yuriko Usui, Yukiko Ohashi","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Clinical attention to and understanding of women with impaired fetal bonding is important for early therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of women belonging to groups derived by cluster analysis of impaired maternal-fetal bonding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method approach was adopted. We conducted a two-wave internet survey targeting pregnant women less than 36 gestational weeks by using a questionnaire (33-item Dimensional Assessment of Mother Baby Organization Questionnaire [DAMBO Q33]) with subsequent online interviews (Dimensional Assessment of Mother and Baby Organization-Research Version). The maternal-fetal bonding disorder items in the DAMBO Q33 were entered into a two-step cluster analysis. Two representative cases from each of the clusters, except for the positive bonding cluster, were selected to describe their clinical pictures. Finally, quantitative data and qualitative data were integrated and interpreted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-step cluster analysis elicited four clusters: bonding disorder (<i>n</i> = 101), ambivalent bonding (<i>n</i> = 156), positive bonding (<i>n</i> = 173), and lack of bonding emotions (<i>n</i> = 122). Women in the bonding disorder cluster were characterized by seriously negative feelings towards the fetus. Women in the ambivalent bonding cluster wished to be pregnant but were not sufficiently ready for the transition into parenthood. Women in the lack of bonding emotions cluster were characterized by a lack of strong interest in pregnancy and the fetus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patterns of impaired maternal-fetal bonding were identified. We should not think of a pathological category of mental illness among them but recognize that such parents are targets for professional assessments and supportive (therapeutic) interventions. Understanding the meaning of getting pregnant and difficulties in the process of maternal role attainment is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"4 2","pages":"e70127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Clinical attention to and understanding of women with impaired fetal bonding is important for early therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of women belonging to groups derived by cluster analysis of impaired maternal-fetal bonding.

Methods: A mixed-method approach was adopted. We conducted a two-wave internet survey targeting pregnant women less than 36 gestational weeks by using a questionnaire (33-item Dimensional Assessment of Mother Baby Organization Questionnaire [DAMBO Q33]) with subsequent online interviews (Dimensional Assessment of Mother and Baby Organization-Research Version). The maternal-fetal bonding disorder items in the DAMBO Q33 were entered into a two-step cluster analysis. Two representative cases from each of the clusters, except for the positive bonding cluster, were selected to describe their clinical pictures. Finally, quantitative data and qualitative data were integrated and interpreted.

Results: A two-step cluster analysis elicited four clusters: bonding disorder (n = 101), ambivalent bonding (n = 156), positive bonding (n = 173), and lack of bonding emotions (n = 122). Women in the bonding disorder cluster were characterized by seriously negative feelings towards the fetus. Women in the ambivalent bonding cluster wished to be pregnant but were not sufficiently ready for the transition into parenthood. Women in the lack of bonding emotions cluster were characterized by a lack of strong interest in pregnancy and the fetus.

Conclusion: Patterns of impaired maternal-fetal bonding were identified. We should not think of a pathological category of mental illness among them but recognize that such parents are targets for professional assessments and supportive (therapeutic) interventions. Understanding the meaning of getting pregnant and difficulties in the process of maternal role attainment is required.

集群和案例插曲受损的母胎结合在怀孕:一个混合的方法方法。
目的:临床对胎儿结合障碍妇女的关注和认识对早期干预治疗具有重要意义。本研究旨在阐明由母胎结合受损的聚类分析得出的妇女的临床特征。方法:采用混合方法。我们采用问卷(《母婴组织维度评估问卷》[DAMBO Q33])和随后的在线访谈(《母婴组织维度评估-研究版》),对孕周未满36周的孕妇进行了两波网络调查。将DAMBO Q33中母胎结合障碍项目纳入两步聚类分析。除正键簇外,每个簇中选择两个代表性病例描述其临床表现。最后,对定量数据和定性数据进行整合和解释。结果:两步聚类分析得出四个聚类:结合障碍(n = 101)、矛盾结合(n = 156)、积极结合(n = 173)和缺乏结合情绪(n = 122)。结合障碍组的女性对胎儿有严重的负面情绪。处于矛盾关系组的女性希望怀孕,但还没有为转变为父母做好充分的准备。缺乏情感联系的女性对怀孕和胎儿缺乏强烈的兴趣。结论:确定了母胎结合受损的模式。我们不应该认为他们是精神疾病的病理类别,而应该认识到,这样的父母是专业评估和支持(治疗)干预的目标。了解怀孕的意义和母亲角色实现过程中的困难是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信